DEBATE Islam vs. Hinduism: Treatment of Women | Haqiqatjou vs. Hindu Apologist
Date:
Newsletter
Popular
Muslim Skeptic and all Muslim Skeptic affiliates are opposed to violence and all illegal activity. Anyone suggesting or promoting violence or illegal activity in the comments will be permanently banned.
© Copy Right 2023 | Muslim Skeptic | All Rights Reserved
If MuslimSkeptic gets banned from ALL social media, we'll need your email to stay in touch. Sign up NOW!
What did Daniel do with the beef afterwards
I got so much 2nd hand embaressment from that dude. The allegations he made against the Prophet ﷺ made 0 sense, him saying hindu scriptures commands the husband to worship the wife (when it clearly did not, and lol, he is trying to make hinduism seem like a simp feminist religion).
And lol, he repeated the z***ist lie that Shani Louk was r*ped.
Though, I would like to see a deeper dive into r*pe rates in India compared to other regions. It might have been like the IP debate with the
faulty data. India has lots of muslims, checking if the areas of India with high % of Muslim population having higher rates of r*pe or not might be a better indicator if religion plays a role in it.
I thought they are making women into God now. That made me laugh.
he also lied about the data of pakistan and the little calculation he did was also a lie..
his sources were wikipedia and google lmao
Another argument against these pajeets, there is an interesting parallel of the Aryan migrations and how Central Asian Muslims from Afghanistan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan took over North India. Basically, Muslim invaders came from the same place as the Aryans and became into a ruling class similar to the Brahmans, you have some Indian muslims from Pashtun tribes that come from such ruling classes.
Considering these pajeets believe in liberal British values, they should also accept the Aryan
migration theories done by the same white man, and accept that according to the logic of their hierarchical religion, they should be ruled by Central Asian Muslims.
In fact, they used to boot lick these Muslim rulers and worship them as their gods.
This is true you aren’t wrong. In fact when the Mongols conquered Central Asia and were genociding the Iranian Muslim population of Central Asia and Iran tons of Iranian and Turkish Muslims and other nomadic people Muslim or non Muslim alike migrated to northern India to escape the Mongols and intermarry with the locals to become Indians themselves .
Here’s a question if the indo ayrans were these tall white Ayran people than how in earth did their descendants lose all those traits in India especially in the north ?
That hindu guy actually tried to teach muslims how to read and interpret hadith, the audacity. He talks in a way as if what he says is in the hadith but all of these biases are the result of how he views Islam. When told that, that guy becomes confused and gives bizzare interpretations. I never cared about hinduism. Also don’t care even now.
At 1:45:17, when the pajeet pasted only the “yaru’ni” word in google translate ,it cracked me up as that guy has zero knowledge about arabic language and doesn’t know how languages are to be learned in general. If “yaru’ni” is to be translated as a single word, it still doesn’t mean “to be terrified” as mistaken by google. Google translation makes several types of mistakes when words are translated in single.DeepL does way better job than major translating AI.Perhaps that indian wasn’t aware-
of those shortcomings of google translation. Since he picked only one word and google translate’s mistake fits his narrative, that unveils his pure bias against Islam and most probably learned this whatsapp group. WhatsApp indian anti-Islam groups are full of these things. Google translation of the last sentence highlighted by pajeet : The Prophet, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, married me, so my mother came to me and took me into the house, and no one took care of me except
-the Messenger of God, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him.” The correct translation : “The Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم) married me and my mother came to me and brought me into the house and only the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم) saw me at noon.” Here she meant that only our beloved messenger (صلى الله عليه وسلم) saw her and nobody was there other than him. I mean why do hindus even debate man?!! They were better off hiding their incompetence in religious debates.
In the whole context the phrase actually means startled or surprised it can also mean terrified but in the context it’s not appropriate as the reaction is of a bride on her nupital night. And terrify is a strong emotion which she of course never exhbited during the whole time she was married with prophet I mean she never said she was against the marriage same with marriage of sofia as Daniel said they can’t differentiate between rape and marriage. It’s the like fighting liberalism.
Yes as Aisha (رضى الله عنها) saw our Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم) alone ,she was surprised as the situation of that moment depicts that scenario. What I translated at last was a lexical translation with no scenario involved. But “Terrified” is a millions miles away from that scenario.
This PAJEET knew nothing about Islam as far as seen in the debate he does not know his own religion too. He did not defend the ill treatment of women from his scriptures. His objection on Islam brought up in this debate was calmly destroyed by Brother Daniel. ٱلْحَمْدُ لِلَّٰهِ. May Allah ﷻ bless brother Daniel and the Ummah. Ameen ya rabbul alameen.