Is Crown Prince MBS Planning Muslim Concentration Camps for Saudi?

The thing about Western-backed Arab tyrants is they’re always looking for good ways to crack down on their Muslim populations. Most of the time, they’re too stupid to think of original ways to do this. They need to look for inspiration from other countries. Case in point:

Middle East Eye:

Saudi Arabia’s powerful Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman appeared to defend China’s use of internment camps to restrict members of the country’s Muslim minority, ignoring earlier calls for him to speak out on the plight of the Uighurs.

Without identifying the Uighurs specifically, the Saudi leader told Chinese President Xi Jinping on Friday that China “has the right to take anti-terrorism and de-extremisation measures to safeguard national security,” the country’s state-run CCTV said, as reported by AFP.

“Saudi Arabia respects and supports it and is willing to strengthen cooperation with China,” said bin Salman, also known as MBS.

This is all for financial gain, of course:

MBS’s comments came at the end of a two-day trip to Beijing that concluded with Saudi Arabia signing a $10bn deal for a refining and petrochemical complex in the country.

Here is the real kicker:

Meeting the crown prince earlier on Friday, Chinese Vice Premier Han Zheng also said the two countries should enhance exchanges on their experiences in de-radicalisation, China’s official Xinhua news agency said in a separate report.

The Gulf kingdom also pledged to cooperate with China on matters of counter-terrorism, while signing 35 economic cooperation agreements with China worth a total of $28bn, the Saudi Press Agency reported.

China has faced widespread international criticism for its human rights record, and in particular, for its abuses of members of the Uighur Muslim minority.

Numbering about 10 million in the country’s northwestern Xinjiang province, a million Uighurs are believed to be held in internment camps, dubbed “re-education camps” by Beijing.

Literally admits they are exchanging notes on how to repress Muslims. Such repression is always justified as “anti-terrorism” and “de-radicalization.” This is not new. Since the beginning of colonialism in the Muslim world, any Muslim resistance to the colonial mission was branded “terrorism” and “extremism,” which justified the most brutal crackdowns. And any Muslims from the outside who speak out against such repression are deemed “terrorist sympathizers” who are “providing material support to terrorists.” This is how many innocent Muslim brothers in the US were locked up on trumped up charges because they dared to say that Muslims shouldn’t be bombed to oblivion in places like Palestine, Afghanistan, and Iraq.

Because China is a geopolitical rival to the US, the US media machine is quick to point out the plight of our Muslim Uighur brothers. But they won’t show, much less denounce, the same Muslim oppression from US agents and allies. In fact, they try their best to cover it up or justify it.

Still, despite widespread concern from human rights groups about the plight of the Uighurs, very few Muslim-majority countries have spoken out about what’s going on in China, apparently out of fear that upsetting Beijing could spoil fruitful economic relations with the Chinese government.

Earlier this month, Turkey ended that silence, condemning China’s treatment of the Uighurs as “a great embarrassment for humanity”.

Props to Turkey for standing up to China. Where are Turkey’s regional allies in this, particularly Iran? Iran wants to pretend like they stand strong against oppression when it comes to Palestine. But that’s convenient when their oppressor is your worst enemy. Of course, the US is quick to criticize Iran for being silent on Chinese repression, too.

Innocent Muslims around the world are just pawns being used by these world powers for their own geopolitical maneuvering.

We need to rededicate ourselves to dua and praying sincerely to Allah to save us from the tyrants and help ease the suffering of our brothers. The dua of the oppressed is always answered, as our beloved Messenger, peace be upon him, tells us.

Beware of the supplication of the oppressed, for there is no barrier between it and Allah. [Bukhari and Muslim]

The supplications of three are never turned away: a fasting person until he breaks his fast, a just ruler, and the supplication of the oppressed which is raised by Allah above the clouds, the gates of heaven are opened for it, and the Lord says: By my might, I will help you in due time. [Tirmidhi]

MuslimSkeptic Needs Your Support!
Notify of

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Verily, rulers will come after me and whoever enters their abode, affirms their lies, and supports their oppression, they are not part of me and I am not part of them; they will have no presence at the Fountain. Whoever does not enter their abode, does not support their oppression, and does not affirms their lies, he is part of me and I am part of him; he will be present at the Fountain.”

Source: Sunan al-Tirmidhī 2190

Ahmad Khan

Abu Umamah reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, was asked, “Which jihad is most beloved to Allah?” The Prophet said, “A word of truth in front of a tyrannical leader.”

Source: Sunan al-Kubrā 18583

Hamid Pasha

IN FRONT of the ruler = not same as = On online forums (backbiting MUSLIM rulers).

Shaikh Muhammad al-Anjaree حفظه الله answered:

No doubt that the Prophet (ﷺ) said:

The best of the mujahideen is the individual who stands in front of an unjust ruler and orders him or forbids him, and then he [the ruler] kills him. This is the best of the mujahideen, as the Prophet said.

However, he said ‘Inda, which in Arabic means darful makkan – a particular place. Meaning in front of the unjust ruler, not that he’ll be all the way in Birmingham [England], talking about the hukaam (Rulers).



this is not backbiting you idiot. reporting the news to the unaware public is not backbiting you low iq inbred’d moron.


Madkhali lickspittle.

Hamid Pasha

Ad hominem shows you got no real argument to begin with.
“O you who believe! If a Faasiq (liar — evil person) comes to you with any news, verify it, lest you should harm people in ignorance, and afterwards you become regretful for what you have done”

[al-Hujuraat 49:6]

It was narrated that Hafs ibn ‘Aasim said: The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “It is enough lying for a man to speak of everything that he hears.” Narrated by Muslim in al-Muqaddimah, 6; Saheeh al-Jaami, 4482.

No, MBS did not defend Chinese Genocide of Uighurs

Spreading sensational false rumors proves you are part of the problem wreaking havoc in the Ummah.


May Allah swallow them and all Tyrants into the Earth like he did Firaun and Nimrrod

Hamid Pasha

Khawarij DO exist. Suicide attacks DO happen in Muslim lands more than non muslim ones.

Khurooj (rebellion/revolt) by weapons/suicide is PRECEDED by khurooj with the tongue (speech).

Ibn Hajar (d. 852 AH) (Rahimahullah) said:
“The Khawarij of al-Qadiyyah did not hold the view of waging war. Rather,they opposed the rulers in accordance to their strength, they called to their opinion and along with that they beautified revolt and held it to be good.” (at-Tadheed 8/114)

He also said: “The Qa’diyyah: Those who beautify revolt against the rulers yet do not actually do it themselves.”
(Hadyu’s-Saree, 459)

If those who incite revolts/revolutions/khurooj are NOT to be deemed as khawarij, then khawarij do not Exist?
Are Muslim RULERS to be blamed for the actions of these radical extremist deviants who bomb mecca and madina in month of ramadan? who blow up muslim children inside schools e.g. Peshawar army public school ?

Living in denial won’t help this matter.

Understand the 3 steps to khurooj:
-Tanfeer : Calling to hatred/animosity for muslim rulers and governments
-Takfeer : Excommunicating/making takfir on Muslim rulers and scholars
-Tafjeer : Actual physical revolt/khurooj/suicide missions

Prophetic guidance is clear on how to deal with rulers whose actions we do NOT agree with.
If THAT is not for you, then ask yourself: What will suffice instead?
The Jew Abdullaah ibn Saba used to say:
‘Begin by criticizing and attacking your leaders. And appear to enjoin the good and forbid evil so the people incline towards you.’
[Tareekh At-Tabari’ (4/341)]

Shaikh Muhammad ibn Saalih al-‘Uthaimeen (rahimahullah) said:
So when speaking about the king by backbiting, giving him advice in the open and publicizing (his faults), when that is (but) humiliation of him, that humiliation for which Allaah has threatened the one who does it with humiliation and debasement, then there is no doubt that it is obligatory to carefully observe what we have mentioned – that he should desire to give advice in secret and other such things. This being for the ones who are capable of advising them, from among the scholars, those who visit them and mix with them, and by whose advise they find benefit, as opposed to those besides the (scholars)….
(Maqaasidul-Islaam, p. 393)