A Recent Conversation Between Two MSA Board Members

Person A: For Friday prayers, the idea of women praying behind men is offensive. It’s a grave injustice that needs to be rectified.

Person B: So what do you propose?

A: The men’s area side by side with the women’s area.

B: But then, we know that the right (al-yamin) is favored. So that means whichever gender is on the right side has the advantage. That’s not fair either.

A: So then maybe we should do boy-girl order or create a free for all where people can pray wherever they want regardless of gender. Wouldn’t that be the most egalitarian?

B: Well, no, because the imam is still a man.

A: So we’ll be sure to have female imams.

B: But then what about the transgendered or even the non-gendered? Where is their representation?

A: Well, we can have a rotating schedule of imams across all genders.

B: Sounds good. But we are still facing Mecca. Doesn’t that privilege Saudi Arabia over all other countries and races?

A: Good point. We should rotate the qibla every week.

B. Also the prayer itself is in Arabic. Won’t that trigger or otherwise traumatize non-Arabs?

A: Right again. We need to make sure the imam recites in a variety of languages.

B. And sign language.

A: Of course.

B: All this sounds great, but at the end of the day, the Friday prayer is a Muslim practice and we are praying to Allah. Doesn’t that exclude people of other faiths?

A: Wow, you are so right! We should make sure to incorporate the gods and rituals of other faiths in the prayer, just to make sure all feel equally welcome.

B: Awesome! Now we can have a fully egalitarian service! I can’t wait.

 

A Recent Conversation Between Two MSA Board MembersPerson A: For Friday prayers, the idea of women praying behind men…

Posted by Daniel Haqiqatjou on Wednesday, April 27, 2016

Daniel Haqiqatjou

View all posts

Add comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *