It has been pretty clear for the past two months how Madkhalis have worked hard to support Israel and defame the Palestinian resistance. If you have been following me on Twitter, you would see that I have posted dozens of examples.
What is shocking is that even Zionists have acknowledged that Madkhalis are their allies.
The most prominent example of this was published recently by the Times of Israel.
Why are Major Israeli Newspapers Attacking Me, While Explicitly Endorsing Madkhali Muslims as “Allies of Israel” who Support Palestinian Genocide?
At present, the Israeli, UAE, and Saudi governments are allied through a variety of agreements, including the emerging Abraham accords.
All three governments strongly oppose “Islamists.” Islamists are simply Muslims who favor increased commitment to Islam in society and (perhaps) government. At the same time, there are many types of Islamists. They differ in their level of conservatism. Sometimes there are also conflicts between them due to sectarian affiliation (Sunni versus Shii). Examples of Islamist organizations/institutions include Turkey’s ruling AK Party, the Qatari monarchy, Palestine’s Hamas, Saudi Arabia’s Sahwa movement, Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood, Tunisia’s Nahda, Iran’s Islamic republic, and Lebanon’s Hezbollah.
Islamists believe that increased commitment to Islam means following religious teachings which require that Muslims across the world help one another and defend one another. Hence Islamists favor more international Muslim solidarity and mutual aid (e.g., for Kashmiris, Rohingya, Uighurs). In particular, Islamists favor more aid for Palestine against Israel.
Meanwhile, political groups who oppose Islamists usually favor secular liberal values. Hence, they want less Islam in government and society. These groups also favor ethnic and territorial nationalism rather than international Muslim solidarity. Hence, they want to decrease international Muslim aid for Palestine against Israel.
Generally speaking, Israel has opposed Islamism since its founding seventy years ago. Saudi and UAE have long had Islamist tendencies. Nevertheless, matters have changed since the Arab Spring a decade ago. Now both the Saudi and UAE governments strongly oppose Islamism.
During the past decade, Israel has made an alliance with Saudi and UAE to build a new Middle East, where there is no Islamism and no Palestine.
Netanyahu has indicated this in a recent UN speech, where he speaks about a New Middle East – one based on good relations between Israel, Saudi Arabia, and UAE – and where Palestine no longer exists.
Similar ideas are reflected in an interview with prominent UAE ambassador.
The UAE and Saudi governments have developed a network of religious scholars who endorse their policies of fighting Islamism, promoting secular liberal values, allying with Israel, and destroying Palestine.
Some of these government-backed religious scholars identify as Sufi traditionalists or modernists (e.g., Abdullah bin Bayyah, Muhammad al-Issa, Hamza Yusuf).
However, the largest group of government-backed religious scholars may be categorized as “Madkhalis.”
Madkhali Zionism
Madkhalis are a new religious sect that were created by the Saudi government in the 1990s. They pretend to be Salafis but adopt views radically opposed to those of genuine Salafis.
Madkhalis teach that Islam’s core principle is silent acceptance of whatever the ruling government does. On this view, verbal criticism of government policies is never allowed, and anyone who engages in such criticism deserves imprisonment or death. Indeed, mere verbal criticism is equated with terrorism. In particular, Madkhalis claim that Muslims must silently accept government policies which remove religion from state and society and government policies which involve cooperation with Israel to destroy Palestine and genocide the Palestinian people.
RELATED: [WATCH] Saajid Lipham and the Madkhali Virus
The major Israeli Newspaper “Times of Israel” has just published an article urging all Israelis to support Madkhalis and help their movement grow. Moreover, the article has identified the British religious preacher Shamsi as a “senior Islamic scholar” and key Madkhali leader. Shamsi is closely linked to two other Madkhali religious authorities. He is a student of Abu Khadeejah and an associate of Faris al-Hammadi.
It has been established that Abu Khadeejah is an agent of the Saudi Arabian government (who is secretly paid through “work” for Saudi-owned companies). Meanwhile, Faris Hammadi openly admits to being a paid employee of the UAE government.
Why Are Madkhalis Friends of Israel?
The article in the Times of Israel emphasizes that Madkhalis are good for two reasons.
First, they help governments repress Islamists and spread secular liberal values in Muslim lands. Second, they help governments ally with Israel and aid Israel in its genocide of the Palestinians. This is not an exaggeration. The article literally asserts that Madkhalis support the forceful removal of all Palestinians from their lands.
The article further identifies me as a leading Islamist who opposes Shamsi and other Madkhalis. It also emphasizes that I am an enemy of secular liberal values, Israel, and Palestinian genocide.
At the same time, the article makes some significant errors. It mistakenly asserts that Sh Al-Albani was a Madkhali. This is sometimes claimed by Madkhalis, but it is false. Sh Al-Albani taught that it was permissible to openly criticize governments for policies which violate Islam. On these grounds he openly criticized the Saudi Arabian government for cooperating with the US and Israel in the bombing of Iraq and occupation of Palestine. He also criticized the government for allowing the US to build military bases on Saudi soil.
Watch the following clips of Sh Al-Albani making these points:
Shaykh al Muhaddith Al Albani (رحمه الله) vehemently criticizing the Saudi government in three separate clips.
While the Shaykh was extremely reserved in making takfir, he was no coward. All the kufr done by the Iraqi Baathists was no different than most modern Muslim states. pic.twitter.com/FMnphrt89k
— abul ma’ali (@abulmaali_) August 12, 2021
The article also falsely claims that I am an Iranian Shia. Although my parents are Iranian Shia immigrants to the US, I am not Shia, as I have made clear many times. Finally the article claims that I am a “jihadist,” which is false insofar as this label customarily implies support for terrorism (e.g., Qaeda, ISIS) which I have explicitly and repeatedly rejected.
RELATED: [WATCH] The Unapologetic Truth about Islamic Jihad and Terrorism
That being said, here are some key quotes from the article:
As antisemitism increases across the world, even in Western nations particularly amongst the far-right and white-supremacist organizations – it is still important to note that support for the State of Israel does exist in an unlikely place and can be even expanded with the right approach and support. As military historians in the Middle East probably would have guessed, I am referring to an obscure Islamic sect that is a much stronger supporter for normalization of ties with Israel – than even secular, nationalist and liberal political parties – the school of thought known as Madkhalism. As far as any expert knows, the threat from terrorism is rooted fundamentally and inextricably in political Islam [i.e., Islamism] … However, the sect of Madkhalism is core counterbalance to these groups, and helps secure Western secular democratic interests and ideals, as well as the security of the State of Israel.
Additionally, this sect believes in the permissibility of normalizing ties between Islamic governments and Israel and does not believe in boycotting Israeli goods and services. Their unquestioning obedience to governments, even those that are clearly pro-Israeli, such as the UAE, Jordan, Egypt, Morocco, and Sudan etc. means that official policies that benefit Israel will not be opposed but supported, since in their words this is the “decision for the rulers.” Moreover, this theological principle, known in Arabic as ta’at wali al amr which can be translated as “obedience to the ruler,” is the bedrock of stability across the pro-Israeli Middle Eastern states.
To further simply the distinction between Madkhalism and the Jihadist terrorists, in the UK, Shamsi Bensafi, an Islamic cleric, has advocated for peace with the Jewish State of Israel, whilst Daniel Haqiqatjou – an Iranian Shia Jihadist-oriented political agitator – has advocated for endless war with Jews as a whole so that Palestinians can have a state from the river to the sea. The former is a proponent of Madkhalism whilst the latter is a proponent of Jihadist political Islam; and the former is friend of Israel, whilst the latter is an enemy of Israel. Which one benefits Western and Israeli interests?
In the final analysis, when we objectively review all the evidence, it becomes firmly established that Madkhalism is the strain of Islamic thought that is most friendly to the tactical, operational, and strategic goals and objectives of the State of Israel. This group has no problems with normalizing ties with the State of Israel, nor it has any problems with Arab states buying and selling with Israel, thereby strengthening Israeli economy, and securing its interests across the Islamic world and even beyond. Shockingly, it openly promotes the idea of removing all Palestinians from the West Bank and Gaza, and they legitimize the authority and power of modern State of Israel over all the territories that are considered Palestinian territory by the politically problematic strain of the Muslim Brotherhood-type organizations.”
Now, obviously what Zionists say about Muslims is not worth spit, but they are clearly not making stuff up. They are pointing to the clear stance of Madkhalis on Israel, a stance which Madkhalis themselves have advertised non-stop since Oct 7. The article is only affirming what everyone already knows:
Madkhalis are the friends of Israel, and they are enemies of the Ummah.
NOTE: If the article is taken down, here it is in full:
oh wow
Could this have been done to create a larger schism between Muslims? A two bit like shamsi doesn’t deserve this attention.
Straight from the horse’s mouth
Indeed
The writer of that opinion piece is Zalghi. When you type in Zalghi or Zolghi in Google you’re directed almost exclusively to Iranian sites i.e. it’s a rare name, but you’ll pretty much will find it only in Iran. The writer is Iranian. He claims to be Texan. And he’s around the age of 40. This means he has at least three major data points in common with Daniel.
On Facebook there’s a video of him dated 2011. It has no audio. But when you download it audio is retrieved. When the video playes you can hear Persian in the background (mostly likely tv or radio).
It’s a newscast with a man and woman. The subject is Afghanistan.
Huge amount of inconsistencies. He claims to work for Royal Dutch Shell and to be an – former – investment banker. Shell doesn’t employ investment bankers. It hires third parties specialized in that work to do the job. On the blog of IT he claims to be in training to be an accountant i.e. still learning. On Quora he claims to be a chartered accountant.
Also, when I image search his picture he has on Quora it points to Russia. Most likely St. Petersburg. If not definitely somewhere in North or East Europe.
The boat in the background is possibly a Hydrofoil touring boat.
Some of his books in the image that is on IT are in Cyrillic script i.e. Russian.
The guy most likely resides in Russia not Dallas, Texas like he claims.
His English verbal ability is quite poor. His English articles seem to be at least partially plagiarized. The “Madkhalism” article seems to heavily borrow from Daniel’s writings. But its not only with that article. Zalghi does it repeatedly. Compare for instance Daniel’s articles against Perves Hoodbhoy and compare it to Zalghi’s articles against Hoodbhoy on the Dunya blog.
“it’s a rare name”
Funny. After some research. Zalghi (Persian زلقی) in Pahlavi language literally means ‘rare’ or ‘precious’. It’s one of the larger Bakhtiari clans.
It’s also interesting to see who’s running with the opinion piece. And an opinion of a majhool person at that i.e. basically anonynous. Nobody knows who he really is. Asrar Rashid the Brailwi Super Sufi, Jonathan Brown the uber-progressive et al…in other words ahlul bidah wa ad-dalaal. Breaking every rule on the way: verify the news, don’t spread rumors, don’t do dolm against another person especially if he’s Muslim etc.
More like shaitan’s mouth.
Horses are beautiful creatures of Allah, peaceful and friendly.
The zionists are followers of shaitan.
So in essence Madkhalis are the bootlickers of Gulf’s Gutter Regimes. Means that they will even do apostasy if their beloved rulers says so. Regarding, Times of Israel calling Shamsi as “religious scholar” and Bro Daniel as “Iranian Shia”, one can imagine how committed they are to Goebbels doctrine of “spreading lies and deception”.
I still laugh that they claimed that Daniel was a Shia when A he and the Muslim skeptic team has made tons of articles condemning and denouncing Iranian Shiism and the Iranian government and Assad and Putin . And B he is an ex Shia and he revealed that when he was interviewed by the Sunnah discourse team two years ago and he gave his backstory of how he became Sunni alhumdilah .If they said he was a Sunni than that would be correct but they did he was Shia lmao and got that wrong .
I don’t believe so, but recent behaviour honestly has me doubting. The obsessive focus on Gulf governments…particularly Daniel’s anti-Saudism. His radio silence on the Iranian regime. His promotion of revolts in Arab lands etc. Basically all his stances in this matter support the Iranian regime’s agenda in the region. It’s typical of Shia zealots. Just because there is agreement obviously doesn’t mean sameness. But it’s worrying at the very least.
You are a shameless khaleeji lapdog. Firstly, if you have balls, say openly that your manhaj is support of khaleeji rulers no matter what! It’s irrelevant to you if you support their supported version of salafism (madkhalism) or sufism (Ali Jifry, Bin Bayyah et al).
Secondly, only a shameless hypocrite like you will say refuting shiaism but not criticizing Iran a few dozen times a week is supposedly support of the rawafid. Apply that same standard on your blind taqlid of the GCC.
Thirdly for what it’s worth for on ground matters, while the rulers of the entire ummah are guilty of inaction, the khaleejis are exceptionally cooperative with the yahood & the colonial powers. That is precisely the reason these most perfect lapdogs of colonialism (along with Egypt & Jordan) are criticized by any sensible Muslim more than rafidi Iran or Sunni Bangladesh is criticized!
My manhaj is simple. Obeying the wali ul-amr is from the deen because Allah has commanded it in his Kitab, and his Rasul in his Sunnah. As a Muslim you’re obligated to do this as long as there is no disobedience to Allah and his Rasul.
The Majoosi Rawafid rulers are kuffaar who pose a direct threat to Islam and the Muslims. They, in recent years, have already killed many hundreds of thousands of Ahle Sunnah and made millions refugees. Equating the two makes no sense whatsoever.
Tu ne vaux rien. Retourne lécher les couvres-chefs à damier blancs et rouges de ces chefs d’États que tu idolâtres.
Translation pease
*please
You’re worthless. Go back and lick the white and red checkered hats of those Arab rulers you worship.
I speak french better by far and as I guessed he is also from France, so I wanted to hit him with some french catchphrase. I used to hate madhkhalist before Gaza genocide ; now I hate them even more.
Thx and dam
You are either a liar or drank too much madkhali cool and he has repeatedly said he advocated no rebellion and no violence plus the gulf countries deserve the criticism when they aren’t doing anything about Palestine and are giving funding to Israel in fact MBS approved for giving 2 billion dollars to Jared kushner the Zionist son in law of trump who than gave it to Israel and this was in May 2022 plus
Plus Saudi is the one reviving idol worship having sluts bringing Kuffar in the land of Tawheed brining jucie back in Medina promote shirk and polytheism and having Saudi Halloween and now just recently Saudi Christmas so of course they deserve the criticism as they are the land of Tawheed and Guardians of the Mecca and Medina and the fact the royal family’s net worth is 300 billion to 1.4 trillion dollars and they aren’t giving any aid to the Palestinians earns them criticism
I didn’t even mention how they are promoting feminism and allowing women to work and increasing teh age of consent
Hmmm, perhaps you are one of those people who work in Saudi bot farms who promote those arab zionist’s government agendas
By that mode. The writer of the opinion piece is highly suspect. Seems like an internet troll. On Jewish sites he presents himself as Jewish/Zionist. On other sites he likes to create the illusion he’s a Pakistani Muslim.
What I do know is that the guy is most likely Iranian and claims to reside in Texas. Zalghi or Zolghi is an Iranian name. He also has a very old video on FB, dated 2011. When you download it you can clearly hear the Persian accent.
When America invaded Afghanistan saudi uae was quiet also ,,, so they are …….. According to your argument ??
“I still laugh that they claimed that Daniel was a Shia…”
The Zionist article says he is. So it must be true.
They provided no evidence plus it doesn’t make sense since daniel has criticized and spoken out against the Shia and Iran and Assad and Russia and China . He doesn’t preach sharia garbage meanwhile there is a lot of proof of madkhalis existing and sham is promoting the Abraham accords and justifying normalization with Israel .
*shia
It’s not about the “narrative”
You peanut Brain there’s bro evidence of Daniel being a Shia but there’s tons of evidence of shamsi being a Zionist I literally mentioned them his justification for normalization with Israel his mocking of the Palestinians and the boycotts his constant criticism of Hamas who are the rulers of Gaza and yet his labeling of people who criticize Saudi and uae khariji
Plus you’re the same one who would accept academic and western sources when they show !$!$ was fined and created by America and Israel but when the same ones shows that Saudi and Qatar and Kuwait and turkey and Maylysia also did that you ignore it so if anything it’s you with the confirmation bias ya khairji bootlicker
It is difficult times like these that right colors appear and the vision becomes clearer. My allah have mercy on our brothers and sisters in Palestine.
Getting posted as an ally by The Times Of Israel… Shamsi couldn’t have asked for worse
May Allah protect Daniel and his family and the entire MS team.
“Why are Major Israeli Newspapers Attacking Me, While Explicitly Endorsing Madkhali Muslims as “Allies of Israel” who Support Palestinian Genocide?”
Important question. Which should be thought about well. Israelis are masters at reverse psychology. They know that by painting one incorrectly as allies will discredit that person/group. While the opposite is also true. Painting one as adversary increases their status.
Nice conspiracy theory. You do realize that satan’s tools do have publications like the ‘Times of israel’ and ‘Tablet Mag’ which they publish for their own consumption, right? Obviously, it makes sense for good people to monitor these disgusting rags.
O believers, if an evildoer brings you any news, verify ˹it˺ so you do not harm people unknowingly, becoming regretful for what you have done.
Quran 49:6
We have we verified the evidence for madkhalis and their claims against shamsi and Daniel they were right about shamsi but wrong and incorrect about Daniel .
Who is ‘we’?
Which evidence?
Right about what specifically?
Wrong and incorrect about what specifically?
Substantiate what you’re saying. You and many like you on this site have a very bad habit of speaking in vagueries. ‘we’, ‘they’, ‘the evidence’ etc.
Who, what, where, when, why, how are good questions you should ask yourself before touching off.
I am talking about myself and many other Muslims we have read the evidence and substantiated them and I was talking aboriginals he academics sources Daniel gave to prove the existence of madkahlis and the authentic Hadiths and the Quran and the salafi scholars refuting you bootlickers
Human beings, zionist.
The original article what published 2 days ago. Daniel’s reaction is unusually quick. Normally a reaction to “current” events takes many days, weeks, if not more. This shows extreme eagerness…and happiness because the article assists Daniel’s fight against “Madkhalis”.
The article claims that Shamsi is a “senior Islamic scholar”. Nobody has ever claimed this, including Shamsi. As far as I know there are no senior scholars in the UK…or the US.
In all honesty, the IT article could have been writen by Daniel himself. In fact the article seems to be heavily inspired by Daniel’s writings here on MS.
Many of the same terminologies are there: “sect” “normalizing” etc.
I don’t expect you to show common sense, but for others benefit, not every thing in the world is a well crafted conspiracy, neither is everything so completely random and unconnected either. Lol, you sure you’re not a proponent of reverse psychology yourself?!
Ofcourse that’s possible. But you can’t deny that that article serves Daniel extremely well. Much more than it (dis)serves the so-called “Madkhalis”.This is why he’s very eager to spread and promote it. That IT article could have easily been a Muslimskeptic article written by Daniel because of the uncanny similarities in style and thought. Reviewing the writting I’im pretty sure that the writer is familiar with this site, and a frequent reader.
Du.u.u.uh! It’s a publicly known anti west website. Of course the author could be a regular here. Maybe it’s you! :)
Muslimskeptic doesn’t have millions of visitors. Only a few hundred thousand. It’s a decently visited site. But not to the extent to being widely known. Interestingly since his anti-Saudi/Madkhali posts have ramped up this site has been losing in almost all countries. Last month India was down nearly 30% the US almost 25%. Saudia Arabia has seen a huge increase. With more than 350%
I’m curious as to how you’re privy to those stats?!
Google (Analytics). Also plenty of sites that will give you stats…just put in the url.
For good reason as they have remained silent on Gaza and are making the Shias look like hero’s and they are the rulers of the “land of Tawheed”
Some have and y’all treat him like scholar
“The UAE and Saudi governments have developed a network of religious scholars who endorse their policies of fighting Islamism, promoting secular liberal values, allying with Israel, and destroying Palestine.”
Who are these scholars?
“However, the largest group of government-backed religious scholars may be categorized as “Madkhalis.””
Okay. So, these “scholars” aren’t exclusively “Madkhalis”. Who are the Madkhali ones?
Why do you go out of your way in defending gulf countries that violate the command of Allah? Why are you defending the criminal?
Stop defending the criminal, because then that makes you one. Don’t defend the tyrant oppressor because that makes you an oppressor.
I’m not defending anyone. I’m sticking to the Quran and Sunnah. Which prescribe how we should deal with the ruler…and how we should act in times of fitan. Demonstrations, instigating revolts, revolutions, cursing and mocking the ruler etc. aren’t from the deen.
The Quran and Sunnah contain exactly how we should act…our emotions shouldn’t override this.
Literacy you are going against The rulers by defending teh tawagheet
You are hidden Zionist!
Jew.
The Gulf rulers aren’t tyrants. They are Muslims. They aren’t ma3soom. Only the prophets were.They are simple humans with strenghts and weaknesses. May Allah bless them, make them firm on the deen and help them in overcoming their weaknesses.
The Sunni way is to make dua for our leaders not against them. Because when they rectify it benefits the whole ummah and when they corrupt it damages the whole ummah. Making dua against them is like drilling holes in a boat you yourself are on.
Nope according to the salafi scholars like albani and ibn uthaymeen rh anyone who replaces the shariah of Allah with man made laws are Kuffar and are among the Tawagheet.
For ibn uthaymeen, ibn Baz, albani etc they certainly stipulated those rules when they were serving their masters in Yamama palace instigating uprisings in other nations. Different rules apply when talking about the Khaleeji rulers.
Lets assume you’ve correctly understood this. Which leaders are Muslim and which ones are tawagheet today?
Is Erdogan a Muslim?
Is Anwar Ibrahim of Malaysia Muslim?
Abdelmajid Tebboun of Algeria, Muslim or not?
Or are all current leaders kuffar?
I’ve said it elsewhere on this site. Holding rulers accountable and strongly cross questioning them is not khuruj. It’s proven from seerahs of Khulafa Ar-Rashideen. Just an FYI for people like you.
Of course in democracy too, people have the right to cross question the government… ideally.
Yes, by those who have authority to do so. Not by every Tom, Dick and Harry. The Ulama speak to the rulers behind closed doors. What Daniel is calling to is 100% khuruj. And many of the posters here do the exact same. In the end it doesn’t serve Islam and the Muslims. It serves the Rawafid and the kuffar.
Many people in this internet dawah scene lack emotional controle. You see this with Ali anti-Dawah, Muhammad Hijab and Daniel Haqiqatjou.
This is also why DH called “Madkhalis” so-called Muslims in his video “History: How Israel Sabotaged the Islamic Caliphate”. Basically doing takfir.
When you ask who specifically these co-opted “Madkhali” scholars are you never get a response.
He also never quotes them directly. Shaykh Rabee’ has many books and audio material – free online. You can easily directly quote him. Despite this, info is always second, third ,or more, source.
“Yes, by those who have authority to do so. ”
“The Ulama speak to the rulers behind closed doors.”
According to which verse or hadith or fiqh principle, did you bring the taqayyud (constraint) of ‘those with authority’ and ‘closed doors’?
Every citizen (ie Muslim) has the full right to cross question the ameer / khalifah etc. especially on matters of maslaha of the ummah and deen.
Your rule is based on jahl and the fragile egos of your khaleeji masters who take cross questioning as a hit on their egos and deem it rebelliousness, otherwise it’s called constructive criticism and being held accountable. Granted, rarely has such leadership been seen since the Khilafatur Rashidah, but the fact remains that accountability and good counsel are totally different from khuruj and rebellion and your khaleeji masters deliberately cause confusion between the two for obvious reasons.
You are a typical madkhali saying criticism of the rulers is khurooj whatever liar
Yes the only ones are probably the Taliban who are at least trying to enforce the shariah but all of them yep are all kuffar including the gulf rulers .
Taliban allows shrines and tombs. Afghanistan is full with them. Shirk is openly practised in Afghanistan. Saudi has zero tolerance for this.
“Saudi has zero tolerance for this.”
Really? With publicly promoting Halloween, Christmas and Valentines Day?
Are you really that dishonest?
Isn’t this criticizing the rulers of Afghansitan and calling for khuruj? Did you know there is Daesh in Afghanistan who attack the government, whom the Afghan government is fighting?
If we apply Madkhali standards to you, you are a khariji.
If one can’t criticize Saudi and UAE for allowing haloween, building Hindu temples and normalizing relations with z***ists, then you can’t criticize Afghanistan like you are doing here.
Isn’t this criticizing the rulers of Afghansitan and calling for khuruj? Did you know there is *S*S in Afghanistan who *tt*ck the government, whom the Afghan government is f*ghting? Aren’t you inciting *S*S to f*ght against the Afghan gov for stating this
If we apply Madkhali standards to you, you are a khariji.
If one can’t criticize Saudi and UAE for allowing haloween, building Hindu temples and normalizing relations with z***ists, then you can’t criticize Afghanistan like you are doing here
those Are for their Shia citizens which is wrong and unfortunate but you have been sleeping under a rock Saudi has Shias in their eastern provinces and allows them to have shrines and tombs and do I have to remind you they made a museum of al lat and al uzza and invited a slut to promote shirk all to have western degenerate atheists to visit their land and you just said most of Afghanistan is full of shirk really last I checked Sunnis are 90-95 %
And you just exposed yourself that it’s khurooj to criticize Saudi and the UAE but taliban no they deserve all the criticism even though they are the rulers of Afghanistan typical hypocritical madkhali
This is ANY jahil madkhali lapdog’s unwritten manhaj –
1. They will criticize all Muslim rulers past and present, be it Fatih Sultan Muhammad or Salahuddin or present day Malaysians or Afghans or Turks.
2. They will actively incite rebellion against Morsi or Libyan or Sudani or any other Muslim leader / regime.
3. But they will not tolerate a single word of truth against the Al-Saud’s and the Al-Nahyan’s, even when those shayatin promote outright idolatry & zina.
Yep
If all of them are kuffar, except Taliban, why only focus on the Gulf leaders. Speak about all leaders, except the Taliban. Or those you manhaj allow silence in certain matters?
those you manhaj = does your manhaj
Taliban are trying to implement the shariah that doesn’t mean they aren’t worthy of criticism they are but your gulf countries are worse
I agree that Taliban does deserve some legitimate criticism I didn’t deny it bozo but I praised them for trying to establish 100% shariah meanwhile Saudi and uae are doing everything they can to liberalize and k explained this already why they deserve more criticism as they are the land of Tawheed and they are the richest Muslim countries and Saudi has Mecca and Medina and many Muslims looks up to them so they have a higher standard because their rulers rules the holy land
Don’t lecture me about it “manhaj” when your manhaj remains silent for the gulf rulers you are in no position I have been consistent in calling out the wrongs of all the so called rulers even wrongs of the Taliban
Things you have said that indicate you are a Madkhali:
You say “so-called “Madkhalis”.”, Madkhalis don’t refer to themselves as Madkhalis
Accuse those who criticize rulers of promoting rebellion, as you said “His promotion of revolts in Arab lands etc.”
Always claims to follow quran and sunnah (note following quran and sunnah is good, but Madkhalis always claim they follow it. It is similar to how shias claim to follow ahlul bayt when they don’t)
So, you are a Madkhali.
Yep
He is not even a Madkhalis Bro, He is a hidden Zionist!
I think, You akh without any doubt are a hidden Zionist.
If you disagree, then don’t visit this website, because you don’t have the brain to understand How to distinguish good and evil.
No madman in a mental asylum has ever confessed to being mad(khali).
these people will probably consider being called ‘freinds of israel’ a compliment, so this article is to warn us? or them