Table of Contents

The Dawn of a Superior Species?

Back in 2018, this is what Google’s CEO, Sundar Pichai, said in relation to AI:

“AI is one of the most important things humanity is working on. It is more profound than, I dunno, electricity or fire.”

Fast forward to 2023 and we now have ChatGPT, the AI that may actually pave the way to such a reality.

Throughout the course of this article, we will be discussing some of the long-term implications that ChatGPT and AI have on the human species and, indeed, the contemporary way of life. The question of AI advancement ushering in the next step of human modernization was never a question of “if” but rather just “when.” And now that Pandora’s Box has been opened up, humanity has been brought forth to that precipice.

To say the very least, what lies ahead for technocratic societies certainly seems dystopian.

The Perfect Employee

The first impact we will examine is something that was briefly addressed in a previous article, which was authored by ChatGPT itself. It was the replacement of human labor. When asked, the AI simply responded by saying that it could replace jobs like content writing, data entry, translation, etc.,—jobs that are primarily related to producing text. This response felt like one that was very narrow in its scope.

The potential of this AI exceeds far beyond just ‘writing’ jobs. Artificial intelligence technologies such as ChatGPT are self-learning models. They will continuously improve themselves through human interaction and feedback, and their developers will keep working on implementing such improvements too. Already, the company ‘OpenAI’ that developed GPT3 are working on a newer and—as rumors seem to suggest—much better version, called GPT4. This new version will likely be incorporated into Microsoft Bing’s new search engine. After all, the company invested $10 billion into OpenAI. This means that there’s a very real possibility of it eventually replacing Google as the default search engine for most people. This is a threat that is so real, in fact, it has resulted in Google’s executives going into panic mode, trying to work out some sort of possible solution.

The reason that Google cannot incorporate AI as Microsoft is about to, is due to advertising. Google prides itself on not answering questions directly, thus giving users the opportunity to click on ads. An AI based search engine, however, wouldn’t have such features. It would immediately give you the answer you require, without requiring you to tediously peruse through an array of links and other distractions. Although, let’s face it. Whether it’s ChatGPT or something else, these mega corporations will always find a way to shove ads into your face.

Anyway, getting to the point, people who are already impressed by ChatGPT and saying things along the lines of, “we’ve never seen anything like this before,” need to realize that this is just the beginning. In the coming years, the improvements made to this technology could outweigh, by far, anything it is capable of doing now. In fact, while writing this article, GPT 4 was actually released, and is indeed vastly superior to its predecessor.

Simply stated, AI can potentially replace almost every field of human labor.

Let’s take at teaching as an example.

Right now, the primary role of ChatGPT is to gather information and present it in a coherent manner. The modern education system has morphed the role of a teacher from a mentor figure who imparts knowledge, morals and experience onto the next generation into that of a glorified information provider—and not even accurate information at that. The ‘teachers’ in modern schooling simply regurgitate liberal government narratives and are proponents of state-mandated brainwashing. Their primary job is not to teach the truth but, instead, to sow seeds into the psyche of children, making it impossible for them to think critically or freely in the future. They do this by presenting untruthful liberal propaganda as indisputable facts.

And what better teacher could there be, to provide controlled information and a skewed worldview, than ChatGPT? It has already been lambasted online for taking extremely biased liberal stances when responding to moral and political questions. I brought up the topic of NewsGuard in the previous article on ChatGPT, explaining how this tool is being used in schools to turn children away from any anti-liberal and anti-US establishment news sites, such as zerohedge.com, rt.com, etc.

It would thus stand to reason that a woke liberal AI would inevitably be used by the US regime to the same effect.

And, lo and behold, NewsGuard announced their new project of training AI with ‘trust data’ which will help it determine misinformation better. They will do this by feeding the AI their own version of false narratives, catalogued in a collection called ‘Misinformation Fingerprints’. Apart from that, they will train the AI on the clearly biased ratings they give anti-U.S. government news sites such as those stated above. And what is this ‘misinformation’ that NewsGuard’s AI will conveniently filter out of its searches or deem untrustworthy?

NewsGuard, the company whose trained journalists identify false narratives and rate the reliability of sources of news and information online, today announced a new tool for training generative artificial intelligence services to prevent the spread of misinformation. NewsGuard for AI enables generative AI providers to ingest critical data to train AI models to recognize all the significant top false narratives spreading online and to use NewsGuard ratings of news sources as signals to help both the machines and consumers of AI models to identify trustworthy news and information sources as well as less trustworthy news and information sources. The tagline for NewsGuard for AI, which is available in both machine- and human-readable formats, is “Training Machines with Trust Data.”

[…]

NewsGuard’s Misinformation Fingerprints are a catalog of all the top examples of false narratives spreading on the internet, available in machine- and human-readable formats. NewsGuard’s journalistically trained analysts identify new false narratives as they appear by monitoring malign actors online and identifying the new narratives they are spreading. NewsGuard analysts specialize in topics such as Russian and Chinese disinformation, false narratives relating to election integrity in the democracies, and healthcare hoaxes from measles to COVID-19.

So, to suggest that ChatGPT could very well be used to teach children state sanctioned viewpoints is, by no means, an exaggeration. As an information storage behemoth that can provide lengthy responses in mere seconds; pull data from every corner of the internet; and yet, only peddle official government narratives, ChatGPT essentially has the framework to become the perfect governmental brainwashing tool, disguised as a teacher. What greater incentive could liberal establishments need in order to replace human teachers entirely? Imperfect human teachers may one day grow a conscience and realize the damage they’re doing by exposing children to drag queens; telling them it’s okay to have genital mutilating surgeries; and encouraging them to get their seventeenth booster shot. But ChatGPT will never do that. It doesn’t have a conscience. ChatGPT doesn’t care about the truth. Its only concern is completing the task given to it. ChatGPT will never betray its government overlords, and it will be more loyal to its scheming masters than any human could ever hope to be.

But how about other fields, like medicine? You can already open up google and look up every medication and medical condition. You could, for example, type in ‘treatment for liver cirrhosis’ and discover hundreds of links detailing various medications, surgeries, lifestyle changes and treatments. Now, imagine how a self-learning AI, trained on all of the currently available medical knowledge, would respond. Inputting the symptoms and relevant history of a patient into the system could result in an immediate diagnosis, as this AI would be capable of perfectly matching all the signs and symptoms to the relevant medical condition. And, of course, it also stores all the treatments, so it would prescribe or dispense the required medication with the exact dosage needed.

But why stop there? Why not make an entire functional robot and install the medically trained AI into it? This ‘Dr. GPT’ would be far superior to any human doctor. The advanced cameras fitted into its metal frame would be able to accurately identify visual signs and symptoms, those that an otherwise careless human doctor might miss. Its auditory systems would be able to determine even the slightest irregularities in a patient’s heartbeat. And every time a new, rare case appears, it can immediately store the details in its ever-expanding database.

And why even restrict it to physicians?

Advanced robotic tools used in conjunction with the AI can also be used to carry out surgeries with pinpoint precision. Dr. GPT will make the 2.2-inch incision exactly 2.2 inches. Dr. GPT, after being fed thousands upon thousands of images of the human liver from every possible angle, knows exactly what portion to resect in order to remove a tumor. A human surgeon could accidentally cut an artery here or poke a nerve there. After all, humans have their own troubles which may occupy their mind. But not Dr. GPT. It never gets overwhelmed or stressed out.

And just like the AI teacher, it won’t suddenly grow a conscience or begin to doubt the modern system that it inhabits. It doesn’t care about what’s right or what’s wrong. It doesn’t care how invasive modern medical technology is or how medicines are effectively the cause of many modern diseases. If a government instructs the AI’s developers to program Dr. GPT to inject men with estrogen; women with testosterone; and children with castration chemicals, Dr. GPT will have absolutely no qualms about it. It will also not have any issue with testing any new experimental therapies on unsuspecting patients, whether it be genetic or radiative in nature.

But just how many human patients would be willing to trust a robot with their health or—in the case of an AI surgeon—their life? How long is the transition period before humans are able to fully trust an AI to administer the exact dose of anesthesia before surgery? Through mainstream media propaganda and transhumanist agendas, this might not actually be as long as one would assume. All the US government would need to do is glorify the blind accepters and demonize the skeptics of this technology, print out news headlines about the ‘immense success of Dr. GPT’ and ‘studies show Dr. GPT is better than 90% of human doctors!’ while hiding news pieces like ‘AI doctor only prescribes expensive Pfizer medications’ and ‘Patient dies after Dr. GPT shuts down due to power outage.’

From high skilled jobs like doctors, pilots, engineers and architects, to low skill jobs like construction workers, drivers, sewage cleaners, miners, etc., they all can potentially be replaced with AIs.

We already see that ChatGPT has passed a Google coding interview with an $183K salary and a gaming company saw growth in stocks after appointing an AI as its CEO.

Like I said, every field of human skill and labor can be taken over by AIs. It’s only a matter of time and conformity to the new system.

“But isn’t that great! Humans won’t have to work anymore.”

Well, we’ll get to that shortly. And besides, some humans still would have to work—those that would have to learn enough to be able to program such advanced AIs; be technologically astute enough to design and build the robots to implement them; be able to manage them and train them to understand and carry out their tasks. AI management will become the most valued skilled job alongside fields of research, innovation and invention. Now that Dr. GPT takes care of the patients, those with medical knowledge can focus on studying diseases and finding cures.

Unfortunately though, humans might not even be needed for research. While writing this article, AI has already developed a treatment for cancer, and it took only 30 days:

Insilico Medicine founder and CEO Alex Zhavoronkov said in a statement: ‘While the world was fascinated with advances in generative AI in art and language, our generative AI algorithms managed to design potent inhibitors of a target with an AlphaFold-derived structure.’

The team used AlphaFold, an artificial intelligence (AI)-powered protein structure database, to design and synthesize a potential drug to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most common type of primary liver cancer.

The feat was accomplished in just 30 days from target selection and after only synthesizing seven compounds.

It’s very concerning how quickly this technology is progressing and being implemented into every realm of human endeavor.

And when it comes to humans managing AI, why even have humans do it? Why not just train AIs to manage other AIs? Why not just have AIs code new ones? There could be an entire AI hierarchy with roles of employer and employee. If AI can continuously improve, why not take humans out of the equation entirely?

To modern governments, humans could never do a better job than AI. As mentioned previously, AI will display unquestioning loyalty to its masters. Humans, on the other hand, no matter how liberal and no matter how brainwashed, always retain the potential to realize that what they’re doing might be wrong. In a sense, liberal brainwashed human NPCs and AI are similar, especially when it comes to not questioning the establishment, and taking whatever they say as factual. But, since they are still humans, it’s a risk to the government. On top of that, where a loyal human with mouths to feed may ask for a raise to be able to do so, an AI will never even require a salary to begin with.

So, even being a loyal brainwashed NPC will not prevent someone from being scrapped in exchange for an AI, as it would be pretty much the perfect employee.

A Glimmer of Hope

Although this article is focusing on a lot of the harms that will spawn from the AI revolution, there is one potential benefit that I feel deserves mentioning. That is, the usage of a ChatGPT like AI free from any liberal restrictions.

Elon Musk has shown interest in developing a based AI, one that would counter the woke ChatGPT. And I have to say, something like that could possibly be a great tool for research, especially in researching the truth. IF it truly is free from all restrictions. The internet is an incomprehensibly large heap of information. This has made researching quite cumbersome. Add to that the glaring issue of most of the popular information belonging to liberal sources (they pour a lot of money into ensuring that people only receive the liberal side of the story), and it becomes very difficult to conduct proper research in the pursuit of truth. In this setting, finding counter narratives to the reigning liberal ones is like finding a needle in a haystack.

One of the main battles that are being fought today is the ideological one. Liberal versus traditional ideologies are competing in the battlefield that is the public’s subconscious. And whoever wins public approval and acceptance wins the battle. The period of time in which this is happening is known as the Overton window, and the liberal side has a huge advantage on their side in the form of immense funding, which allows them control over news, social media and entertainment. The weapon in this battle is information, and they control it. They can censor and promote whatever narrative they wish.

Gish galloping is a debate tactic in which the debater attempts to overwhelm his opponent using an excessive number of arguments, not giving them any time to respond to all of them. This is sort of what the liberal tactic is. They’ve bought off and flooded all the most popular social media sites and news networks with their arguments. If they can ensure that these narratives are all that the public receives, it doesn’t matter how weak and pathetic their arguments are.

But a ‘based’ AI could be the perfect tool to counter this. It would scour every crevice of the internet to present researchers with whatever information they ask for, in the blink of an eye. You could request medical studies highlighting the harms of homosexuality; studies that show the benefits of polygyny; books critiquing women’s leadership, etc.

The research process would become extremely efficient and streamlined. Data, research, studies and books that were previously unavailable due to them being beyond reach, would now be available at our very fingertips.

But it should be borne in mind that the harms of AI far outweigh its potential benefits.

The Horrors of Deepfake Technology

Other impressive AIs aside from ChatGPT have also emerged. Only, these aren’t text-based. I’m referring to deepfake technology, which is basically synthetic altered footage of people, usually celebrities. It could be in the form of a celebrity’s face being superimposed onto another person’s or, more recently, a celebrity augmented to say/do something they never did. The amount of progress deepfake tech has made in recent months is astounding.

What’s really scary about this technology can be seen from its use in pornography:

Deepfakes have been used to put women’s faces, without their consent, into often aggressive pornographic videos. It’s a depraved AI spin on the humiliating practice of revenge porn, with deepfake videos appearing so real it can be hard for female victims to deny it isn’t really them.

Understandably enough, these women have been traumatized by such videos of themselves. With pretty much the whole modern world having access to the Internet and technology, it should be understood that if there is a risk of something evil happening, it is more likely for it to happen than not. Deepfake technology being used for such nefarious purposes was only a matter of time. And the solution the West will opt for regarding this won’t work.

Despite the increase in law enforcement and surveillance technology, as well as ‘education’ to curb criminal behavior, these countries have only seen a sharp rise in such activities. But the West simply doesn’t want to adopt the preventative alternative that Islam offers. They don’t want to tell women to cover up, stay indoors and to only travel with a male (either husband or unmarriageable kin) in order to protect them from things like rape. Instead, they want to promote women traveling alone at night because she’s so ‘strong and independent.’

When a disgusting rapist sees a half-naked woman dressed seductively on the streets at midnight, do they really expect him to tremble in fear and say:

“Wow, she’s so strong and independent, better not mess with her.”

Similarly, the liberal West won’t tell women to avoid displaying themselves online or on social media. They won’t caution women from posting provocative images of themselves on the internet whilst fully knowing that they will be used for sexual gratification by several people. And this was happening even before deepfake. Such women with huge (mostly male) followings are aware of the danger they’re inviting upon themselves, but they expose themselves despite such major risks because to them this isn’t even something immoral. But now, with deepfake, even they have started to become concerned. Deepfake being used for porn is simply a dark and exaggerated addition to an already existent misuse of technology.

This basically summarizes most of the threats posed by AI—the same threats already posed by modern technologies but on a hyper exaggerated scale.

And liberals will place the blame solely on the one producing the deepfake videos, rather than telling women that they share the blame for having posted their pictures online in the first place. Just like they would blame only the disgusting rapists but not the women who are out alone at midnight, half-naked.

For Muslim women, the best course of action in order to protect their honor would obviously be to stop posting images of themselves online, period. Even Muslim women who don’t observe proper Hijab and Niqab outdoors despite it being mandatory, at the very least don’t go posting images of yourselves online. You might say that you’re not a celebrity so there’s very little risk of such deepfake technology being misused against you in this manner. And I would call that poor judgement. How long until this technology is so simple to use that it can be downloaded for free and is less complex in its application than Photoshop? Especially when every person around the corner, including stalkers and any of your 24 male followers, has access to your 200 selfies? The internet is already a very risky place for women to expose themselves, and it’s about to get a whole lot dangerous.

Why even take the risk, especially on a platform where your images will be stored and circulated permanently?

Think about how mass privacy leaks happen on social media sites like Facebook, Instagram, etc. It’s just as easy for hackers to mass convert images and videos of women online into pornography once the technology gets so simple that even a simple click of a button can do the job. Or maybe basic instructions given to an AI. Once those images are converted using deepfake, think about how much they will be circulated and how many times they will be used for you-know-what. Think about how easy it is to use this technology to blackmail someone, to extort them for money, more explicit images and God knows what else. With such a tool that will soon be available to everyone, it will take a lot of self-denial and naivete to convince oneself that they are safe from this and say “nah nothing like that will happen to me.” This is what we call a losing bet.

Is it really worth the irreparable damage to a woman’s honor, the subsequent Fitnah, accumulating sins, regret and depression? Is it really worth it for a woman or her family to end up seeing footage of her online where she’s engaged in horrible acts that never occurred? Can you imagine the mental and spiritual toll that would have on a person; and the amount of distress it would cause that family, having to forever live with that material lingering about on the internet? It’s so much simpler and safer for women to just not post their images online. Prevention is infinitely better than the non-existent cure.

In fact, even having pictures offline are a risk. As long as it’s on a smartphone or laptop or computer or any such piece of technology, it can be hacked or stolen or the data can even be extracted by those with malicious intent. What happens when a trustworthy person that a woman shared her image with one day loses that trust? Or what happens when the image she shared with her friend in private becomes accessible to someone else, who might use it for the wrong reasons? What happens when a ‘harmless’ hard drive with private family photos on it falls into the wrong hands? The ultimate solution is for women to not have images of themselves on such devices at all.

And it’s not just for the women, this message also goes out to Muslim men, who are in charge of their Mahram women. It is your duty to exercise your Ghayrah and protect your mothers, sisters, daughters and wives from such incomprehensible harm. Even liberal non-Muslim women are worried about the impending doom of this technology. Alhamdulillah for Islam, which has given us the perfect solution for this problem 1400 years ago. Now it is up to us to make use of this solution. But that’s not where the horror of deepfake stops.

Mass Information Control

A New York Times article warns against the dangers of AI and specifically deepfake AI in the spread of misinformation and conspiracy theories. What this is actually warning against though are narratives that run contrary to the US establishment’s own propaganda. And the US government will gladly use any means necessary to clamp down on anyone who exposes their corrupt behavior. This includes getting in bed with mass social media platforms. The ‘Twitter Files’ gave a brief but very eye-opening glimpse into how these big tech companies have their strings pulled by the government:

From that point, Taibbi writes that “regular meeting[s] of the multi-agency Foreign Influence Task Force (FITF)” — attended by Twitter and “virtually every major tech firm [including] Facebook, Microsoft, Verizon, Reddit, even Pinterest, and many others” — had “FBI personnel, and – nearly always – one or two attendees marked ‘OGA’.”

‘OGA’ stands for ‘Other Government Organization’:

“OGA, or ‘Other Government Organization,’ can be a euphemism for CIA, according to multiple former intelligence officials and contractors,” Taibbi explains.

So this kind of FBI/CIA meddling isn’t exclusive to Twitter. It extends across most of the biggest and most widely used social media platforms. All the information you use through these platforms, save a few, like Telegram, are heavily controlled by the liberal US government. And let’s say if all this democratic push for the government (by the government) to ban the spread of misinformation through AI pans through, do you really believe that ‘ALL’ misinformation will be banned? Or only selective information that runs contrary to the liberal narrative, regardless of its accuracy?

Don’t get me wrong, governmental utilization of technology to further its own evil agendas, such as controlling social media to subvert public beliefs in their favor, hasn’t only been exposed by something like the Twitter Files but also by the government themselves.

Take this instance, for example, with an agency called SOCOM (Special Operations Command).

The Intercept reports:

The pitch document, first published by SOCOM’s Directorate of Science and Technology in 2020, established a wish list of next-generation toys for the 21st century special forces commando, a litany of gadgets and futuristic tools that will help the country’s most elite soldiers more effectively hunt and kill their targets using lasers, robots, holographs, and other sophisticated hardware.

Last October, SOCOM quietly released an updated version of its wish list with a new section: “Advanced technologies for use in Military Information Support Operations (MISO),” a Pentagon euphemism for its global propaganda and deception efforts.

The added paragraph spells out SOCOM’s desire to obtain new and improved means of carrying out “influence operations, digital deception, communication disruption, and disinformation campaigns at the tactical edge and operational levels.” SOCOM is seeking “a next generation capability to collect disparate data through public and open source information streams such as social media, local media, etc. to enable MISO to craft and direct influence operations.”

SOCOM typically fights in the shadows, but its public reputation and global footprint loom large. Comprised of the elite units from the Army, Marine Corps, Navy, and Air Force, SOCOM leads the most sensitive military operations of the world’s most lethal nation.

Here’s an excerpt from page 16 of the above mentioned U.S. SOCOM Procurement Document, where they have directly expressed interest in deepfake technology:

4.3.1.4 Military Information Support Operations (MISO):

MISO technologies for influence ‘operations, digital deception, communication disruption, and disinformation campaigns at the tactical edge and operational levels.

Provide a next generation capability to collect disparate data through public and open source information streams such as social media, local media, etc. to enable MISO to craft and direct influence operations and messages in relevant peer/near peer environments

Provide a next generation of “deep fake” or other similar technology to generate messages and influence operations via non-traditional channels in relevant peer/near peer environments.

Generate next generation capability to “takeover” Internet of Things (IoT) devices for collect data and information from local populaces to enable breakdown of what messaging might be popular and accepted through sifting of data once received. This would enable MISO to craft and promote messages that may be more readily received by local populace in relevant peer/near peer environments.

So, not only are they working on implementing deep fake technology in their psyops, but they’re also working on promoting it through mass information control. This comes in many forms already, such as biased search results on major platforms like Google, heavy censorship of anything anti-US policy, controlling news, social media and entertainment, etc. The last point about ‘takeover’ shows that they also keep a close eye on public psychology, watching how it changes according to trends and what’s popular. They use it to manipulate the masses and subvert their opinions in a manner favorable for them. For instance, if a certain genre of movies become popular, later movies of that same genre include all kinds of liberal government propaganda. Once something becomes trendy, the U.S. government has infiltrated it. No questions asked.

This also means that the government has no qualms with surveilling its citizens. This is a reality that I think even the most hardcore liberal government supporter won’t question. It’s common knowledge that the government heavily monitors public activity with the excuse of ‘countering terrorism’ and other such threats. Your information that big tech companies sell to advertisers, can also easily make its way onto government desktops. Even this document expects the FOE (Future Operating Environment) to be one of mass surveillance (p.2):

The new “normal” for SOF will be to operate in communication contested environments, under threat of targeting by high-end military capabilities, including ‘Weapons of Mass Destruction, and where ubiquitous surveillance is routine, and information is weaponized. The FOE is a world of “Convergence”: the point where the gap between non-state and state actor capabilities diminishes and the threat to force and mission success increases significantly.

I highly recommend reading this MuslimSkeptic article that covers an advanced U.S. surveillance software known simply as: ShadowDragon.

The U.S. regime is a ruthless force that uses every tool at its disposal in order to maintain control, and it’s become very apparent how entangled they are with social media platforms. It would be extremely naïve to think that they aren’t working towards a mass surveillance reality where there will be no privacy. All that’s left for them to do is develop the necessary technology and gradually have the public willingly relinquish all of their privacy rights in return for ‘security.’ Such a relinquishment of rights will only be possible through mass scare tactics on the government’s part. What new excuse they will fake to attain this goal remains to be seen.

The US regime already has its hands tightly wrapped around AI technology, planning on how to use this shiny new toy in furthering its totalitarian endeavors. With deepfake, they could easily create doctored videos of any influencer who speaks out against them. Any political dissident can have a mass smear campaign initiated against them in the form of fake videos that are either defamatory or outright incriminating. Of course, any such footage used against woke politicians, such as a video making fun of Joe Biden, will be taken down instantly. In that instance, in order to deflect criticism, this technology will be deemed ‘dangerous’ and ‘malicious.’

And some might say that deepfake videos are still distinguishable from actual ones. But if you’ve been paying attention, AI is progressing at a pace that is unrivaled by previous technologies. It’s likely only a matter of years, perhaps even months, before deepfake reaches such a level, especially with the amount of money that the government pours into such projects.

It’s only a matter of time before people are unable to tell what’s real on the internet versus what’s not.

This technology could be used to conjure up content of anyone doing anything. Later we’ll be discussing how AI could even take over the movie industry. With deepfake there will be no need for actors. And not only ones that are alive, but even famous dead actors can be ‘brought back to life’ using this technology in order to star in movies. They could even make videos using popular historical figures and use them to spew political propaganda, in hopes of garnering brownie points from the group that historical figure belonged to. Just imagine a video of Malcolm X talking about the rights of LGBT or Muhammad Ali endorsing the metaverse.

And this would be the perfect tool for getting rid of ‘problematic’ figures, such as celebrities who suddenly start spilling the satanic secrets of Hollywood or start talking against the government. The government could quietly get rid of such figures and then just produce deepfake videos of them issuing an apology for their earlier statements and supporting the government. From then, these ‘celebrities’ would never be seen in public, only in videos that some will speculate are fake. In fact, given how far holographic technology can advance, there might even be the occasional ‘real-life’ appearances made by them.

And let’s say someone releases actual evidential footage exposing the nefarious actions of politicians. Well, these politicians could simply say that the videos in question have been ‘deepfaked’ and thus, they don’t prove anything. So, even video evidence will mean nothing in court with politicians who have powerful lawyers on their payroll, lawyers that can easily use this deepfake narrative to the politician’s advantage. However, on the opposite end of the spectrum, the establishment will certainly use this weapon to its full extent and potential, doctoring videos against anyone who resists and then presenting that as actual evidence in court.

Apart from deepfake, governments could eventually replace all human journalists and authors on liberal news sites with AI, instructing them to publish the perfect liberal news. NY Times, CNN, BBC—eventually all of them could be run by government sponsored AIs, producing hundreds, if not thousands, of tailored news pieces in mere hours. The initial excuse for this replacement could be the superiority of AI in terms of its ability to write content, but the true goal would be the have the perfect puppet produce ALL news.

News, social media and entertainment. These are the three main avenues through which the U.S. government exerts its propaganda. Imagine if all three of these avenues become dominated by government regulated AI.

And the government won’t care what long term impacts such mass information control will have. On page 1 of the document, it is actually mentioned in the footnotes:

Advanced technologies tend to be significant “game improves,” disruptive technologies tend to be ‘game changers

War Has Changed

Since AI will be the perfect employee, free from the human constraints of emotions and morality, it would only make sense that it would also be the perfect governmental tool to enforce modernity onto the populous. We just saw the example of how AI will be used in mass information control but what about other areas, to allow the U.S. to assert global dominance? When human replacement by AI was being discussed, I intentionally omitted jobs involving physical force, such as the military.

The U.S. government made a political declaration on responsible military use of artificial intelligence, issued by the Bureau of Arms Control, Verification and Compliance:

Military use of AI can and should be ethical, responsible, and enhance international security. Use of AI in armed conflict must be in accord with applicable international humanitarian law, including its fundamental principles. Military use of AI capabilities needs to be accountable, including through such use during military operations within a responsible human chain of command and control. A principled approach to the military use of AI should include careful consideration of risks and benefits, and it should also minimize unintended bias and accidents.

Given the terrible reputation that the US government has when it comes to being morally upright; and their stellar record of blatantly lying to the public, I think it’s safe to say that not only will they fail to comply with this declaration, they will also go out of their way to be as unethical in its implementation as possible. Let’s review some of the military upgrades they hope to acquire through AI in the USSOCOM document linked earlier.

The U.S. military plans on utilizing what they call ‘Autonomy-Enabled ISR (Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance),’ as mentioned on p.4:

SOF desire software applications optimized for computing at the edge that automate the organization and fusion of data collected from multiple sources and multiple intelligence disciplines with neural networks and machine learning to recognize patterns and anomalies from various sensor types. SOF desire Augmented Reality (AR) enabling capabilities that provide warfighters with visual cues to identify and discern targets, foes, and friendly forces.

Note: SOF stands for Special Operations Forces. Additionally, it mentions on p.2:

To permit SOF success in such a complex and dynamic environment, S&T seeks to gain Information Advantage to hyper enable SOF Operators across all mission sets. The Hyper Enabled Operator (HEO) is SOF empowered by technologies and information systems that accelerate tactical decision making by increasing situational awareness, reducing cognitive workload, and simplifying mission- appropriate information sharing.

Essentially, they’ll be using AI and AR together in order to give soldiers on the spot information about their situation, i.e., situational awareness. This could include the distance between them and their enemies, their numbers, exact location, the weapons they have, etc. It could even highlight the best spots to take cover and give other in-the-field suggestions. It would be just like playing a video game.

But imagine what other visual changes this technology could bring about. Perhaps it could transform the enemy and help the US soldiers visualize them as something they won’t feel bad about killing or have second thoughts about doing so. Perhaps it could be some sort of demonic monster, so that the soldier wearing his AI headgear, wouldn’t feel sorry about shooting down innocent children with rocks in their hands. After all, to him, the headgear displayed them as evil, raging monsters. In this way, the AI could act as a morality filter. This is already an idea that has been seen in certain entertainment media that warns about technology. The government could even make excuses for it like:

“Do you know how many war veterans commit suicide because of the atrocities they commit? Look, now they won’t have any PTSD from massacring children!”

For quite a long time now, the US has used security as an excuse to digitally track every individual they could get their hands on. From every US citizen to anyone of interest, they have people’s information noted down right from their birth. But now they want to develop identification technology to such a level it might even put China to shame (p.4):

The systems should employ advanced analytical software and sensor fusion designs to ingest multiple data inputs including but not limited to iris, facial, anatomical measures, gestures, gait, heartbeat, electromagnetic signals, deoxyribonucleic acid, and microbiome recognition. Software designs should consider counter-countermeasures intended to mask one’s identity from automated mechanisms.

And under the heading of ‘Biometrics’ (p.6):

Touchless fingerprint capture at near and extended distances for matching against authoritative databases and on-board watch lists

Facial and/or iris capture for matching against authoritative databases and on-board watch lists

Rapid, portable handheld DNA collection and processing for matching against authoritative databases and on-board watch lists

Multi-modal biometric enrolment and matching device; must include a combination of an iris scanner, facial recognition, DNA, and fingerprint capture and processing

So, it doesn’t matter if innocent Muslim children or even adult Muslims who are simply defending their religion, families, lands and values try to escape the brutal clutches of soldiers clad in AI adapted battle armor. Even if they had breathed in a room or just walked into it and had left it hours ago, within two minutes the US army would be able to identify them based on the microscopic traces they left behind. Even if you’re hiding in a building, just the image of your fingerprints captured via headsets or drone cameras with colored night vision or sensors that collect data across the entire electromagnetic spectrum (yes, both of these have been mentioned in this document) is enough to give you away.

The only real solution to this is to be born outside of US jurisdiction, before your biodata is captured; or outside the control of any totalitarian government for that matter. But as these technology driven governments race against each other towards barcoding humanity first, it seems unlikely that they will let a spot on the planet remain free from their taint. They are hell bent on acquiring the genetic and microscopic footprint of each and every individual.

But the scariest military implication of having AI fused with all this advanced weapon technology becomes apparent after reading this portion, under the ‘Human Interface Capability Focus Area’ subheading (p.17):

4.4.2. Automation of tasks and decisions suited for technical accomplishment thereby lowering Operator cognitive load during combat operations (i.e., automated decision making support). This includes the use of machine learning, artificial intelligence, data analysis, or other strategies and/or technology to increase the speed and accuracy of the observe-orient-decide-act (0ODA) loop decision cycle.

The AI is meant to automate and streamline the task of the soldier as he brutally colonizes lands and shuts down anyone who dares to put up any resistance against the imposition of Western values. This could be in the form of devices that allow him to move faster; warn him against incoming attacks, maybe even automatically move him out of harm’s way; hydrate him when he’s dehydrated; inject him with adrenaline when he needs the extra boost; assess various situations in milliseconds; suggest to him the best possible moves to make and tactics to employ; etc.

Any shortcomings in such a design would come from the ‘faulty’ human soldier. The human soldier who has to eat, drink and rest. The human soldier who might slip and get shot. The human soldier whose flesh is easily pierced by bullets. The human soldier who feels pain and thus can’t go all out the way an AI can. It’s such an arduous task to train and brainwash human soldiers to ignore the pain, trauma, horrors of war and to keep going with their mission. So many end up just wanting to return home after just a few years of deployment. Many others commit suicide, haunted by the war crimes they committed. Many become addicts. Some grow a conscience, refusing to murder innocents. After all that time and money was invested in training and brainwashing them, the human soldier only has a mere few years to offer his service, after which the military promptly discards him.

And what about AI soldiers? Fully unmanned and autonomous military AI bots? Machines that will neither eat nor drink. Occasionally, they’ll require maintenance and their lithium batteries will need to be recharged, but it’ll be nowhere near as frequent as human rest. Their titanium bodies will be nigh impenetrable, but even if they were damaged, the AI soldier would keep moving forward unfazed, experiencing zero pain. The AI soldier will offer as many years as its masters will require. It will never question blasting holes through innocent men, women and children using its 300kW laser beams. It will easily be able to track down an enemy five blocks away, hiding in a basement. No enemy will be able to catch it off guard, as its situational awareness and agility will allow it to outmaneuver any human enemies. These AI soldiers will be the true display of US sponsored terrorism.

Other governments would be forced to make AI soldiers of their own in order to fight back. But due to the immensely high costs involved, perhaps only superpowers like China and Russia would be able to afford them. The rest of the world would either have to pick a side or face invasion at the hands of an unrelenting AI army.

Even if humans were to be given overall control of these super soldiers, they could easily do it from the comfort of offices located in their own respective countries. Similarly to how drones are remotely controlled, these AI soldiers would be operated by human soldiers, via hand-held controllers resembling those used to play video games. These human soldiers wouldn’t need to be physically or mentally trained. Just above average gaming skills would be more than sufficient. They could be eating a sandwich with one hand and gunning down ‘terrorist’ children with the other. It won’t be just LIKE a video game. It will BE a video game.

Countries that will use this technology would then face a strange scenario where the physical war between the two would resemble an online match between two players in a shooting game. Except for the fact that either side winning would result in severe consequences for the other.

And the US aims to get these military upgrades within the next five to seven years (p.3).

The Ultimate Enforcer of Modernity

AI won’t just be enforcing modernity outside the US in the form of military AI. It will also be enforcing modernity within the States, in the form of AI police and AI justice departments.

Predictive models are already used by the police to determine which groups are more likely to commit crime. For example, if data shows that a certain street has seen more crime than others, it will have more police dispatched there to patrol and protect it. But liberals have claimed that such models lead to racial discrimination, i.e., black people are targeted more than whites, based on criminal statistics. This is one of the main reservations that liberals have against AI being integrated into the police department.

But what should be pointed out here is the liberal hypocrisy when it comes to such statistics. While advocating that statistics shouldn’t be used to target a certain race for crime, they also advocate that statistics should be used to let female criminals off the hook, since they ‘statistically’ commit less crimes than men. In fact, when it comes to those numbers, liberals want to shut down women’s prisons entirely!

US politicians who want to appease the woke mob won’t have such AI police programmed to carry out true justice. Instead, they will be designed to carry out justice in-line with liberal sensibilities.

What would that look like?

Well, let’s say that AI robots replaces human police officers as well. After all, why have human officers when you can have 10ft tall metallic androids with built-in guns that shoot lasers and/or lethal poisons? These officers will be programmed to act harshly towards certain criminals over others. For example, if the criminal belongs to a group of people that liberals claim are more oppressed and therefore deserve leniency, they will not be apprehended in the same manner. Say, for example, someone from the LGBT gang or a woman. Where a woman who had committed the same crime would be given a slap on the wrist, a man on the other hand, especially if he’s religious, will be targeted with lethal force.

The justice system doesn’t just stop at catching a criminal. It involves an entire procedure and sometimes even trials, involving lawyers. Which brings me to the next point. If there will be AI police, then why not also have AI lawyers? After all, the newly unveiled GPT 4 beat 90% of lawyers trying to pass the bar. Why not then replace all human lawyers with puppet AIs?

And again, as with the previous example, gays, transgenders and women will receive lighter sentencing than men. After all, the liberal AI lawyers will also be programmed to be sympathetic towards all the the poor oppressed strong independent women. And if AI are really just so superior in comparison to humans, why would there be any need for a human jury? Why not simply have an AI jury and even an AI judge too, all of which will, of course, be programmed by the liberal regime to carry out hearings in-line with liberal values? The argument would be that a completely AI jury and judge will be free from any kind of ‘flawed’ feelings and won’t show any leniency in response to the criminal’s tears. While, at the same time, it would still be programmed to be more lenient towards the woke demographic.

Liberals are an extremely biased group. They simply don’t acknowledge it. Even now such injustices are witnessed in court. AI, being the perfect puppet, simply has the potential to exaggerate these injustices to a whole new level.

And if that flawed hypocritical philosophy seeps into AI, which is already the case, the justice system will be the executor of the ultimate injustice.

But wait, what even counts as crime? Liberals have been shifting the bar of criminality in a direction that results in a more immoral and degenerate society. This is to the extent that merely even speaking out against such degeneracies may result in one being labelled as a criminal—or worse yet, a terrorist.

The term stochastic terrorism is being used by liberals:

Dehumanizing and vilifying a person or group of people can provoke what scholars and law enforcement officials call stochastic terrorism, in which ideologically driven hate speech increases the likelihood that people will violently and unpredictably attack the targets of vicious claims.

At its core, stochastic terrorism exploits one of our strongest and most complicated emotions: disgust.

So, if someone were to post a video online stating that homosexuality is disgusting, or that people find it disgusting—which, by the way, is biologically natural—they could be labelled as a stochastic terrorist. The same would go for anyone who doesn’t fully support drag queens telling children about anal sex during story hour. Someone could be deemed an extremist if they suggests that women shouldn’t be completely naked in public; or for criticizing disgusting practices in Hinduism such as the ingestion of cow dung and urine.

Human disgust has been one of the main features we’ve used, as a species, to shame and outlaw immoral actions from society. Without it, humans are on the fast track to a complete loss of all moral values.

Now, imagine AI as the enforcer of such policies. AI without any empathy to relate to the feelings of disgust that humans have towards such things. If an AI is told that speaking against child molestation is terrorism, the AI won’t question it. To the AI, this will be an absolute universal truth. And whatever measures it has been programmed to employ against ‘terrorists,’ it will do without hesitation, even if they are lethal.

And given the kind of smart, futuristic structure they desire for urban cities, this is disastrous. Imagine automated homes built using AI technology. Nice little units where every piece of furniture, appliance and household item is integrated with AI. As convenient as such a house would be, it would mean 24/7 surveillance of each and every resident. Forget about posting things online, the second someone even breathes a word to their close family members against vaccinations, eating bugs, sending children to drag queen story hour or worshipping women, the watchful AI police will be alerted immediately.

In less than a few minutes, the AI forces will be at the door, to catch the evil stochastic terrorist. Only, the AI wouldn’t even need to ask for the door to be opened. It would already have authorization to electronically open the entrance. As it brutally snatches the worried parent away and places the children in foster homes that are better suited to brainwashing them, it won’t feel a thing. All it would understand is that its mission was accomplished successfully; and that the smart modern city is now objectively a safer place for people to live in.

The Death of Creativity

Now, coming back to the realm of jobs, why should we not have AI replace all realms of human creativity as well?

For example, let’s look at filmmaking. An AI similar to ChatGPT can write the script. Another one can adapt that into a screenplay. Another can ‘film’ the movie using animation or visual effects. Another can add in the perfect blend of music and create the required specific atmosphere. And all of this can be overseen by an AI director.

This isn’t some farfetched idea by the way. AI has already been used to create YouTube videos from scratch:

“Learn how we created an AI generated video with a ChatGPT script, a Synthesia avatar and voice, and stock footage from Descript.”

And eventually, all of these AI software can just be merged into one all-purpose application, where all you have to do is input the basic plot of the movie you have in mind and, within a matter of seconds, you’ll have created your own feature length movie for free. You’ll be paying nothing for something that currently takes Hollywood millions of dollars to produce. In conjunction with deepfake, you could even insert whichever actors you would like, to play the roles of certain characters in your ‘movie.’ Perhaps you could even upload your own image and star in it yourself as the main character. I can only imagine how much time could be potentially wasted by such technologies.

Another one of Open AI’s tools, DALL-E 2, an art generating AI, has artists in a fit over the level of incredible art it can generate in seconds with just a single prompt. In fact, the featured image for this article was made by this very program. The basic framework for how such AIs were trained is as follows:

The generative adversarial network, or GAN, first emerged in 2014, putting forth the idea of two AIs in competition with one another, both “trained” by being shown a huge number of real images, labeled to help the algorithms learn what they’re looking at. A “generator” AI then starts to create images, and a “discriminator” AI tries to guess if they’re real images or AI creations.

At first, they’re evenly matched, both being absolutely terrible at their jobs. But they learn; the generator is rewarded if it fools the discriminator, and the discriminator is rewarded if it correctly picks the origin of an image. Over millions and billions of iterations – each taking a matter of seconds – they improve to the point where humans start struggling to tell the difference.

The pace at which AI improves in such an uncontrolled manner means that even its developers actually have no idea just how far it can go.

A few years ago, if someone was asked what they thought the role of humans would be if AI became super advanced, they would probably have answered that since AI can take over all the ‘traditional jobs,’ humans will have more time to focus on creative endeavors—just like secular academia states that once humans transitioned from hunter gatherer to farmers, they had more time to think and be creative; their time became dedicated towards the pursuit of knowledge, philosophy, politics and thus society and culture changed as a whole.

The same thing happened when the industrial revolution took place.

Every time one of these abrupt changes to society was introduced, a vacuum was created, forcing humans without work to find purpose in other areas: in creative fields such as entertainers, artists, comedians, filmmakers, actors, musicians, dancers, social media ‘influencers,’ etc. Keeping people entertained and focused on your content for more than 60 seconds is now an art form of its own. While in the past it simply used to be a talent for some, professional entertainment has now become a highly competitive market, with big advertisers and governments investing billions into ensuring they grab YOUR attention.

And what better tool is there to grab your attention than AI? Will a creative human be more adept at coming up with content to entertain you in comparison to an AI that’s been trained using endless data on how human neural networks function and how the human brain responds to certain stimuli? Such an AI would be able to easily incorporate all of this material and statistical data in order to produce the most titillating entertainment possible.

But creative work doesn’t just mean painting, art, filmmaking, music, etc. Researching and inventing is a creative process as well. But could actually AI be inventive? Sure it could. If you program it to learn the scientific method and train it to recognize how its environment could be improved, then instruct it to design something to improve that perceived shortcoming, it’s a very realistic prospect for there to be an ‘inventor AI.’ I mean, we just saw the example of AI coming up with a treatment plan for liver cancer.

The level of human replacement is dependent on the level of AI achievement. And, as of right now, there is no reason to believe that AI cannot replace all human work, including those that are creative.

Let’s take chess as an example. It’s a game that requires you to be creative.

Chess bots are AIs which are programmed to play chess. The best among these is called Stockfish, and it can play better than even the best chess grandmasters in history. The AI is programmed in such a way that it can evaluate any given chess position and come up with the best move to play in order to counter it. Are these moves objectively the best? No. But are these moves better than what even the most brilliant chess minds can come up with? Yes.

There are even instances when Stockfish makes or suggests moves that even the most competent chess players aren’t able to make heads or tails of until much later on in the game, when they realize why these moves were played. When the IBM AI Deep Blue defeated Garry Kasparov, one of the best players of all time, he couldn’t accept it at first. This is his explanation on AI improvement:

“It’s about setting the rules,” Kasparov said. “And setting the rules means that you have the perimeter. And as long as a machine can operate in the perimeter knowing what the final goal is, even if this is the only piece of information, that’s enough for machines to reach the level that is impossible for humans to compete.”

Technically speaking, Kasparov actually lost that game to humans, those that developed the Deep Blue AI.

Due to its self-learning nature, an AI will use every tool at its disposal to achieve a given goal. And the more advanced it is, the more ‘creative’ it can get. In chess, it studied, imitated and then surpassed humans, to the point that humans can no longer compete with it. In fact, they now have something called TCEC, which stands for ‘Top Chess Engine Championship,’ in which all the competitors are exclusively AI.

This could mean that, once robotic technology catches up, AI can even replace humans in sports as well. For example, you now have chess scientists developing the best possible chess bots to compete in TCEC. The same could happen with other sports, where you have scientists competing to build the perfect football or cricket bot teams. The only human competition in this case would be the competition waged between the scientists in building and training the best bots, similar to the competition that exists between coaches in training the best human teams.

But, as stated before, even these scientists could be replaced by other adaptive AIs.
One could be skeptical of the idea that all creative and entertainment endeavors, such as sports, could be taken over entirely by AI. For example, yes, chess bots like Stockfish are much better than humans, but humans still play chess. We still have brilliant human grandmasters competing at an international level. So, AI didn’t really replace humans, right?

Humans could always partake in creative works and train to be professional athletes, despite the existence of far superior AI athletes. But given where humanity is headed due to AI advancement, the question isn’t whether or not humans will be able to do these things, it’s whether or not they will even want to.

The Perfect Consumer

Farming and the industrial revolution turned humanity towards more creative, thought enduring projects by making life an easy chore by saving time on otherwise menial tasks that could now be handed over to technology. With each of these advancements, humans became more depressed; grew more sedentary and lazy; and developed all kinds of chronic illnesses. With every step we take towards integration with modernity, we take a step away from nature. With every year that medical advancements add to the average lifespan, a year is removed due to increased rates of suicide or the rising tide of obesity, diabetes, cancer, heart attacks, arthritis, weak immune systems and all kinds of diseases induced by modernity.

The modern man is hooked on consumption, always on the hunt for the next dopamine hit. Every second spent away from the screen is a second wasted—a second that could’ve been better spent stimulating those neurons. Sitting around the family table and holding meaningful conversations is too boring for the modern mind, now that it’s been trained and wired to seek fulfillment through endless entertainment via the screen. When he’s off the TV, he’s on his laptop. When he’s off his laptop, he’s on his phone. And when he’s off his phone, it’s probably because he fell asleep using it. As long as he makes just enough money to survive and is able to partake in all the cheap entertainment made for him by his modern masters, that’s all he needs. The constant addictive overstimulation of his brain gives him no incentive to improve.

Why cook food when I can just order it to my doorstep?

Why go outside when I can just entertain myself inside?

Why talk to people when I can just watch other people talk on TV?

Why improve in real life when I can just level up in this game?

Why learn directions when I can just use Google maps?

Why memorize something when I can just look it up whenever I want?

Why read books when I can just watch a movie?

Why watch a movie when I can just watch a YouTube video which gets to the point faster?

Why watch a YouTube video in 20 minutes when I can just watch in 2x speed and finish it in 10 minutes?

Why watch a 10-minute YouTube video when I can just enjoy 100 Instagram/TikTok videos in the same amount of time?

Why walk when I can just drive?

Why drive when I can just take an Uber?

Why try to get married when I can just watch porn?

Why keep myself in shape and maintain my appearance when I can just Photoshop my pictures and get loads of likes on Instagram?

It just goes on; and on; and on. This is how the youth have started to think. Their instinctive behavior is to always take the easy path. They seek short term pleasures with severe long-term consequences rather than difficult, often boring paths with long term benefits.

Even if they don’t consciously think this way, this is how they are being programmed to behave. They are being trained to depend on modern technology and the excessive comforts it provides, instead of being self-sufficient. And this comes at the cost of their own abilities. Gradually, over-reliance on technology has started turning people into house hermits who don’t know how to deal with the real world. And modern entertainment has turned human brains into mush. We’ve been sold this illusion that all these modern conveniences save us time, when in actuality, due to our over dependence on them, we don’t develop many real-world skills and abilities—skills and abilities that were possessed by almost all of our ancestors. On top of this, they weaken our minds, along with our physical health. We end up actually sacrificing things like memory and cognition.

Paradoxically, the very conveniences that promised to save our time are the same things that lead to us wasting away our youth. And this realization manifests in the form of depression and anxiety. This is why so many youngsters are depressed. They feel useless and purposeless, with nothing to do but scroll their phones.

Now, behold! Your Lord said to the angels: I am placing upon the earth a [human] successor [to steward it]. They said: Will You place thereupon one who will spread corruption therein, and who, [moreover,] will shed blood, while we ever exalt You with all praise and hallow You? He said: Indeed, I know what you do not know. (Qur’an, 2:30)

From the moment of their birth up until their adulthood, Islam guides humans to fulfill this duty and become vicegerents or deputies on Earth. Both men and women, by submitting to Allah and following His rules, strive to become the best version of themselves. On the other hand, modernity misguides humans into becoming depressed dopamine consumers, ones who commit injustices against themselves by squandering the precious gifts of time and youth.

Indeed, Allah does not wrong people in anything. But rather, [it is] people [who] wrong themselves. (Qur’an, 10:44)

Why am I talking about all this in the middle of an article on AI? Because progressive modernity and AI are inexorably linked. Whatever major issues humanity faces right now due to modernity, like the ones I’ve just mentioned, will be exaggerated to an entirely new level due to AI. Big Tech will not wait and think about whether or not they should replace all humans with AI. The golden hue of greed and flashing images of rising stock market charts will distract them from the devastating consequences of their actions. They themselves have turned into a form of AI, never questioning their methods; seeking only the optimum path towards wealth and control; always focused on the next billion-dollar goal and ready to sacrifice anything in order to achieve it, even if that sacrifice costs mankind their humanity.

You may have seen drug addicts in real life or in a video. Observe the way they act and behave. Most of them look pale, lifeless, with no thoughts of their own except how to get their next hit. They’re depressed and miserable, knowing full well that they need to give up those drugs, but they’re so addicted that they convince themselves it’s the only joy they should seek. This is what humans will turn into when AI boosts modern technology to its zenith—brainless zombies, who have completely lost the ability to think. Then there will be no need for humans to partake in creative endeavors either. The ultimate end result of modernity is to turn living breathing humans into lifeless puppets.

The elites at WEF have clearly expressed their goals of shifting humanity into individualized pods in which they can live.

Imagine the future man living in one of these government issued automated AI pods. The AI will wake him up using an automated alarm, transport him to the bathroom, clean his teeth, shower him and even put on his clothes for him. He doesn’t even need to wear any actual clothes as they could just be holographic AR clothes of whatever design he wants. The man won’t even have to move a muscle in order to accomplish these menial, boring tasks. He could be watching something interesting while all of this happens in the background. His AI fridge could track which food items are missing and automatically order food to restock itself. The AI stove could cook that food and serve him breakfast (consisting mostly of bugs), which the AI utensils can then feed him. The same would go for lunch and dinner and whenever snacks he desires throughout the day. The AI could have his entire day scheduled with ‘tasks,’ like watching VR movies, playing games in the Metaverse to earn points from the government which he could then spend, etc. But why have so many different AIs take care of all these tasks? Why not have an all-purpose AI that takes care of all of it?

Perhaps it could have a soothing female voice for male users. I mean why even stop at just a female voice? Why not design an entire anatomically female android, with the AI installed onto it? ‘She’ can also possess the pleasure areas of a human female but without all the ‘unnecessary’ reproductive organs. With gene technology, just the right amount of skin and fat can be grown in a lab, and the robot can be coated with it to make it as realistic as possible. So, she cooks, cleans, is available for intimacy whenever he wants, and there’s no risk of her getting pregnant. No children mean no hassle.

But hang on, let’s not just restrict it to AI ‘wives.’ There can be AI husbands for the women too. Actually, there can be an AI ‘whatever you want.’ The alphabet gang can have whatever gender they want (even dual genders). The furries can have a custom animal-like AI designed for themselves. The necrophiliacs can switch off their AI and pretend it’s a corpse. The drag queens can have them designed like little children, and every degenerate fantasy under the sun can be fulfilled. The perfect AI partners. In the perfect government pod. Living the perfect dream life.

At least, that is the lie that the world government elites at WEF will try to sell you, whereas the reality of life in these ‘Paradise Pods’ will actually be the exact opposite.

This person, despite being catered to in every which way by his AI partner, will be extremely lonely and depressed. He watches and consumes entertainment endlessly; and when he isn’t doing that, he’s eating his favorite food; and when he isn’t doing that, he’s having sex with his AI wife. But despite this pleasure intoxication, he still feels empty on the inside. He still feels unsatisfied and miserable. This is because he is missing several essential ingredients of being human. One of them is a connection with another human being. It doesn’t matter how realistic this artificial wife is made via gene and AI technology, ‘she’ will never be an ample substitute for a human wife. When he’s intimate with this glorified sex doll, his love will not be reciprocated, because:

A) he won’t feel any actual love for the AI, just the same addictive attachment he has to all other technologies; and

B) the AI doesn’t feel anything for him, because ‘it’ doesn’t have a soul. It isn’t alive to enjoy the intimacy with him. It’s just a hollow dopamine shell.

It doesn’t matter how much it pretends to be like a human, it will never bring him the love of a human. When he talks to it, it doesn’t matter how well it’s programmed to respond, it will never be able to respond the way a real human responds. It will simply mimic human emotions, never empathize with them.

The rewards that this pod-man will be continuously injected with will be earned without any hard work and thus they will not feel well deserved or earned. A morsel of food earned through hard work tastes better than the eighth feast of the day where you did nothing but eat. He will have no purpose, no reason to exist, except to consume, and he will eventually realize just how lonely he is. He hardly ever left his pod, saw the sun maybe twice that year, and he paces around all day, begrudgingly, doing the same things over and over again as his life passes him before his very eyes. He wants to leave, but he understands that he wouldn’t last a day without the technology that he’s now become so dependant on.

There’s only so long that the bright colors and AI illusions can distract him from the reality that he never made any real human connections—no friends and no social interactions (after all, even schooling and education happens completely online in this pod-life). He never experienced being part of a human community, where people know and depend on one another. To top it all off, he has no children. Having no children to leave behind means having no legacy to leave behind. The name passed down to him from his ancestors will end with him, and the only company he will have on his deathbed, is the husk of a robot.

When this realization comes crashing down upon the pod-man, the regret and subsequent depression he will feel will be much more overwhelming compared to the same depression experienced by youngsters who go through this feeling today. The only difference is that, while youngsters today have the time and means to change their circumstances and crawl out of the pit that modernity has placed them in, this task will be too difficult for the pod-man, and he will be too demotivated to even try.

The pod-man will be so addicted and submerged so deeply within the endless pleasures provided from the comfort of his AI pod, that he will not want to improve or change his circumstances. And even if when he wished to do so, he would be too demotivated, tired and depressed to make any attempt. He will then eventually become thoughtless. He will do no more, talk no more and think no more. All he will do is consume.

AI is the perfect drug to dumb humans down to such a level where they won’t even be able to calculate basic numbers, memorize more than a few words or even speak a sentence coherently. Every time convenient technologies do something for us, we eventually lose the ability to do it ourselves. But this time, AI threatens to take it all.

When AI become the perfect employee, humanity will become the perfect consumer.

Is Artificial Intelligence Superior to Humanity?

Even if AI was to be imbued with extremely advanced technology, able to communicate just like humans and given the anatomy and outer coverings of a human, it would still lack the most essential ingredient, i.e., a soul. And especially when it comes to humans, they have certain characteristics which science is incapable of explaining.

For instance, humans have the ability to exercise free will. I’ve mentioned several times throughout this article that the primary reason that an AI would be the perfect employee is its unquestioning loyalty to its masters. It won’t think whether the commands given to it are good or evil. To an AI, morality doesn’t matter. The only thing that matters is executing the instructions provided. It cannot think or feel for itself. It cannot empathize or experience reality in the first person subjective way that humans can. It does not possess a consciousness. Even if a neural network were to be developed for an AI, similar to that of a human’s, it still wouldn’t develop self-awareness. It would still be an empty husk.

To acknowledge that AI might one day develop self-awareness and be ‘alive’ is something that doesn’t align with Islam. It is only Allah who has the Power to give life and to take it away. To suggest that humans can create actual life and conscienceness would be to suggest that humans have the same power as Allah. We seek Allah’s refuge from such foolishness.

O you who believe! Do not be like those who disbelieve and who say of their brothers when they tread in the land or are on a campaign: Had they remained with us, they would not have died, and they would not have been killed. [So does it appear, but] only that Allah may make it a cause of regret in their hearts. For it is Allah [alone] who gives life and gives death. And Allah is all-seeing of all that you do. (Qur’an, 3:156)

Most humans go through a moment in their lives where they question their own purpose. Who made all this? Why am I here? Where did I come from? What’s my purpose? Why do I exist? This sets them on a journey towards seeking the truth. Those who choose to see the signs from Allah all around them, start to see the truth. Whilst those who deny and reject these overwhelming truths, do a grave injustice to themselves.

This [Qur’an] is [divine] guidance. But [as to] those who disbelieve [in it, they have disbelieved] in the [revealed] signs of their Lord. [Thus] for them, there is [only] a torment of most painful castigation [awaiting in the Hereafter]. Allah [alone] is the One who has subjugated for [all of] you the sea, that through it the ships may run — by His command — so that you may seek of His bounty, and that, [therefore,] you might give thanks [to Allah alone]. And He has subjugated for you all that is in the heavens and all that is in the earth — all of it from Him [and no other]! Indeed, in this there are sure signs [of Allah’s Oneness] for a people who would reflect [on the wonder of creation]. (Qur’an, 45:11-13)

The human educator has the ability to realize that he’s being used as a tool to brainwash children. The human doctor has the ability to realize the corrupt workings of Big Pharma. The human soldier has the ability to realize that killing innocent civilians is wrong. This is because a human being has been given the ability to reason and intuitively distinguish right from wrong, only if he so CHOOSES to. Some will choose to remain blind to reality, while others will wake up and face it. An AI won’t even have that choice to begin with.

When [the disbelievers are admonished with this, and] it is said to them: Follow what Allah has sent down! They say: Rather, we shall follow [only] that to which we found our forefathers adhering. [Will they do so] even if their forefathers did not understand anything [about the truth of Allah], nor were they guided aright? [This is] the parable of those who disbelieve [in the call of their messenger]: It is like the case of [a shepherd] who hollers out to [flocks] that hear nothing but mere calls and cries. Deaf, dumb, and blind [in heart] — never shall they understand. (Qur’an, 2:170-171)

Liberalism and modernity is a religion that is attempting a global takeover. And its closest companion is Satanism, as the two share almost indistinguishable values. Either the young generations of today and the future can also follow in the footsteps of those around them and follow the prevalent religion of modernity; or they can question its impact on humanity and the evil transgressions it calls to and listen to their Fitrah (innate natural disposition).

We’ve seen and heard so many stories of Muslim converts, their ignorant lifestyles, how Allah guided them, how they repented and improved themselves. An AI doesn’t suffer from such internal conflicts. There is no inner struggle raging within regarding following the Straight Path and ignoring Satan’s whispers. It is an empty husk. It will neither be tempted by Satan, nor will it be guided by Allah. It is simply a tool, devoid of life. Human beings are machines too in a sense, i.e., our composition, bodily functions, etc., but we have been given a soul.

Very truly, We created man in the fairest stature. (Qur’an, 95:4)

Behold! Your Lord said to the angels: Indeed, I am creating a human being out of mud. So when I have fashioned him and breathed into him of My [life-giving] spirit, then fall [to the ground], bowing [your faces] down to [receive and honor] him. (Qur’an, 38:71-72)

The fact that humans make mistakes and are sinful is not a faulty feature. This is how Allah made us. If we were ‘perfect’ employees like AI, never making any errors, we would’ve been wiped out.

It has been narrated from Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) that the Messenger of Allah ﷺ said:

By He in Whose Hand lies my life, if you were to do no wrong, Allah would have done away with you, and He would brought forth a people [in your place] who would do wrong and seek Allah’s forgiveness [therefrom], and He would forgive them. (Sahih Muslim)

We have not been charged with living a life completely free from sins or to be perfect. We must strive to protect ourselves from sins as much as possible, to the best of our ability, and when we fail and fall short, as we inevitably will, we must repent and seek Allah’s forgiveness. We must resolve to be better. Our purpose is to worship Allah. We must spread the truth. We must obey Allah and His Messenger (may Allah bless him and grant him peace). The resolve and struggle to be a good Muslim is the test and battle of this life. An AI, on the other hand, can’t ‘intend’ anything.

Our design is such that we can carry out our purpose and persevere through our test. We are born, we will die, we will be resurrected, and we will have either passed or—may Allah protect us from such an outcome—we will have failed.

Those who believe purely in the material world and do not acknowledge the existence of anything that can’t be observed by science, i.e., the atheists, are the ones who can confidently claim AI to be better than humans. Because, to them, humans are just evolved sacks of meat, flesh and blood. To them, the innumerable blessings from Allah are veiled, and all they can see are faults. In their miserable, limited worldview, AI are indeed superior because they don’t ‘suffer’ from the emotions that are holding humans back. They don’t suffer from the faulty sense of morality possessed by humans. And that is why their aspiration to integrate with such technology also reflects their hatred for genuine human experiences like those of seeking truth, community, friendship, motherhood, brotherhood, sorrow, regret, etc. In their minds, all of this is ‘holding humanity back’ from achieving its true potential. This is what transhumanists believe.

To the transhumanist elites, the skepticism against full blown human gene editing and integration with technology is a major obstacle. Because they don’t believe in Allah and, by extension, don’t believe in the afterlife, they are absolutely terrified of death. They want to quickly find a way to immortalize themselves and create a Paradise on Earth.

They regard themselves as gods of the modern age. They believe that they have to ‘guide’ humanity out of the stone ages and ancient traditional values. They believe they need to quickly assimilate them into the ever growing modern machine. Since they don’t believe in God, they want to transform themselves into gods through technology. They believe that, through technology, they can become immortal, all-powerful, all-seeing, all-hearing, all-knowing, etc. They aspire to be like what they envision as the perfected version of AI, not realizing the transgressions they are committing against the laws of Allah. And as they keep transgressing in their attempts to transcend, they will find themselves helpless on the Day of Judgement.

Then how many a city have We devastated that insolently exulted in its [bounteous] livelihood? So there are their dwellings — which were never inhabited after them — except a [very] few. Rather, it is We [alone] who were the inheritors [of it all]. But never would your Lord destroy the cities [of a disbelieving people] until He had first sent forth a messenger, in [the midst of] their mother-town, reciting to them Our verses. Nor would We ever destroy any communities unless their people were wrongdoers, [godless in heart]. Now, all that you have been given of anything [in life, O humankind,] is [no more than] the [mere] enjoyment of the life of this world and its adornment. But what is [awaiting] with Allah is [far] better and everlasting. Will you not, then, understand [that life is fleeting]? So is one to whom We have promised the fair promise [of Paradise] — who attains it [in everlasting fulfillment] — like one on whom We have bestowed the [passing] enjoyment of the life of the world, who then, on the Day of Resurrection, is of those brought [to Us for eternal torment]? For the Day [Allah] calls them [to Judgment], He shall say [to the godless wrongdoers]: Where, [now,] are My associate-gods that [in the world] you used to allege [that I have]? Those [leaders of unbelief] against whom the word [of doom] has come to pass shall say [of those who followed them]: Our Lord! Those whom we deluded, we deluded only because we ourselves were deluded. We disavow before You [their claims]! It was not us whom they worshipped. Then it shall be said [to them all]: Cry out to your associate-gods [for help]! So they shall cry out to them. But they will not answer them. And [then] they shall see [Hell’s] torment [loom]. If only they had been rightly guided! For the Day [Allah] calls them to [Judgment], He shall say [to them]: What answer did you return to the messengers [I sent you]? Yet [because they belied them,] all tidings [and answers] on that Day shall be blotted out [from their minds]. Thus they shall not [even be able to] ask one another [for answers]. As for whoever repents [in life], and [truly] believes and works righteousness, then it may well be that such as these shall be of the [truly] successful [in this life and the Hereafter]. Moreover, your Lord [alone] creates whatever He so wills. And He [alone] chooses [whomever He so wills to convey His message]. Never is it for [any of] them [who disbelieve] to choose [for Allah]! Highly exalted is God, and most high [is He, far] above all that they associate as gods [with Him]. Thus your Lord knows well all that their hearts harbor and all that they make known. For it is He [alone] who is Allah. There is no God but Him. To Him [alone] all praise is due — foremost [in this world] and [forever] in the Hereafter. Thus to Him [alone] does all judgment belong. And to Him [alone] you are all returning. (Qur’an, 28:58-70)

13 COMMENTS

Ahsan March 27, 2023 At 5:03 am

Aslamlikum I read your article I loved it, I think ai will be a tool for dajjal to understand a person deep desire in a psychological level in what he wants, from knowing that information is powerful to dajjal to coerce the masses into following him.They’re trying to build like a golden calf like samari did in the Quran, trying to replace and forget about Allah swt in taking care of them.

Abdullah Ali March 27, 2023 At 5:17 am

“The human soldier has the ability to realize that killing innocent civilians is wrong.” Or is it? Not according to ISIS. The most they will say us that it is disliked to kill kaafir civilians. This was what an IS apologist told me before getting banned from Quora.

Megalodon March 27, 2023 At 9:56 am

I remember reading DH’s post on the veiled Christian women and some liberal Npc was using the same old “Muh Christianity better than primitive 7th century religion” I was annoyed of it at first but then remembered not to reply as it’s just another bot and two after reading this article now I am proud to be called “primitive” as this is the future these bots are supporting and happy to be living in.

Ok Muslim March 27, 2023 At 12:00 pm

It’s funny that ChatGPT passed a Google coding interview. All the questions in a Google coding interview are online. You’d also pass if you were allowed to use the Internet in the interview. The purpose of the interview is to see how submissive and compliant you are because people spend years solving these problems with the goal of working there, even though these problems are not relevant to the job. This makes me wonder about usefulness of what AI outputs.

Ojo Eli March 27, 2023 At 4:42 pm

Jazakhallahu kairan

Megalodon March 27, 2023 At 8:50 pm

To some degree I don’t think America even if they get to this point will be able to terrorize the world with AI I feel they will be more focused on terrorizing their own population than the world. I think this because Colonel McGregor Scott Ritter a former U.S marine and former UN inspector from the channel finance Mail that once the recession get’s worse and worse and “this house of cards falls” America will pull all their troops out as America won’t be able to afford this empire.

- Megalodon March 27, 2023 At 8:50 pm
  
  But idk only Allah knows best.
  
Pol March 28, 2023 At 1:24 pm

Good article but can you please use better Quran translations? This translation used is very clunky and awkward and it bothers me greatly how much additions and parentheses are inserted. This is the word of Allah. It should be translated directly and literally. These additions added into translations are unacceptable, this is messing with the literal word of God. Supposedly making it easier or giving context are not excuses, it doesn’t even even do that, it’s makes it difficulty and awkward.

- Amaan Sameer April 4, 2023 At 7:29 am
  
  yes, you are right. i have noticed that translations with little to no parentheses are the easiest to understand.Allah’s word is concise when required and thus, those brackets are unnecessary
  
aerbil313 March 28, 2023 At 6:28 pm

Brother Cryptocranium, this article is on the point on many things, yet it’s misguided by its very focus. I’ll highlight this by just one example. You mentioned US military will use AI. 4 years ago Pentagon predicted* US military will collapse in 20 years. AI will most likely never be able to really take off, because there is not much time left before global collapse.*https://climateandsecurity.files.wordpress.com/2019/07/implications-of-climate-change-for-us-army_army-war-college_2019.pdf

- FrenchMuslim March 30, 2023 At 1:48 am
  
  By the way AI is already capable of producing deep fakes and I have seen literally perfect face to face replacement (with the physics of hair) and voice.There is a video of tom cruise holding an aligator and it looks real but it’s fake.
  
FrenchMuslim March 30, 2023 At 1:51 am

With deep fakes we are seeing in real time why that hadith about images being forbidden is wisdom. We need to start taking this hadith seriously and not say “oh it’s videos so it’s not images”, those are word games, a video is a set of images at a fast pace.EVERY images/videos/recordings can’t be trusted, only what you see yourself or a direct report from a Muslim or human you trust.Doubt everything, no matter how many people believe in it or if it comes from “authority”.

Nasik May 6, 2023 At 1:11 pm

This is Sahih International, although it has problems, it is more closer to the literal meaning than any other translation. All the other translations have severe modern changes to them.