Do Science and the Quran Ever Conflict? Yes.

Misconception 1: “Science and the Quran never conflict.”

Some Muslims claim that the Quran is 100% “scientifically accurate.” Again, it is easy to understand why Muslims would say this. Science is seen as a perfect representation of reality and the Quran is the speech of the One who created that reality. Therefore, logically, there should be perfect accord between the two.

The problem with this, however, is that science is not a perfect representation of reality. You do not have to be a Kuhnian postmodernist to accept this. Even the scientific community acknowledges that much of science is provisional in nature, meaning that science is always updating and evolving as new facts are discovered.

For example, the most scientifically robust theory we have today is Quantum Field Theory (QFT). Yet, physicists believe that QFT is either completely false or, at best, an imperfect approximation of a more complete, more accurate theory (one that can take into account the force of gravity).

Few, if any, scientists today would claim that they know the absolute truth in their field of research. (Scientists with a Popperian bent might even say science can never know the truth 100% but only disconfirm competing hypotheses.) In short, science is incomplete, and often it is wrong. What scientists hold as fact one day is often overturned the next.

As a concrete example, physicists in the early twentieth century believed that the universe was in a steady state of infinite size and age. Only in the 1930s did scientists begin to seriously consider a Big Bang theory of the development of the cosmos. Of course, the idea of an eternal universe contradicts the Quran, which describes a finite point of Creation. Had Muslims in the early 1900s, for example, decided to reinterpret the relevant verses of the Quran in order to accommodate the eternal steady-state model of the universe that was in vogue at the time, they would have had to backtrack three or four decades later when the Big Bang theory was popularized. In the same light, how can we be sure that the contemporary science used by some to reinterpret Quran and Islamic theology today will not similarly be overturned in three or four decades’ time? Given the tumultuous history of science, this is much more likely than not.

In the end, contrary to what some may mistakenly believe, science is not a perfect representation of reality, at least not today and perhaps never. Given the perfection of Allah’s speech, it would be inappropriate to make broad pronouncements on the Quran’s compatibility with something man-made, like science, which is inherently imperfect, tenuous, and constantly in flux.

Does this mean that we should not reflect on the Quran and ponder verses in light of different ideas found in science? Of course we can. Some Muslims certainly experience a boost in their iman by doing this and that should not be undermined. But, ultimately, the concern is when that personal reflection turns into a tafsir that one shares with others or, worse, becomes a broader philosophy about “the Quran and science.” This is problematic because, like any reflection on the Quran, publicly interpreting the Quran ought to follow the well-established norms of exegesis, i.e., tafsir, and adab with the Divine Address. We should heed the profound words of Allah’s Messenger (s):

“Whoever speaks of the Book of Allah from his own opinion is in error, even if correct.” [Abu Dawud, Tirmidhi]

[From my essay: 3 Common Misconceptions About Scientific Miracles in the Quran]

Misconception 1: “Science and the Quran never conflict.”Some Muslims claim that the Quran is 100% “scientifically…

Posted by Daniel Haqiqatjou on Friday, April 15, 2016

MuslimSkeptic Needs Your Support!
Notify of

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

This is so true. I have seen Muslims trying to interpret verses of the Quran in unsatisfactory ways only to ‘prove’ that the Quran is scientifically accurate. We should think the other way round, i.e science could be wrong if there is a contradiction between it and the Quran, not the Quran. The Quran is from the Creator, Who knows more than scientists (creation).

ed meds online

A lot of thanks for all your valuable hard work on this web page. Ellie enjoys doing internet research and it’s easy to see why. All of us hear all concerning the compelling means you deliver good information by means of the blog and as well cause contribution from other people about this concept plus my daughter is actually being taught a lot. Enjoy the remaining portion of the new year. You’re the one carrying out a glorious job.

I intended to compose you a bit of note in order to give many thanks again about the amazing advice you’ve contributed above. It’s generous of people like you giving easily all a few individuals could have advertised as an e-book in making some bucks for their own end, and in particular considering that you could have done it if you considered necessary. The advice additionally acted as a easy way to be aware that many people have a similar desire just as mine to figure out a good deal more around this condition. Certainly there are a lot more enjoyable instances ahead for folks who browse through your blog.

My husband and i ended up being cheerful Albert could carry out his analysis because of the ideas he acquired from your blog. It’s not at all simplistic just to always be freely giving concepts a number of people could have been making money from. And now we acknowledge we’ve got the blog owner to appreciate because of that. All of the explanations you’ve made, the easy blog menu, the friendships you aid to create – it’s all amazing, and it’s aiding our son and our family believe that that article is amusing, and that’s especially essential. Many thanks for all!