Note: The ban has only passed the French Senate and has yet to be passed fully into law.
On March 31, 2021, France furthered its mission to subjugate Muslims.
After banning the wearing of the hijab in public schools in 2004, the Senate has voted to ban the hijab for anyone under 18 years-old in public.
French senator, Christian Bilhac, said on the subject:
“To what extent can a secular republic tolerate that children display religious signs in full view of everyone? It is not up to parents to impose dogma on children. It is essential that there are protective spaces for them and a pathway to emancipation.”
This political decision is part of a strategy that consists of denying any rationality to Islam. The explicit basis for the ban is the following assertion: There is no rational purpose for the veil and Muslim women are forced to wear it against their best interests.
But this is simply incorrect. Hijab is supremely rational, and it is very much in the best interests of women, men, children, and all of society because, among many things, it reduces the kind of promiscuous sexual activity that creates broken marriages, children born out of wedlock, debauchery, lascivious immorality, and a whole host of other evils that have come to characterize French society and the Western world more generally.
The French Republic – which has established itself through propaganda, social engineering, and political coups – does not impose its secular will through reason and argumentation. Rather it uses force to monopolize the discourse and bars objections to its draconian policies. Such is the nature of secularism.
Bizarrely, the journalist Gérard Leclerc claimed on public television that the reason Islam requires hijab is because women’s hair is reminiscent of hair on the female private parts. This is the kind of “strawmanning” done to discredit Islamic practices.
We also heard that the hijab was a political banner of “Islamism” and that the hijab is a sign of endogamy, i.e., that Muslim women only marry Muslim men. This angers the French libertine, of course, who fantasizes about Muslim women, as evidenced by France’s long history of orientalist paintings and novels since the 18th century.
This new ban was justified by two points:
- Hijab signifies the inferiority of women to men
- Parents should not impose religious practice on their children.
Concerning the first point, this has no scriptural source in Islamic texts. And this is not proven by reason either. Why should being more covered signify inferiority? Why could it not signify superiority? Are the libertine French simply projecting their own twisted obsession with female nudity onto Islam?
Regarding the second point, this even more clearly shows French hypocrisy. Haven’t they imposed their own secular religion on millions of children in the past? It was the French Republicans themselves who spoke of their Republican religion when they had to propose an alternative to Christianity during their Reign of Terror in the aftermaths of the French Revolution.
The philosophers of the Enlightenment after the French Revolution saw the need to build a secular religion. This is exactly why the Republican School educational program was made compulsory for all children by Jules Ferry in order to impose republican values on the population of the time, which was Catholic.
This is found clearly mentioned:
“No, certainly, the State is not a doctor of mathematics, a doctor of letters nor of chemistry. […] If it is appropriate for it to pay teachers, it is not to create or spread scientific truths; it is not for that reason that it is involved in education: it is involved in it to maintain a certain state morality, a certain state doctrine, indispensable to its preservation.” [Jules Ferry to the House, June 26, 1879]
France is still advancing in its plan to eradicate Islam, and its program may soon serve as a guide for other Western countries to follow suit.
Boycott France, again and again.