Yeah, There Is No Free Speech in Islam, But Secularism Needs Brutal Censorship to Survive

Liberals, secularists, atheists often claim that their secular democracies uphold freedom of speech, whereas Islam doesn’t (and they are correct that Islam doesn’t).

As evidence for the superiority of secularism, they point to the fact that people in secular countries are free to criticize the president, prime minister, or ruling power.

Their view seems to be premised on this simple formula:

A country has freedom of speech if you can criticize the ruling power in that country.

But this formula conceals a critical fact about secular democracies.

Secular democracies allow criticism of the ruler ONLY if that criticism does not threaten the ruling power. If the criticism does pose a threat, then that speech is quickly suppressed.

This is very clear in the history of the West and even in the writing of liberal thinkers like JS Mill. Mill said:

“Despotism is a legitimate mode of government in dealing with barbarians, provided that the end be their improvement.”

Anyone who does not agree with the Enlightened principles of liberalism is by definition of Mill and secularists more generally a barbarian. And the liberal state is justified in silencing the speech of barbarians, or even indefinitely detaining them or “neutralizing” them, i.e., killing them.

This is how the Enlightened colonial powers dealt with Muslims throughout their colonies. Anyone who opposed British, French, or Dutch power was deemed a “fanatic” threat who was to be crushed. And yes, these colonies were managed by liberal secularists. JS Mill, Alexis de Tocqueville, and other “fathers” of secularism were either colonial administrators themselves or advisors to the colonial project!

RELATED: [WATCH] Does Liberalism Require Domination of Islam? DEBATE

These practices have continued to this day. Whether we want to talk about CVE/Prevent programs aimed at Muslims, or we want to talk about government disinformation boards, or we want to talk about tech censorship, these are all secular tactics for suppressing speech.

The liberal state has, in fact, become extremely sophisticated in its ability to censor speech and silence illiberal voices. But, again, this is not new.

Liberal states have always been masters at controlling speech and this is because the existence of liberalism requires mass censorship. Liberalism is so contrary to fundamental human nature that it requires massive technological and institutional control over the population in order to guarantee its persistence.

How funny it is that atheists and secularists want to tout this oppressive system as some kind of savior for the human race!

RELATED: France Shuts Down Muslim Publishers – No “Free Speech” for Muslims

MuslimSkeptic Needs Your Support!
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

4 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
S.F.

I think Atheists and Secularists should also consider secular authoritarian governments such as China and North Korea.

Criticism of those governments is basically illegal.

It would be interesting if an article was produced comparing the western liberalism to an eastern system like China. I’ve always conceived of countries like China as being anti-liberal so it would be interesting to see how they conceive of notions of freedom, equality, justice, rights etc.

Bobj

Assalamu alaykum wa rahmatulloh
In which area of Houston do masajids exist with right people and aqidah, brother Daniel?
Brothers are reverting to Islam and I still don’t know to which one take them where they would understand Quran, Sunnah and follow them accordingly without bid’ah innovation etc. I am new in TX
JazakAllohu khayr

عبدالله

Try reaching him on other platforms as well.
Maybe when he goes live on YT.

Nasik

They are the lesser known, low funded, very small masajid with a non-english speaking Maulana from overseas. These are the best masajid. People don’t like them because they are closer to the Haqq and go against their desires of modernism.