Subscribe
Notify of
guest

10 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
FrenchMuslim

We will never have any peace whatsoever by basing societies on race.
Other than the fact that the world would get fragmented into so many countries based on so many ethnicities, people would commit genocides left right and center because there would be no reason to care for individuals who do not belong to the race you belong to.
Slavery would be back and based on race.
Eugenism will rear it’s ugly end and guys like him will cry when they discover they are not blond/blue eyed enough.

FrenchMuslim

It is impossible that it doesn’t happen, because it would require to go back to low technology. Otherwise you cannot be independent and either deal with other countries (which breaks the isolationist ideology) or conquer and enslave them which is obviously immoral.
And it doesn’t even solve all the “problems”, there are still crimes in such societies, for example Japan, maybe less but it’s also not a good example given how degenerate the Japanese culture is and how the population is declining.

A Mole

It’s entirely possible for independent countries to trade with others. Look at the DPRK, which has been targeted with the highest level of illegal sanctions blockades by the American empire. They have an ideology of ‘juche’ or ‘self-reliance’, and endeavour to be completely self-sufficient in those things that are required in a war situation (as they have been under attack for more than half a century). But they’re perfectly happy to trade with the courageous who also hate the USA.

Anti PC Akhi

Unfortunately, Islamic history is full of racial tensions. Entire empires have fallen due to racial tensions. Starting with very early Ummayads who treated non Arabs as second class mawalis. Thus Abbasid came to power. The tension between Persians and Arabs, Arabs and Turks, Persian and Turks, Mughuls and Persians. Afghan and Mughuls, Afghan and Persians. Entire sects came out of racial tensions. Look at modern Muslim states like Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq, Turkey, all have racial tensions.

Anti PC Akhi

Alhamdulillah for Islam, but we cant act like the atheist here didnt have valid concerns. Islam is the universal binding factor but tribalism is real and ignoring it wont make issues disappear. Read up on Muslim history.

I think denying differences is just another sjw woke = men and women are equal, men can become women vice versa, politically correct narrative based in fiction and emotions. Not reality.

FrenchMuslim

What does it mean to acknowledge differences ? Apart from creating division ?
Yes tribalism exist and will exist forever but that’s why you need to fight it (not physically) forever and ever using the Quran and Sunnah as proof that it shouldn’t exist.
There is simply no room for racism in Islam.
People will always rape and steal, but there’s no point in thinking about the matter, just apply the law (which should be the Sharia) and pray for the best.

Anti PC Akhi

Yes there is no room for racism but lineage, its preservation, and even its preference are established facts within Shariah. Its how inheritance, marriage, and the rights of kin are recognized.

Why you think that in Arab states buying land, citenship, and even marriage is impossible or extremely diffcult? They use shariah to make those laws. Its to preserve the inheritance and lineage of their people.

If you think that all cats are the same, get a lion and leave it in your kids room.

Wee Jim

There is no need to base society on either religion or race.

FrenchMuslim

So how do people unite ?
Because I clearly do not want to share a society with transgender/openly gay liberals and if enough people thought the same, you would have no society.
People currently do unite on a religion : liberalism.
They unite on materialism, entertainment and drugs.

Wee Jim

Does a society need to be “united”? You seem to share the opinion that “A nation is a group of people united by a shared delusion about their ancestry and a common hatred of their neighbours.”
In fact, most muslims say  they do not want to share a society with transgender/openly gay liberals, but they happily do so in practise.

Last edited 12 days ago by Wee Jim