Contradictions: Outlawing Child Circumcision

Several European countries have banned the circumcision of infant boys. Also activists around the world oppose Female Genital Mutilation. Of course, FGM should be distinguished from female circumcision. They are not the same thing. FGM is something completely foreign to Islam. Yet you have people protesting FGM, female circumcision, and even male circumcision of children.

If the people who are protesting these practices were sincerely concerned with the sanctity of the human body, they would equally protest cosmetic surgery and tattooing, both of which can be considered types of mutilation of the human body.

People respond to this by making the distinction between infants, who cannot give meaningful consent, and adults who can elect for these procedures. But there are some inconsistencies here.

First of all, is a woman electing to go under the knife so that she can conform to a certain standard of beauty defined, not by her, but by others — is that really meaningful consent? Is she really acting according to her own will, or has she been influenced, perhaps even brainwashed, into thinking that this is what it means to be beautiful and that this is what she wants?

Secondly, let’s take a step back and marvel at a culture where a 3, 4, 5, or 6 month old fetus does not have a guaranteed right to life but in a short 3-6 months parents can’t get rid of some of his excess skin. In the few months between being a fetus and being born, something magical happens where parents go from having the right to terminate you in your entirety to not being allowed to have some of your foreskin snipped off since you can’t consent. What a world!

 

Outlawing Child CircumcisionSeveral European countries have banned the circumcision of infant boys. Also activists…

Posted by Daniel Haqiqatjou on Saturday, March 5, 2016

MuslimSkeptic Needs Your Support!
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

5 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mohammad A.

Male genital mutilation(circumcision) is not banned in any European country. There is a fundamental difference between adults modifying their own bodies(tattoos and piercings) and forcing an unnecessary amputation on a
nonconsenting child. It’s also interesting that you implied that foreskin is “excess skin”. To the contrary, there are many sexual and protective functions of the foreskin.

bob bob

male circumcision is sunnah akhi

John John

What are you talking about? What sexual/protective functions are there of foreskin? I think you’re getting it mixed up! It’s circumcision that has many sexual/ protective functions.

As the CDC says:
“Three randomized clinical trials showed that adult male circumcision significantly reduced the risk for HIV acquisition among heterosexual males by 51%–60% (95% confidence interval 16%–76%) over time. These trials also found that medically performed adult circumcision significantly reduced the risk of men acquiring two common sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including genital ulcer disease (GUD) prevalence by 47% and incidence by 48% and high-risk (i.e. oncogenic) types of human papilloma virus (HR-HPV) prevalence by 23%–47%”
https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/58456

Mohammad A.

I forgot to mention that female circumcision is outlawed in several European countries. Does that bother you at all?

order pamelor

I am commenting to let you know of the fantastic encounter my cousin’s daughter experienced reading your site. She even learned many issues, not to mention what it’s like to have a wonderful giving mindset to have many people just grasp chosen grueling subject areas. You really exceeded our expectations. Many thanks for distributing the informative, healthy, educational and as well as easy thoughts on the topic to Jane.