The US political scene is in an uproar as the “unthinkable” is set to happen. Abortion could soon be legally BANNED:
A leaked initial draft majority opinion suggests the U.S. Supreme Court is poised to overturn the Roe v. Wade decision that legalized abortion nationwide, Politico reported on Monday.
The unprecedented leak stunned Washington. It holds the potential to reshape the political landscape ahead of U.S. midterm elections in November.
Contrary to what ignorant feminists claim, the original Roe v. Wade Supreme Court ruling did not give women the unqualified right to rip out babies from their womb whenever they wanted. Rather, the Court claimed that there has to be a balance between the rights and interests of the mother and the interests of society (notice how the rights of the father factor no where in any of this, yet another example of how the West has been a feminist dystopia for decades now).
Society obviously has an interest in birth. For example, if women stop having babies, society will go extinct.
The details of that balance between the mother’s interests and the interests of the state, i.e., society’s can be summarized like this:
In January 1973, the Supreme Court issued a 7–2 decision in McCorvey’s favor ruling that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides a “right to privacy” that protects a pregnant woman’s right to choose whether to have an abortion.
It also ruled that this right is not absolute and must be balanced against governments’ interests in protecting women’s health and prenatal life. The Court resolved this balancing test by tying state regulation of abortion to the three trimesters of pregnancy: during the first trimester, governments could not prohibit abortions at all; during the second trimester, governments could require reasonable health regulations; during the third trimester, abortions could be prohibited entirely so long as the laws contained exceptions for cases when they were necessary to save the life or health of the mother.
So, banning third semester abortion (except in life or death situation) is already consistent with Roe v. Wade. You might not have known that. The crazy thing is that feminist activists have wanted to go further. They have wanted the right to literally tear out their babies in the third trimester. Some have even advocated for “after-birth” abortions. Basically, if the mother doesn’t like her newborn child, she should have the unconditional right to kill it!
“Muslim” Activists Losing Their Minds
This was predictable.
We don’t want to set it back 50 years, Linda. We want to set it back 1400 years.
The liberal “Muslim” sheroes are having a MELT DOWN, of course. Do they meltdown for anything other than the interests of homosexuals, transgenders, and fornicaters?
These are the “leaders” we were told by Compassionate Imams to support for years.
Notice how Sarsour is suddenly so concerned about people being able to make their own health decisions. Where was all this moral outrage when they were pushing mandatory death vaxx on us and our children? I guess Sarsour only believes that we can make our own decisions when it comes to murdering babies, but not when Pfizer has new record-breaking profits to make.
Also, Ilhan and Sarsour keep talking about WOMEN’s health. That is EXTREMELY transphobic. They should say “birthing person.” This is not just about women’s health. Men and non binary entities can get abortions too.
If you have Twitter, make sure to reply to their tweets pointing out their hateful transphobia.
How Many Abortions Are for “Health” Reasons?
All this garbage about “women’s lives at risk” and “women’s health” is the most vile feminist lie. What percentage of abortions are due to health reasons where a woman’s physical health is in danger because of the pregnancy? Not even 1%. Most abortions are due to women who don’t want the responsibility of motherhood, mostly because they want to work and be able to fornicate with no consequence. Banning all non-life-threatening abortions would vastly reduce zina in society and increase motherhood, which would have countless benefits for society.
The trick that these feminists use, by the way, is saying that if a woman doesn’t want to have a baby, that negatively impacts her mental health. So, by this definition of “health” essentially ALL abortions are for “health reasons.” Imagine. If a woman doesn’t get to do everything she wants, including murder her unborn child, then that is considered psychologically traumatizing for her. Any time a woman has to face some sort of accountability or consequence for her decisions, her mental health is compromised. All of society has to bend over backwards to the point of tolerating baby murder just so that women don’t experience the slightest inconvenience. This is really the world that we live in now. This is what a society run by women is like.
Deviant “Muslim” Organizations Demand More Baby Killing
You might have missed this news from last year: A bunch of ineffectual “Muslim” orgs wrote an open letter calling all Muslims to oppose any abortion bans. They did this as response to the great news that the state of Texas had put strict limitations on abortion.
Here is the letter, published by the nearly-defunct MuslimGirl blog.
The organizations involved:
KARAMAH: Muslim Women Lawyers for Human Rights
American Muslim Bar Association
Muslim Wellness Foundation
American Muslim Health Professionals
Muslim Public Affairs Council
Veteran MuslimSkeptic readers will, of course, be familiar with the vile MuslimGirl as well as HEART Women and Girls. But all of these organizations are at the same level of deviation and moral depravity. Some of them, other than HEART, are quite vocal proponents of homosexuality, transgenderism, and gay “Muslims.”
You will note that their open letter appeals to the “diversity of fiqh” article written by Omar Suleiman and published by Yaqeen Institute. It’s no coincidence that the most deviant munafiqeen cite Yaqeen material. Normally, one would not blame an org for the kind of people who cite its work. But in this case, Yaqeen invited the approval of such fussaq and fahishah-promoters by including in its article a passionate defense of Planned Parenthood, i.e., the main institutional promoter of abortion (and LGBT and trans kids and…) in the US, founded by a white supremacist feminist, Margaret Sanger.
As for the contents of the letter and the “diversity of fiqh” argument, this deserves its own analysis. But suffice to say, it is complete rubbish. There is no diversity in the fiqh because no school of fiqh has ever said that a woman has the unconditional right to terminate her pregnancy whenever she wants. The most permissive minority positions in classical fiqh which allow termination up to 120 days after conception nonetheless require the consent of the husband. You will not find any “my body, my choice” affirming fiqh views in the entirety of the fiqh corpus, no matter what vague and fraudulent claims the Compassionate Imams and their orgs shilling for the Democratic party in the US might tell you.
And even if scholars of the past allowed women the unconditional right to abortion, they were speaking in a world where fornication was not rampant, where women weren’t abandoning marriage and motherhood to be corporate wage slaves, etc. In our world, where these diseases are not only rampant, but are in fact, tearing society to shreds right before our very eyes, the ulama of our tradition would have strongly denounced abortion and its vile promoters as tools of Iblis himself! As evidence for this, you will note that no legitimate scholarly authority has affirmed “my body, my choice” and the unconditional right for women to abort.
So, shut up with your “diversity of fiqh” nonsense.
(The larger claim in the open letter that Muslim states historically did not prefer one fiqh opinion and establish it into policy is laughably false. Even in the time of the Khulafa al-Rashidun, there were often multiple opinions that the Sahaba held, yet the khalifa — Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, and Ali — would invariably institute the position he understood as closer to the truth. May Allah be pleased with them all!)
There Is Always Hope for Those Who Enjoin Good and Forbid Evil
If this Supreme Court decision goes through and abortion can be made illegal again in the US, this shows how much effect speaking out against evil can have.
One of the excuses the Compassionate Imams gave for their support of gay marriage and other LGBT rights was that the question of LGBT rights was a done deal and there is no going back, so Muslims should just accept it and move on.
Look at how evil the mentality of these munafiqeen!
Even if it were a done deal, so what? We would never support the fahisha of Qawm Lut. But it obviously is never a done deal. Laws are overturned all the time, and this abortion issue is only the most recent example. There is nothing to say that Qawm Lutism can’t be similarly overturned in the near future as long as we do our part by actually following the sunnah of Prophet Lut. Amr bil-Ma`ruf and nahi `anil-Munkar never stops!
What About Tawhid?
As usual, you will find some Crypto Reformers and Faux Traditionalists, i.e., liberal munifiqeen cosplaying as imams and students of knowledge, say:
“Why should we care what the kuffar do? If they want to do abortion and gay sex, that is nothing compared to shirk. Our only dawah should be about tawhid and conversion to Islam!”
The stupid excuses from these fools become more putrid by the day.
If you look at the dawah of the Quran when it was first revealed and delivered to the Quraysh, it was not exclusively about tawhid. Many initial ayat were dedicated to not burying daughters, not stealing from orphans, feeding the hungry, not taking advantage of travelers and the destitute. Are these Crypto Reformers going to criticize the Quran for not exclusively focusing on tawhid?
The reality is, tawhid has little chance of being accepted in a society full of vice and corruption. We see it with our very own eyes. You think these blue haired, non binary, screaming abortionist queers have to ability to even contemplate Allah, let alone submit to Him? These abominations have become so deformed by the evil forces running rampant in society that the message of tawhid cannot compute with them.
Allah protect us!
Image Credit: Raul Magdalena