The Agents Within

It is highly likely that protesters in the US are being infiltrated by undercover police or even intelligence operatives in order to discredit the cause. This is a very common tactic used globally to discredit any popular protest movement or political opposition.

Historical records show that secular regimes in the Muslim world via their intelligence agencies would plant operatives to discredit Islamic parties. These operatives would embed themselves in the groups and invariably push for acts of terrorism and other heinous crimes to turn Muslim populations against the Islamic cause. If the Islamic leadership refused, the agents would splinter off, thus crippling the entire movement.

Now, in 2020, some black leaders have recognized what is happening and their reaction has been to call a spade a spade, calling out the looters and violent rioters. How? By clearly saying: These are agents! These are provocateurs! It’s a hoax!

That’s their story and they’re sticking to it. No matter what, the answer is: They’re agents!

This is a smart strategy. Compare: What do many Muslim leaders do in response to terrorism?

They hold a press conference, denounce terrorism, apologize, repeat cliches about “Islam means peace,” talk about how the community needs to do some soul searching, grovel at the feet of other groups, invite government agencies to come to the masajid to hold trainings on how we can better police ourselves and root out the “extremists.” Some of our “leaders” actually go work with the agencies as counter extremist experts, etc., etc.

Furthermore, the important Islamic causes and values, such as Khilafa, Sharia, Jihad, al-Wala wal-Bara, etc., are quickly abandoned, no longer taught from the minbar, and anyone who does is denounced and/or reported to the thought police.

And then, those Muslims who see what is going on and call foul and say, “It’s a hoax! It’s a trick! Don’t believe it!” are shouted down as unserious “conspiracy theorists” who are “immature” and “don’t get it.”

Brothers and sisters, this dunya is a hoax.

MuslimSkeptic Needs Your Support!
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bin Uthman

Very Important message, the entire narrative that has catapulted the fear surrounding Islam and justified an entire war was built on a hoax. It should be no surprise to anyone that these agents, along with the selective and deliberate story telling of the news, and the psychological programming of Hollywood all play a role in creating the negative prejudices in the mind of the ignorant towards what will liberate it (Islam). A Muslim’s vision and scope should be clearer when it comes to the plotting of shaytan.

I believe the agents in this situation far extend discrediting political groups by infiltrating political groups by violent acts but also infiltrated the black narrative entirely in the entertainment industry. Black leaders should call out the agents who infiltrated their community and galvanized their children towards gangs, violence, drug dealing, womanizing, and crime. The agents in this matter are minor compared to these celebrity agents in the black community. At the end of the day, rats spelled backwards is star.

I studied marketing in university, and I know how deliberate and meticulous marketing can be. Very little is unmeasured or coincidental. They use people’s voids against them or create a void through psychological manipulation. Voids can include, purpose, Identity, recognition, “fitting in”, credibility/importance. It is through these voids, false promises and proposals to fill these voids are made. Depending on the extent someone has a void determines the extent they will adopt a solution. The proposer of these solutions may be in your interest but, for the most part, in the west they are interested in their own benefit. The agents in the entertainment industry play on the voids of many young members of society who struggle with identity, recognition, and purpose and propose that a life of crime would solve these problems and that they themselves’s are testimony to that. They used to drug deal, they used to do crime, and now they are celebrated and out of the ‘“hood.” I believe these agents that promote this lifestyle contributed the most detrimental harm on the vulnerability of the young minds of men from these communities so they can profit. Contrast that with Malcolm X who helped people fill their voids with true advice without seeking any profit. The sad reality is most of these entertainers do not even own the record labels they represent. They are rich men who have nothing to do with the “hood.”

My sincere question to the the west, why does your government turn a blind eye to the direct negative influences of the African American community that inspires some of them to do things that you will put them away for 30-40 years. Why do you not see correlations and continue to ask silly questions like, why are these young people committing so much crime? How can your detectives and specialists not draw the obvious and apparent influence of all the young men they arrest. How can you not distinguish between entertainment and negative propaganda? You seem to do it so well when it comes to “negative” influences against your liberal agenda and your adamant censorship of anything that goes against it for the “well being of kids.” Yet you cannot find the decency in you to censure the open glorification of killing, robbing, stealing, and drug dealing?

Leaders of the black community should call out all of their agents. I would love to see an article discussing this Daniel. I grew up with these influences and I am so shocked how under the radar these “entertainer” are when it comes to all the problems we see play out in our society. They are so quick to “represent” their community without ever acknowledging how detrimental they are. They dress up like you, talk like you, and sympathies with you just like these agents are doing now, just to falsely represent you on the world platform creating so much of the apprehension and prejudices people feel towards people from these communities.

Oolon Colluphid

No doubt there are undercover police and intelligence operatives among the protesters and in the organisations opposing police brutality. Their job is to provide information to the security forces about them and their memners. They very carefully don’t stand out and get noticed, but remain in the background observing and learning.
Their job isn’t rioting or looting to discredit protesters. There are plenty of other people doing that without needing to be paid for it..


An agent provocateur (French for “inciting agent”) is a person who commits or who acts to entice another person to commit an illegal or rash act or falsely implicate them in partaking in an illegal act, so as to ruin the reputation or entice legal action against the target or a group they belong to. An agent provocateur may be a member of a law enforcement agency acting out of their own sense of duty or under orders, or other entity. They may target any group, such as a peaceful protest or demonstration, a union, a political party or a company.


The reason these kinds of blame-deflecting antics on behalf of Islamist parties and movements is considered a “conspiracy theory” is because it is.

Can you point to any actual evidence for these claims of widespread infiltration? Is that really easier to believe than the notion that extremist Muslims (that is to say, Islamists) are often capable of and inclined towards violence?

Ibn Uthman

Saying something is a conspiracy theory requires evidence as well. You cannot label something as something because that’s what you believe or heard. What if where you heard it from is unreliable or malicious?
If a country has a vested interest in something, for example a country and they want to justify invading it. I can simply create a false flag, to justify my actions through a false narrative. This isn’t a new thing with America. Look into it. There are many examples of this.
To create order out of chaos is a concept where you deliberately create chaos to justify the order you want to put in place. Whether it is new law, stricter penalties, invasions, etc

However, I understand you cannot label each and every incident as agents. But, it is upon you not to take everything at face value either men and look into the history of these practices. When you realize that this is something continuously happening by certain people, you should not be surprised if they are doing that and therefore take what they say with caution.

Ibn Uthman

Just to clarify, this is not a justification for extremist or people who support them. I don’t justify their beliefs let alone their actions. So us Muslims are free from them. I refer to the narrative that is imposed on all Muslims rather than strictly those politically motivated extremists and I refer to the lack of acknowledgement by government to recognize their deliberate support in creating these groups. Which they themselves admit. Islamically there is no justification for trangression and unjustified violence against people. The people who do are often politically motivated from seeing what is taking place in their own home countries and not by Islamic principles.


The Algerian civil war in the 90s where the military forces dressed and acted as the mujahideen prior to committing atrocities. Later on as time passed loyalties changed and the truth came out, very senior officers escaped out of the country and spilt the truth on the terrorism and atrocities and that it was the military mimicking the insurgents who have done it all while the media both local and foreign blame shifted on to the mujahideen. There are countless documentaries that have been made and confessions by ex military officers. The other issue is the deliberate destruction of historic Sunni heritage especially mosques through airstrikes and then blaming the Sunni party in the conflict and Muslims end up believing the culprits because of their sleek propaganda machine.

Abu Bakr

conspiracy theories surrounding the Mujahideen are retarded, could you Imagine if someone said the Muhajireen were Quraishi agents in Madinah, giving the Quraish an excuse to attack Madinah. I really hope this post is not intended for us to refer to the Mujahideen as agents as a “strategy”, SubhanAllah that is nothing more than slander and unjust takfir on our brothers who are fighting to establish Allah’s law. There is no doubt they have made mistakes, but even the Sahaba made mistakes, did Khalid bin alWalid, may Allah be pleased with him, The draw Sword of Allah, not unjustly kill people? Did the Prophet call him an agent? No, he made Baraa from his act, but didnt remove him from his post. Adding onto this, many of those who critique the actions of the Mujahideen have no business doing so, and it is evident they are ignorant in the fiqh of Jihad, or in the case of certain “scholars” lying about and hiding these things. Brother Daniel, and those on the MuslimSkeptic team, just as you rightfully call out those who discuss Huddud in an inapporirate manner, I would advice you the same, fear Allah when speaking about the Mujahideen.
and Allah knows best


I think he is referring to what happened in Algeria in the 1990s with the GIA

Yusuf deen

Maa shaa Allah .. may Allah reward you akhi … we must remember that these mujahideen were never in the modernist paradigm .. alhamdulillah they have always been in the islamic paradigm unlike us and therefore when they progressed further than us ( in jihaad , establishing the sharia, calling towards tawheed and calling towards the rejecting of the taghut and its followers) we from the west who grew up with a corrupt understanding will always be quick to jump on them and attack them .. they have so much izzah and if we remove this veil and lens which we see them through ( of course inspired by the constant kuffaar news and liberal imaams who dont want to see the sharia being established) we will see them for what they are , those who are upon what the prophet salallahu alaihi wa sallam and the companions were upon …. the goal is to firslty establish leadership then call people towards it not the other way round .. this is not the manhaj of those guided people who came after the prophet …

As salamu alaykum,

I have questions for brother DH:

Do we support all POC, or just the Muslims?

Do we only report and call out atrocities committed by European descent people and ignore the KOC (kuffar of color)?

Do we care about Colin Powell, the Black American who lied between his teeth about Saddam WMDs?

Do we care about Condoleezza Rice, who supported every genocidal policy of the Bush regime against Muslims?

Do we support and care about the Black American president Obama, who continued much of the Bush policy in the ME, GitMo, and actually assassinated American Muslims without due process with their kids on foreign lands? Did Obama do justice to Nasser al-Awlaki and his family? Did their “AYYRAB” lives not matter?

How about Michelle Obama, the Black first lady of America, who is always up in George Bush bosom playfully as friend, or do we get made when a White lesbian Ellen DeGeneres does it? Does she not see his hands covered with the bloods of thousands of innocent from Iraq and Afghanistan and the subsequent conflicts?

How about the thousands of POC in the United States army who joined to kill Muslims, on Muslim lands, over false pretexts, to get green cards, loan forgiveness, tuition free education?

How about POC culture, that glorifies violence, gangster, pimp, stripper, and hoe culture? Much of it is now sipping into Muslim communities with the likes of French Montana and DJ Khalids shouting out “b#tchs” from the ME in their music videos? Do we ignore the culture, habits, of POC which puts them in direct conflict with police and authority? Should we be calling our women hoes and young females thots? Should we run credit cards in their a## cracks? Should we adopted injecting silicon into the back side? Should we accept as normal tattooing of the body and the face? The drinking of perp, lean, and popping pills and butt cheeks?

Can we even criticize any of this fahish/fitna without being called RACISTS?

If we criticize compassionate Muslims for allying themselves with LGBTQ, feminists, and liberal communities because they are deemed trojan horses, how about POC many of their habits, culture, passtime, entertainment, way of doing things that are littered with degeneracy and outright glorification of it?

Abu Abdullah

Shaykh of al-Azhar Ahmed at-Taib 10/10/2018 Sixth convention of leaders of world religions in Astana, Kazakitstan

“It pains me deeply to say that we almost believed this insidious lie.

The fact that we have wasted efforts and resources on what resembles a defense of Islâm and clearing it from the accusation of terror. Whereas the need is not so much in defending Islâm but equally exposing the evil intentions and the success of the systematic media campaign (against Islam).

Yes, successful. I say this with bitterness and sorrow.

Successful in the sense that they have linked Islâm with terrorism and Muslims with brutality and barbarianism in the minds of most of those from the West.

It has managed to terrify the world’s youth, children, women and men from this religion.

I believe that the technology, training and military capabilities of the Arab world cannot sufficiently explain the sudden appearance of this tremendous force (ISIS) which has the ability to freely move, roam, pass through borders and attack and retreat in total safety!

This causes us to seriously doubt that this terrorism which was born with teeth, fangs and claws is an exclusively Arabic and Islâmic creation.

We admit that the stage is definitely Islâmic and Arabic and that the players are definitely Arabs and Muslims but we doubt that its script and production are purely Arabic and Islâmic!”

Abu Abdullah

Chapter 5
False Flag Terrorism:
Israel’s History of Deception
We have seen that Israel and its neoconservative patrons in Washington orchestrated the wars in Iraq
and Afghanistan based upon false pretenses. Saddam’s alleged “weapons of mass destruction” were a
Straussian myth and Osama bin Laden’s purported involvement in 9/11 was predicated on flimsy
innuendo and has never been proven in any court of law.
The 9/11 attacks represented the “new Pearl Harbour” spoken of by the Likudnik neocons a full year
before that fateful September day. This truly “catalyzing event” was described as a “good thing for
Israel” and a “Hanukkah miracle” by Israel’s leaders.
Twenty-one years prior to 9/11, the founder of Israel’s intelligence services made an astonishing
prediction. Michael Evans, a pro-Zionist Evangelical Christian from the U.S., made a trip to Israel in
1979. On his trip he met with Isser Harel, the Israeli spy chief, at his home. Over dinner, Harel
imparted to Evans that “Islamic fundamentalists” would soon attack America and that they would
strike New York City’s “tallest building” because it represented a “phallic symbol.”[130] This
remarkable “prediction” can be interpreted as either evidence of foreknowledge or proof of planning.
As Israel’s chief spymaster from 1947 to 1963 and a member of the Zionist underground prior to
Israel’s formation, Harel and his fellow Zionists had been responsible for a multitude of “false flag”
terrorist tricks. The year 1946 witnessed a devastating Zionist bombing of the King David Hotel in
Jerusalem, which was housing the British Administrative Headquarters for Palestine at the time. The
Irgun, a Zionist terror group waging an insurgency against the native Arabs of Palestine as well as the
British colonial rulers of that land, planted and detonated bombs in the hotel’s basement, killing 91
people, including dozens of British personnel. In a 2002 BBC documentary called “Age of Terror,”
the Zionist bombers admitted to disguising themselves as Arabs as they carried out the attack.[131]
Irgun’s leader at the time of the bombing was none other than Menachem Begin, who later became the
prime minister of Israel in 1977.
Israel initiated another false flag deception in 1954, this time in Egypt. Egyptian Jews who had been
recruited by Israeli intelligence planted firebombs in British and American-owned cinemas and other
buildings in Cairo and Alexandria. The attacks were designed to frame Egyptian Muslims and thereby
poison relations between Egypt and the West. Codenamed “Operation Susannah,” the plot was foiled
after one of the Zionists’ explosives detonated prematurely in his pocket, leading to the capture and
confessions of all the Zionist conspirators. The incident was later dubbed the “Lavon Affair,” named
after Israel’s then-Defense Minister Pinhas Lavon who was forced to resign as a result of the debacle.
Instead of condemning this act of terrorism, Israeli President Moshe Katsav held a ceremony in 2005
honouring several of the surviving terrorists who took part in the operation with medals of
In 1967, Israel turned its aggression against America once again. During the Arab-Israeli Six Day
War, Israel attacked an American surveillance ship, the USS Liberty, in international waters. In a prolonged two-hour assault, the Israelis mercilessly attacked the American vessel with warplanes
and torpedo boats. Killing 34 and critically wounding 171 others, the Israelis intended to sink the
ship, killing all on board. The ship, however, did not sink, and Israel’s treachery was exposed.
Israel’s purpose for attacking this U.S. ship was quite simple: the Liberty was a sophisticated
surveillance vessel and had caught wind of war crimes the Israeli Army committed in the Sinai desert
as well as Israeli military plans to seize large chunks of land from the neighbouring Arab states of
Syria and Egypt. To prevent any information about their militarist plans from being relayed back to
Washington, who may well have intervened to stop them, the Israelis decided to bomb the ship and
perhaps have it blamed on the Arabs afterwards. The corrupt American government under Lyndon
Baines Johnson, an ardent Zionist, promptly ordered a cover up of the incident so as to not embarrass
The Six Day War itself was little more than a pre-meditated imperialist Israeli land-grab. Zionist
propaganda always presents Israel as the poor victim of “Arab aggression,” but reality is very much
the opposite. Israeli PM and Irgun terrorist Menachem Begin admitted Israel’s bellicose intent. Begin
addressed Israel’s National Defense College on August 8, 1982, wherein he attempted to justify his
invasion and occupation of Lebanon that same year. In reference to the Six Day War, he proudly
confessed: “The Egyptian Army concentrations in the Sinai approaches do not prove that Nasser was
really about to attack us. We must be honest with ourselves. We decided to attack him.”[134]
In 1983 during the Lebanese civil war, which was to a large extent fostered by Israel’s invasion of
that country a year earlier, American and French military units were dispatched into Lebanon as a
“peacekeeping” force. In October of that year two truck bombs are said to have exploded outside of
two separate marines barracks housing American and French troops in Beirut. The blasts killed 299
American and French military personnel and wounded hundreds more. Victor Ostrovsky, a former
Mossad officer, reported in his book By Way of Deception that Israeli intelligence had prior
knowledge of the attacks, but chose not to warn their American and French “allies” of the imminent
danger.[135] This tacit complicity in the killing of hundreds of Western troops unveiled Israel’s cold￾blooded exploitation of any possible schism between the Arab/Muslim world and the West. Some
commentators have inferred that Israel may have even had a direct hand in the Beirut bombings to
encourage America and France to get out of Israel’s way and let her deal with the Arabs as she
In 1986, a bombing took place in Germany at La Belle disco, a Berlin-based nightspot frequented by
U.S. military personnel stationed in the area. The explosion killed three people and wounded
hundreds of others. The incident was immediately blamed on Libya, and was used by U.S. President
Ronald Reagan as a pretext for a bombing campaign against the North African country. Reagan
launched air assaults on Libya 10 days after the incident in Germany. As a result, at least 60 Libyans
were killed, hundreds more were wounded and much infrastructure in the Libyan cities of Tripoli and
Benghazi was destroyed. Despite Reagan’s claims, there was no evidence of Libyan state
involvement in the nightclub bombing in Berlin, but there is strong evidence which suggests the attack
was the handiwork of American and Israeli intelligence.
A 1998 report published on the World Socialist Web Site headlined “German TV exposes CIA Mossad links to 1986 Berlin disco bombing” details the findings of a German documentary that
investigated the Berlin disco incident.[136] The investigation was conducted by Frontal magazine
and the video was produced and aired by Zweites Deutsches Fernsehen (ZDF television). The World
Socialist Web Site’s report explained that the German documentary “presents compelling evidence
that some of the main suspects in the 1986 Berlin disco bombing, the event that provided the pretext
for a US air assault on Libya, worked for American and Israeli intelligence.”
According to the German documentary’s investigation, the principal protagonists of the bombing,
Musbah Eter and Mohamed Amairi, worked for the CIA and Mossad respectively. A Libyan man
named Yasser Chraidi was made into a scapegoat by German intelligence, at the behest of the CIA
and Mossad. Mohamed Amairi’s Norwegian lawyer, Odd Drevland, confirmed that Amairi was “a
Mossad man.” The German documentary concluded: “One thing is certain, the American legend of
Libyan state terrorism can no longer be maintained.” The World Socialist Web Site’s report reiterated
that the German documentary investigation proved without a shadow of doubt that the Berlin disco
bombing was “a carefully prepared provocation” by the CIA and Mossad.
Victor Ostrovsky provided corroboration of this frame-up. In his book By Way of Deception,
Ostrovsky revealed that a short time before the Berlin disco bombing Mossad agents snuck into Libya
and planted a “Trojan” device in an apartment building in Tripoli.[137] “The device would act as a
relay station for misleading transmissions made by the disinformation unit in the Mossad, called LAP,
and intended to be received by American and British listening stations,” writes Ostrovsky. The
special device broadcast fabricated transmissions that made it appear as though the Libyan
government was dispatching terrorist directives to its embassies worldwide. These phony messages
were then picked up by American intelligence and used as evidence to blame Libya for the Berlin
attack. “The listeners would have no doubt they had intercepted a genuine communication, hence the
name Trojan, reminiscent of the mythical Trojan horse,” writes Ostrovsky. He continued:
Mossad was tied in to many of the European terrorist organizations, and it was convinced
that in the volatile atmosphere that had engulfed Europe, a bombing with an American victim
was just a matter of time. Heads of the Mossad were counting on the American promise to
retaliate with vengeance against any country that could be proven to support terrorism.
Ultimately, the Americans fell for the Mossad ploy head over heels dragging the British and
the Germans somewhat reluctantly in with them. Operation Trojan was one of the Mossad’s
greatest successes. It brought about the air strike on Libya that President Reagan had
The year 1993 saw a major terrorist attack on American soil. In February of that year a truck bomb
was detonated in the basement of the north tower of New York City’s World Trade Center, causing the
deaths of six people and wounding more than a thousand others. Likudnik neocons in the American
Enterprise Institute immediately tried to pin the bombing on Iraq, but few believed their flaccid
propaganda. Interestingly, Saddam Hussein had a theory of his own about the incident. In 2008 the
Pentagon released a study of 600,000 Iraqi government documents that had been seized in the 2003
invasion. Among the files was an audio recording of Hussein speculating that the 1993 WTC attack
may have been the handiwork of Israeli or American intelligence.[138]
Saddam’s suspicions were on track. Israeli and American intelligence had intimate foreknowledge of and direct involvement in the bombing. The FBI had a key mole inside the group of conspirators
alleged to have perpetrated the act. Emad Salem, a former Egyptian army officer, exposed his own
FBI handlers’ complicity in the WTC attack by secretly recording his conversations with Bureau
officials. The recordings undoubtedly indicate that the FBI was fully aware of the plot to bomb the
WTC and with Salem’s help were supposed to swap the real bombing materials with a harmless
powder, but that did not happen. Salem blamed the FBI for messing up what he thought would be a
sting operation. Ralph Blumenthal of the New York Times reported in the Oct. 28, 1993, edition of the
Law-enforcement officials were told that terrorists were building a bomb that was eventually
used to blow up the World Trade Center, and they planned to thwart the plotters by secretly
substituting harmless powder for the explosives, an informer said after the blast. The
informer was to have helped the plotters build the bomb and supply the fake powder, but the
plan was called off by an F.B.I. supervisor who had other ideas about how the informer,
Emad A. Salem, should be used, the informer said.[139]
The Times article, headlined “Tapes Depict Proposal to Thwart Bomb Used in Trade Center Blast,”
The account, which is given in the transcript of hundreds of hours of tape recordings that Mr.
Salem secretly made of his talks with law-enforcement agents, portrays the authorities as
being in a far better position than previously known to foil the February 26th bombing of
New York City’s tallest towers.[140]
Journalist and author Ralph Schoenman highlighted Israel’s hand in the operation in an investigative
report entitled “Who Bombed the U.S. World Trade Center? — 1993: Growing Evidence Points to
Role of FBI Operative.”[141] According to Schoenman’s research, Josie Hadas, a Mossad agent, had
infiltrated the “Islamist” group said to have been responsible for the bombing. Hadas was linked to
the Ryder rental truck used in the bombing. A Muslim man named Mohammad Salameh had rented the
truck presumably on her behalf because he wrote down her telephone number on the rental agreement.
Later, police traced the phone number to an apartment in Jersey City and found incriminating
materials used in bomb making as well as a note addressed to Salameh, but Hadas had vanished.
After the discovery, authorities quickly zeroed in on Salameh and attempted to build a case around
him, despite numerous indications that he was an innocent victim of a frame-up.
After the explosion at the WTC on Feb. 26, 1993, Salameh went back to the Ryder rental office in
Jersey City requesting a refund for the $400 deposit he made on the truck, claiming it had been stolen
the night before the blast. Would a sophisticated terrorist who had just committed a serious crime
deliberately draw attention to himself by doing this? Not likely. But a patsy who did not understand he
was being framed would. The New York Times inferred the same: “Such enigmas caused local
investigators to ‘dismiss Mr. Salameh as perhaps a patsy for others, someone who may have been
duped into carrying out the attack and taking the blame.’”[142]
In his report, Schoenman also detailed Israel’s advanced prior knowledge of the attack. On the day of
the bombing, Schoenman writes, “an Israeli intelligence group sent an urgent communiqué over a
telephone access computer network about the event.”[143] The communiqué was discovered
accidentally on an Israeli government information database pertaining to espionage and security matters called “Matara” and then leaked to the Israeli press. According to Schoenman’s sources the
communiqué “states that Israeli Intelligence had advance knowledge of the timing and target of the
World Trade Center bombing and that it would be attributed to ‘known activists from the Occupied
Territories (i.e., Palestinians).’”[144]
In addition to Hadas, another Mossad mole had penetrated the “Islamist” group in New York. A
Palestinian man named Ahmad Ajaj was indicted as one of the “masterminds” of the 1993 WTC
attack, but he was later exposed by investigative reporter Robert Friedman as a double agent who had
been recruited to work for Mossad while serving prison time in an Israeli jail.[145] Interestingly, the
aforementioned Israeli intelligence communiqué spoke of “known activists from the Occupied
Territories” who would be blamed for the WTC bombing. Ajaj, a Palestinian, was the perfect patsy.
A plausible scenario is that this Mossad asset Ajaj was being used as a dupe to take the fall for the
WTC bombing, thereby linking Palestinian resistance groups to an act of terrorism on American soil
— a standard Zionist technique to demonize those resisting Israeli occupation.
Unfortunately for those in Mossad seeking to double-cross Ajaj and thus turn public opinion against
Palestinian resistance groups as a whole, the facts don’t bear out that he was anything near an activist
for the Palestinian cause. American Free Press reported that “Kol Ha’ir, a respected Hebrew￾language weekly published in Jerusalem, said Ajaj was never involved in intifada activities or with
Hamas or even the Palestine Liberation Organization.”[146] Ajaj, writes American Free Press
reporter Michael Collins Piper, “was actually a petty crook arrested in 1988 for counterfeiting U.S.
dollars out of East Jerusalem. Ajaj was convicted of counterfeiting and then sentenced to two-and-a￾half years in prison.” It was during his stay in an Israeli jail when Mossad recruited him, according to
Piper’s source Robert Friedman. Piper continues:
Friedman reports that [upon his release from prison] Ajaj had suddenly become a devout
Muslim and an outspoken hard-line nationalist. Then, Ajaj was arrested for smuggling
weapons into the West Bank, supposedly for El Fatah, a subdivision of the PLO. But
Friedman’s sources in Israeli intelligence say that the arrest and Ajaj’s subsequent
deportation were “staged by Mossad to establish his credentials as an intifada activist.”
Mossad allegedly “tasked” Ajaj to infiltrate radical Palestinian groups operating outside
Israel and to report back to Tel Aviv. Israeli intelligence sources say that it is not unusual for
Mossad to recruit from the ranks of common criminals.[147]
Strangely, two years before the bombing Israeli security officials inspected the garage of the World
Trade Center for Zim American Israeli Shipping Co., which had offices in the towers. The Israelis
determined that the towers were indeed vulnerable to a truck bomb.[148] One is left to ponder
whether this Israeli “inspection” of the WTC’s garage was part of the preparation for the attack or
just some innocent coincidence. The former seems the more likely scenario, given Israel’s long
history of false-flag terrorism and the proven role of Mossad moles within the cell said to be
responsible for this lethal attack.
There are also strong indications that Israeli intelligence had detailed foreknowledge of the 1998 U.S.
embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania in which 212 people were killed and thousands more
wounded. A largely unknown clue as to Israel’s involvement in the bombings was written about on the World Socialist Web Site and in the Washington-based Spotlight newspaper.
The World Socialist Web Site ran a report by Martin McLaughlin titled “Questions mount in Kenya,
Tanzania bombings” with the sub-heading “US government, Israeli intelligence had advance
warning.”[149] McLaughlin cited ABC News and the Tel Aviv newspaper Haaretz who divulged that
a Kenyan informer warned the American government two weeks prior to the August 7, 1998,
bombings that the U.S. embassy in Nairobi was going to be targeted by terrorists. The informant was
one of Mossad’s contacts in the country. The Americans, observed McLaughlin, asked the Israelis
about the reliability of the source and they dismissed him as untrustworthy, telling the Americans to
ignore his warnings. As a result, no special security precautions were taken at the embassy to guard
against attacks.
The Spotlight carried a story headlined “Zionists Target Iran” reporting much the same thing. “The
Mossad, Israel’s secret service, literally set up the U.S. embassy in Nairobi, Kenya, for the August 7
truck bombing by persuading the CIA and the White House to disregard American intelligence
reports,” wrote Warren Hough, a reporter for The Spotlight.[150] Hough continued:
Those reports warned that a terrorist raid against this facility was imminent, it was learned
as this issue of The SPOTLIGHT went to press. Four months worth of tips and alert signals
that the Nairobi embassy was facing a potential disastrous explosives attack were sent to
Washington last month by the U.S. ambassador in Kenya, Florence Bushnell, and by
intelligence controllers of the U.S. Central Command. But nothing was done to protect this
poorly shielded facility because, on the standard operating procedure inaugurated in the
Reagan era, the FBI had to turn to the Israelis for a definite evaluation of these early
The Mossad urged the U.S. government to disregard the warnings. “Ignore them, it’s just another false
alarm,” Mossad purportedly told their counterparts in the CIA. Hough further discerned: “This
information, delivered to Washington just weeks before the monstrous explosion, was the key factor
in persuading the U.S. to let its guard down, resulting in the loss of life of at least 250 victims
including 11 Americans, angry Washington intelligence sources told The SPOTLIGHT.”[152]
The U.S. embassy building in Nairobi, Kenya, had once been Israel’s embassy. An August 10, 1998,
article in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel revealed that “The embassy was built 30 years ago by
Israel. … It housed the Israeli embassy briefly before Israel was forced to close it … after the 1973
Mideast war.”[153] Interestingly, Israeli military and intelligence officials were unusually quick to
arrive at the bombed-out sites as part of the “rescue crew.”[154] Journalist Ralph Schoenman
reported that “The first soldiers on the scene [in Kenya and Tanzania] were special units of the Israeli
armed forces and high level agents of the Mossad.”[155] Analyst George Pumphrey, in an article
entitled “US Embassy bombings in East Africa (1998),” alleged that “Neither the surveillance
cameras in Dar es Salaam nor in Nairobi were set to film.”[156] He noted that Osama bin Laden,
who was blamed for the attacks, could not have performed this feat.
Former Pakistani spy chief Hamid Gul posited a theory about the embassy attacks in an interview
with The Washington Times. When asked who he believed was responsible for the bombings, Gul replied; Mossad is strong in both countries. Remember the Israeli operation to free hostages in
Entebbe (Uganda)? Both Kenya and Tanzania were part of the logistical tail. A so-called
associate of Osama was framed at Karachi airport. The incidents took place on Aug. 8, 1999,
and on the 10th a short, clean-shaven man disembarks at Karachi airport and presents the
passport of a bearded man. Not your passport, he was told. He then tries to bribe the clerk
with 200 rupees. A ludicrously small sum given the circumstances. The clerk says no and
turns him in and he starts singing right away. Not plausible. Osama has sworn to me on the
Koran it was not him and he is truthful to a fault. Pious Muslims do not kill innocent civilians
who included many Muslim victims. The passport must have been switched while the man
was asleep on the plane in what has all the earmarks of a Mossad operation. For 10 years,
the Mujahideen fought the Soviets in Afghanistan and not a single Soviet embassy was
touched anywhere in the world. So this could not have been Osama’s followers.[157]
These historical examples illustrate in no uncertain terms that Israel has continuously used terrorism
and trickery as a method of coercion. Author and musician Gilad Atzmon, a former Israeli citizen who
now resides in Britain, said, “Israel has made false-flag terrorism into an art-form.” Journalist Greg
Felton commented that Israel’s effectiveness lies in its ruthlessness. “[Israel] commits murder,
blackmail, terrorism; it knows no limits to its arrogance. And countries who are afraid of being
targeted by Israel will naturally not want to upset it,” he said in an interview with American Free
Press. Felton opined that Israel “has no moral, political or historical legitimacy. It exists solely
because it terrorized the world into approving its existence.”[158]

Grand Deceptions:
Zionist Intrigue in the 20th and 21st Centuries

by Brandon Martinez