Starve A Child to Death, Get Only 6 Years (If You’re a Woman)

We all know how evil and oppressive the patriarchy is. Feminists and white knights can’t go two seconds without shouting about it.

If only we could just get rid of male authority and create a system where women were in charge of everything. Then the world’s problems would go away and we would all be able to enjoy a utopia beyond our wildest dreams.


Lauren Wade [age 2] was emaciated, dirty and riddled with head lice when she died in March 2015.

Margaret Wade, 38, and Marie Sweeney, 37, had admitted the willful ill-treatment and neglect of Lauren between June 2014 and March 2015.

They also pled guilty last month to a similar charge in connection with two older children between 2007 and 2015.

The lesbian couple was abusing children for years.

The chairman of Glasgow’s Child Protection Committee, Colin Anderson, called the case “an appalling tragedy.”

He said the cruelty and deceit of the women had helped them avoid what they perceived as interference from outside agencies.

The High Court in Glasgow had heard that the couple, of Townhead, Glasgow, did not keep the children clean, provide proper food, clothes or medical care.

Lauren was described as “skinny, dirty and unkempt” at the time. She also had a sodden nappy, bald patches and “thousands” of head lice.

Wade and Sweeney – a couple for 15 years – both regarded themselves as parents to Lauren.

They moved to a flat in the city’s Fountainwell Drive in 2011. A detective later branded the home “one of the most disgusting” he had seen in his career.

When it comes to child abuse, women are far more likely to be abusers than men. According to the US Department of Health and Human Services, approximately 40% of child victims of abuse were maltreated by their mothers acting alone, while only 18% of them were maltreated by fathers acting alone.

Lauren Wade, ya Rabbi

Women have a child abuse problem.

Do feminists spend much time on this fact? Of course not. Because it completely undermines their sexist claim that men are uniquely unjust and power-hungry and seek to violate the rights of others for their own selfish interests, while women are just helpless, innocent victims at their mercy.

But what could be more evil and cruel than maltreating an innocent child? What could be more gut-wrenchingly despicable than violating a child who is utterly dependent on you, who has nothing but love for you? It takes a special kind of malice to be able to abuse a child and women are more predisposed to have such malice, as all the official statistics show.

Wade’s [lawyer] Brian McConnachie said her mental health issues were “partially responsible” for the crimes.

Lady Stacey [the judge] went on to point out that advice in helping care for the children had been offered in 2007 then again in 2014, but was not taken.

Of course! The go-to defense of these monsters. It was psychological problems that caused these degenerate lesbians to starve an innocent two-year old and let her die in filth. I’m surprised the lawyer didn’t claim that the lesbians committed such heinous acts because they were abused by their fathers in the past. That’s a defense that appeals to the feminist mind. Anything bad a woman does it must be because of a man’s misdeeds somewhere, somehow. It was also reported:

Wade, who was Lauren’s biological mother, told police she had ‘no guilt’ over her daughter’s death.

Margaret Wade and Marie Sweeney showed no emotion as they were sentenced for neglecting the two-year-old.

Why would she feel guilty? If she didn’t care about her two-year old daughter literally starving and crying out of hunger, why would she suddenly feel remorse when she died?

So what is the jail sentence for these unrepentant child killers?

Just 6 years. All they were charged with was “child neglect” rather than the more serious charge of murder. That’s the way the “justice” system works in the Superior West®. Female perpetrators consistently get lighter sentences than men for the same exact crimes. A 2015 study from the University of Michigan Law School found that sentences for men are on average 63 percent longer than sentences for women.

Yet another gender disparity you won’t find feminists making a fuss about.

And let’s not forget…

Study after study has shown that gay and lesbian couples are more likely to abuse and molest children in their care. But this is not something the LGBT lobby wants the general public to be aware of. We all need to just shut up and pretend like there is nothing wrong with entrusting innocent children to people who are statistically far more likely to harm them. Who is the next Lauren?

“And (mention) Lot, when he said to his people, “Do you commit iniquity (fahisha) with eyes wide open? Do you indeed come with desire unto men instead of women? Nay, but you are a people behaving foolishly.” The reply of his people was but to say, “Turn Lot’s family out from your town! Truly they are people who keep themselves pure.” So We delivered him and his family, save his wife; We decreed that she would be from those who stay behind. And We brought down upon them a rain (of stones); Evil was the rain of those who had been warned!” [Quran 27:54-58]

MuslimSkeptic Needs Your Support!
Notify of

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Noorie Ner

Yup that makes total sense. Give all the “rights” to Individuals old enough to use their mind to reason and make independent decision to either
1. Kill their own children because it’s an inconvenient consequences of an activity they engaged in knowing full well this was a possibility.
2. Sell who knows how many children for a small amount of money in exchange for never ever having to ever take the responsibility of being a parent.
3. Deprive a child of having a mother / father and force the child to love them and their gay partner like they would love their mum and dad because they’re so equally deserving of a love from a child as a pair of biological parents would be. Because the two adults insisted on the arrangement because they are absolutely helpless over the situation and cannot fathom ever not being with a gay partner and they’d die without it.
Not because the guy is infertile or unable to have kids with a woman or anything like that…
4. Deprive a child of ever knowing who their biological parents were. And force them to spend the rest of their life thinking they shouldn’t have to seek out how many half siblings or cousins or aunts they may have out there because they’ve already got a “loving” family.

Who cares about the rights of those “leeches” that are not even human beings. Who cares about their rights. They can’t even think for themselves or even protect themselves physically and verbally.
Therefore you should only care for the “rights” of those people that are capable of making decisions for themselves and are able to physically and verbally try to defend themselves and their stupid arguments. Because they simply can’t have it any other way and they absolutely have no control over their minds and their little brains that does most of the thinking for them and they have very little use in their big brains.
Yeah okay sure. Fight for the rights of only those who can shout it the loudest and ignore anyone, sorry anyTHING that’s not even capable of doing so because they aren’t even deserving of any rights if they can’t even think for themselves.


Huh, homosexual parenting is dysfunctional. Who’d have thought?


The American Psychological Association (APA), 2004:
“There is no scientific evidence that parenting effectiveness is related to parental sexual orientation: lesbian and gay parents are as likely as heterosexual parents to provide supportive and healthy environments for their children”.

The American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP), 2006:
“The AAFP establishes policy and supports legislation that promotes a safe and nurturing environment, including psychological and legal security, for all children, including those of adoptive parents, regardless of the parents’ sexual orientation”.

The Psychological Society of South Africa (PsySSA), 2009:
“South African-based as well as other international research has found that there is no difference between children who are raised by homosexual versus heterosexual parents regarding matters such as sexual orientation, gender identity, sex-role behaviour, likelihood of being sexually abused, self-concept, intelligence, personality characteristics, behaviour problems, peer relations, parental separation and divorce, general adjustment and accomplishment of developmental tasks.”

The American Psychiatric Association (APA), 2005:
“The American Psychiatric Association supports initiatives which allow same-sex couples to adopt and coparent children and supports all the associated legal rights, benefits, and responsibilities which arise from such initiatives”.

The American Psychoanalytic Association (APsaA), 2012:
“Accumulated evidence suggests the family factors that are important for children’s outcomes and well-being are family processes and the quality of interactions and relationships. Evaluation of an individual or family for these parental qualities should be determined without prejudice regarding actual or perceived sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression. There is no credible evidence that shows that a parent’s sexual orientation or gender identity will adversely affect the development of the child”.

The American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (AACAP), 2009:
“There is no evidence to suggest or support that parents who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender are per se superior or inferior from or deficient in parenting skills, child-centered concerns, and parent-child attachments when compared with heterosexual parents”.

The Child Welfare League of America (CWLA), 2005:
“The Child Welfare League of America (CWLA) affirms that lesbian, gay, and bisexual parents are as well suited to raise children as their heterosexual counterparts”.

The National Association of Social Workers, (NASW), 2005:
“LGB people must be granted all rights, privileges and responsibilities that are granted to heterosexual people, including but not limited to inheritance rights, insurance, marriage, child custody, employment, credit, and immigration”.

The American Medical Association (AMA), 2004:
“(The) AMA will support legislative and other efforts to allow the adoption of a child by the same-sex partner, or opposite sex non-married partner, who functions as a second parent or co-parent to that child”.

The Australian Psychological Society (APS), 2007:
“It is family processes (such as the quality of parenting and relationships within the family) that contribute to determining children’s wellbeing and ‘outcomes’, rather than family structures, per se, such as the number, gender, sexuality and co-habitation status of parents. The research indicates that parenting practices and children’s outcomes in families parented by lesbian and gay parents are likely to be at least as favourable as those in families of heterosexual parents, despite the reality that considerable legal discrimination and inequity remain significant challenges for these families”.

The Royal College of Psychiatrists (RCPsych), 2007:
“The Royal College of Psychiatrists holds the view that LGB people should be regarded as valued members of society who have exactly similar rights and responsibilities as all other citizens. This includes equal access to… the rights and responsibilities involved in procreating and bringing up children”.

The American Bar Association (ABA), 1999:
“Supports the enactment of legislation and the implementation of public policy providing that adoption shall not be denied on the basis of sexual orientation”.

Barnardo’s, UK Children’s Charity, 31/01/2011:
“Children in the care system are continuing to lose out on potential parents. Society’s attitude plays a pivotal role in discouraging people from considering adoption. The idea that gay parents are second best must be challenged. To suggest that a same sex couple is not as able to raise a child as a heterosexual couple is at once absurd and unsubstantiated. To continue to discourage potential adopters simply because of their sexual orientation is severely diminishing the chances of securing loving, stable homes for the children who are waiting”.

The Canadian Psychological Association (CPA), 2006:
“A review of the psychological research into the well-being of children raised by same-sex and opposite-sex parents continues to indicate that there are no reliable differences in their mental health or social adjustment and that lesbian mothers and gay fathers are not less fit as parents than are their heterosexual counterparts”.

The entire scientific establishment seems to disagree with your assessment, Sadaad.