Salah al-Din al-Ayyubi: Lessons From Medieval Geopolitics to Today’s Muslim World

    Date:

    Share post:

    Introduction: Why Compare Then and Now?

    In the history of Islam, few figures are as revered by the masses as Salah al-Din al-Ayyubi (may Allah have mercy on him), whose life was dedicated to the service of Allah and the defense of the Muslim ummah. Known for his piety, humility, and commitment to justice, Salah al-Din’s legacy is more than just a story of battles and conquests; it is a lesson in the power of unity, faith, and righteous leadership. In an era of fragmentation and foreign threats, he revived the spirit of Islamic brotherhood, uniting the Muslim lands and reclaiming Jerusalem, the blessed al-Quds, from the Crusaders.

    Today, the Muslim world faces challenges strikingly similar to those of Salah al-Din’s time—external influences, political divisions, and struggles over sacred lands. By reflecting on the strategies and reforms that Salah al-Din implemented, we can draw valuable lessons from them which can then be applied to our own time. His approach to governance, rooted in justice and service to Allah, offers insights into how Muslims today might work toward a future of strength, unity, and resilience. This article explores the geopolitics of Salah al-Din’s era through an Islamic lens, drawing parallels to current events and highlighting how his legacy can inspire and guide the ummah toward achieving its highest ideals in the face of modern challenges.

    Setting the Stage: Fragmentation and Foreign Influence

    Map after First Crusade

    The political landscape of Salah al-Din’s time was shaped by centuries of shifting power, regional conflicts, and internal divisions within the Muslim world. After the early unity of the Rashidun Khilafah, the ‘Abbasid Khilafah rose to power in 750 AD, establishing Baghdad as a center of learning, culture, and governance that spanned much of the Muslim world. However, by the 10th century, ‘Abbasid control began to weaken as various factions and dynasties sought autonomy, eroding the once-unified Khilafah.

    ‘Abbasid period coins

    The ‘Abbasid decline was intensified by the rise of the Fatimid and Buyid dynasties, both Shi’ah-led powers that challenged Sunni ‘Abbasid authority. The Fatimid Khilafah emerged in North Africa during the early 10th century as an Ismai’li Shi’ah state and gradually expanded its influence, establishing a rival Khilafah with its own capital in Cairo. The Buyids, a Twelver Shi’ah dynasty originating from the Daylamite region, seized control of Baghdad in 945 AD, reducing the ‘Abbasid caliphs to mere figureheads and stripping them of much of their power. These competing Shi’ah dynasties not only created sectarian divides within the Muslim world but also fueled internal instability, weakening the Muslim world’s ability to respond to outside threats.

    RELATED: ‘Ubaydullah Al-Mahdi – The First Isma’ili Caliph and the Fatimid Atrocities

    Assassin’s Creed games were inspired by Batini Shi’ah “Hashashins” who would assassinate Sunni rulers

    This fragmentation set in motion the emergence of local Sunni dynasties, such as the Seljuks, who sought to restore Sunni power and unify Muslim lands under their leadership. In 1055 AD, the Seljuks took control of Baghdad, assuming the role of protectors of the ‘Abbasid Khilafah and reasserting Sunni authority over the region. Although this restored a measure of unity, the Seljuk Empire itself was not immune to internal divisions, as various Seljuk rulers claimed independent authority in different regions. Smaller emirates and principalities also arose, each with their own local interests and loyalties, further fragmenting the political landscape.

    Seljuk vizier Nizam al-Mulk’s assassination en route to Isfahan by the Hashashins, under the leadership of Hassan al-Sabbah, to destabilize the Seljuk dynasty

    The result was a landscape of rivalry and division, with the ‘Abbasids struggling to reassert central authority amid the rise of independent dynasties. This disunity weakened the Muslim world’s ability to respond to the Crusaders, who exploited these divisions in order to establish their own states in the Levant, which included control over Jerusalem. Many Muslim leaders were preoccupied with regional rivalries rather than a unified defense against this external threat, allowing the Crusader presence to expand with minimal resistance.

    RELATED: Why Do We No Longer Have Islamic Heroes Like Salah-ud-Din?

    The last Ottoman sultan being forced to abdicate after WW1, marking the official end of the Ottoman Khilafah

    Modern Parallel: Today, the Muslim world faces a similar landscape of division and foreign influence, particularly in the Middle East. The 20th century witnessed the end of the Ottoman Khilafah, the last Khilafah that had for centuries united Muslim lands. Following World War I, the Sykes-Picot Agreement between Britain and France divided the former Ottoman territories into artificial nation-states with borders being drawn up to serve European interests rather than those of the region. The Balfour Declaration, issued by Britain in 1917, supported the establishment of a Jewish homeland in Palestine, leading to ongoing conflicts over Jerusalem and exacerbating tensions within the region.

    Sykes-Picot Agreement

    The decline of the Ottoman Khilafah along with Western interference in the region led to further fragmentation, as colonial powers installed governments that aligned with their interests, often disregarding the religious and cultural unity of Muslim societies. In many cases, these puppet governments promoted secularization, aiming to diminish Islam’s influence in political and public life. Reports such as the RAND Corporation’s strategy on secularizing the Muslim world highlight a continued push to limit Islam’s influence by promoting secularism, liberal reform, and localized national identities over a unified Islamic identity.

    Under Mustafa Kemal, Turkey underwent forced secularism. ‘Ulama’ were forbidden from wearing their religious headgear, women were forced to take off their niqabs, and both the Qur’an and the Adhan were to be recited in Turkish. The Turkish script was also switched to Latin, replacing the traditional Arabic letters.

    The effects of these historical and modern interventions are still felt today, with Sunni-Shi’ah tensions fueling conflicts in Syria, Iraq, Yemen, and beyond. Countries like Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Iran, and Egypt often pursue competing agendas, sometimes in direct opposition to each other, rather than focusing on a collective strategy for the region’s shared interests. The Muslim world remains vulnerable to external influence from major powers, including the United States, Russia, and European nations, each seeking to advance their own strategic objectives in the region.

    Egyptian consumer products often have symbols of the pyramid, Sphinx, or other elements of the Pharaonic civilization. One of the aims of the RAND reports was to promote pre-Islamic civilizations of different countries as superior in order to disconnect Muslims from their Islamic identities. These past civilizations were not “progressive” as they were destroyed by Allah for their ignorance.

    Just as Salah al-Din recognized the need to overcome local rivalries to reclaim Jerusalem and defend the ummah, today’s Muslim-majority countries face a similar need for unity and collective strategy so as to protect their interests and sovereignty. The lesson from this period in Islamic history underscores the reality that a strong and unified front, built on shared values and mutual cooperation, is essential for confronting both internal challenges and external pressures.

    Cultural and Educational Reforms as Catalysts for Unity

    Salah al-Din’s success was not merely a result of military might; it was deeply influenced by a broader intellectual and cultural revival that sought to unite the ummah through education, spirituality, and loyalty to the state. This transformation was largely driven by the visionary reforms of Nizam al-Mulk, the vizier of the Seljuk Empire, who recognized that only an educated and unified society could withstand both internal divisions and external threats.

    Siyasatanama or “Book of Governance” is a Farsi book written by Nizam al-Mulk that became a standard textbook for the Seljuk and Ottoman rulers.

    Nizam al-Mulk’s key contribution to this unity was the establishment of the Nizamiyyah schools, a network of madrasahs designed to promote not only religious knowledge but also loyalty to the state and a harmonious balance between worldly affairs (dunya) and spiritual matters (din). Nizam al-Mulk sought to create a generation of scholars and leaders who were well-versed in both the religious sciences and the practical knowledge necessary for governance, law, and administration. He aimed to ensure that his students would serve the state with integrity, drawing on Islamic values of justice, governance, and service to the greater good of the ummah.

    Nizamiyyah madrasah in Nishapur

    Moreover, Nizam al-Mulk emphasized the importance of Tassawuf (Sufism), which played a key role in his educational system. Tassawuf instilled in students the values of inner discipline, ethical leadership, and a deep connection with Allah—qualities that aligned well with Nizam al-Mulk’s vision of creating both pious and loyal subjects. By incorporating Sufi teachings alongside formal Islamic jurisprudence and philosophy, he ensured that students would have a spiritual foundation that would guide them in both their personal and political lives.

    The educational system was not just about producing administrators or military leaders—it also served as a defense against ideological threats that had emerged within the Muslim world. Under Nizam al-Mulk’s guidance, the Nizamiyyah schools attracted some of the most brilliant scholars of the time, including Imam al-Ghazali, who became a prominent teacher and intellectual force within this network. Imam al-Ghazali, renowned for his defense of Sunni orthodoxy, played a key role in countering dangerous ideologies that threatened the unity of the Muslim world. He engaged with and refuted ideas from non-Muslim religions, Batini Shi’ah doctrines, and Greek philosophy, all of which sought to challenge the established Sunni tradition. Through his works and teachings, al-Ghazali helped preserve the integrity of Islamic theology and philosophy, ensuring that future generations of Muslims would have the intellectual tools to navigate and defend against these challenges.

    RELATED: The Bātinī Sects: A History of Aiding Colonizers and the Enemies of Islam

    “Tahafut al-Falasifah” or “The Incoherence Of The Philosophers” by Imam al-Ghazali criticized the negative influences of Greek Philosophy on Islamic thought.

    This intellectual and spiritual revival through education laid the groundwork for the rise of leaders like Nur al-Din Zinki and Salah al-Din, who were not only skilled military leaders but also deeply committed to the principles of justice, loyalty, and unity that had been fostered in the educational institutions of their time. Their ability to unite the Muslim world and rally people from diverse regions to defend the sacred city of Jerusalem was, in large part, a result of the shared intellectual and spiritual foundation that had been cultivated in these madrasahs.

    Children studying in a madrasah in Sierra Leone

    Modern Parallel

    Today, the Muslim world faces a similar intellectual and ideological fragmentation, often fueled by external pressures and colonial influences. The legacy of colonialism has left many Muslim-majority countries with secular education systems that often prioritize Western ideals over Islamic values. This is evident in the modern-day reports, like those from RAND, which advocate for the secularization of the Muslim world and the promotion of ideologies that challenge traditional Islamic norms—particularly concerning gender roles, family structure, and religious identity. The RAND Corporation and other Western think tanks have long pushed for the modification of Muslim societies in ways that undermine core Islamic values, often framing them as obstacles to progress.

    RAND has published several papers on secularizing the Muslim world. The blueprint is being utilized closely by UN backed NGOs and Western puppet government heads.

    In response to these ideological challenges, many contemporary scholars and da’wah movements have taken up the mantle of intellectual defense. Figures like Ahmed Deedat, Zakir Naik, Israr Ahmed, and organizations such as Tablighi Jama’ah have played an essential role in defending and promoting orthodox Sunni Islam. The Tablighi Jama’ah, in particular, focuses on personal reform, encouraging Muslims to return to the basics of Islam and strengthen their faith.

    These modern intellectual and grassroots leaders have engaged with various ideologies—ranging from secularism and atheism to critiques of Islam and other Abrahamic faiths—by offering reasoned, theological, and philosophical responses that counter non-Islamic worldviews while reinforcing the foundations of Islamic belief. At Muslim Skeptic, we are constantly trying to develop content to counter anti-Islamic narratives propagating in mass media.

    Zakir Naik and Ahmed Deedat were instrumental in early da’wah efforts of spreading Islam in the modern era.

    Just as Nizam al-Mulk’s reforms and Imam al-Ghazali’s intellectual work helped safeguard Sunni orthodoxy against heretical and external influences, today’s Islamic scholars and da’wah movements are responding to similar challenges. They work to preserve Islamic identity and values, ensuring that Muslims are not only able to defend their faith but also engage with the modern world without compromising their religious principles. These efforts represent a modern-day continuation of the intellectual tradition that helped unify the Muslim world during Salah al-Din’s time—reminding us that a strong, well-educated, and ideologically grounded ummah is the key to facing both internal and external threats, just as it was in the past.

    RELATED: When Will Sunni Muslims Unite?

    Political Consolidation and the Rise of Unified Leadership

    Nur al-Din Zinki’s expansion

    In the century leading up to Salah al-Din’s rise, the Muslim world was politically and geographically fragmented, weakened by internal rivalries and external invasions. However, a series of visionary leaders and reformers emerged with a dedication to unity, justice, and resilience. They transformed the fractured landscape, setting the stage for a unified Muslim resistance against the Crusaders. This period of consolidation involved not only military campaigns but also concerted efforts to establish stable governance, foster loyalty, and instill an overarching sense of purpose within the ummah.

    Coins from Nur al-Din Zinki’s rule

    One of the earliest key figures in this consolidation was Nur al-Din Zinki (1118–1174), a principled leader from the Zengid dynasty who saw the need to unify Muslim territories that had been vulnerable to Crusader incursions. Unlike previous rulers who had focused on local rivalries, Nur al-Din pursued a broader vision of a unified front that was capable of defending the holy lands and countering the Crusader kingdoms. He established an administration rooted in justice and Islamic principles, winning the loyalty of his people and earning the respect of scholars. Through his effective governance, Nur al-Din inspired others to join his cause, transcending tribal and regional divisions and establishing a mission that was as much about defending Islam as it was about politics. His revival of jihad as a spiritual and military effort mobilized the ummah, creating a sense of shared duty that rallied support across the region.

    RELATED: Is Jihad ONLY Defensive? Did Islam Spread by the Sword? (UNAPOLOGETIC Answer)

    Church of the Holy Sepulchre and other historical Christian sites were protected under Muslim rule for millenia. Much of these have been destroyed under the Israeli occupation.

    After Nur al-Din’s death, Salah al-Din inherited this legacy and continued the mission of unification. As ruler of Egypt and Syria, Salah al-Din consolidated Muslim territories through strategic alliances, political diplomacy, and a commitment to justice. Salah al-Din’s leadership, deeply rooted in Islamic values, emphasized mercy, forgiveness, and humility—even towards former adversaries—which earned him admiration both within and outside of the Muslim world. His administration, known for appointing capable and loyal officials, was characterized by justice and stability, ensuring that his territories were well-governed and the people felt a sense of security. Salah al-Din’s work culminated in his successful campaign to retake Jerusalem in 1187, a victory that became emblematic of unity and resilience.

    Sharif Hussein, under the guidance of T.E. Lawrence, betrayed the Ottoman Turks in WW1 under the false promise of being made an Arabic Khalifah. Unsurprisingly, he was betrayed by his instigators, and most of his sons were ousted by their respective kingdoms.

    Modern Parallel

    The decline of the Ottoman Khilafah, once a unifying force for the Muslim world, left the Middle East and North Africa divided and vulnerable to colonial ambitions. Following World War I, agreements like the Sykes-Picot Agreement and the Balfour Declaration facilitated Western control, redrawing borders and establishing puppet governments, dismantling any hopes for a unified Muslim polity.

    The imposed secularism of figures like Mustafa Kemal in Turkey and similar leaders in other parts of the Muslim world forced the adoption of Western secular ideals, sidelining Islamic governance and undermining religious identity. Throughout the 20th century, many Muslim-majority nations faced ideological and political fragmentation, first divided by the Cold War and then destabilized by the Global War on Terror, both of which served as platforms for foreign influence, control, and even direct occupation under the guise of countering extremism.

    RELATED: Mustafa Kemal Ataturk: The Man Who Tried to Destroy Islam

    China and many other nations forming diplomatic and trade relations with the new Taliban government

    Today, the Muslim world has been witnessing a growing desire for self-determination and a revival of Islamic principles in governance. The Taliban’s return to power in Afghanistan is viewed by some as a reassertion of indigenous rule and a rejection of foreign influence, resonating with a broader call for self-governance rooted in Islamic principles. This marked the first time in decades for the Muslim world to counter colonial Western powers. Additionally, rising trade and military partnerships between Muslim countries, as well as the rising call for a unified Khilafah, show an emerging network of mutual reliance aimed at creating a more self-sustained Muslim bloc.

    In 2021, France’s blasphemous depictions of Prophet Muhammad (may Allah bless him and grant him peace) as “free speech” led to mass protests and boycotts in the Muslim world. France took over US $500 million in economic damages from these boycotts.

    These developments resemble the efforts of Nur al-Din and Salah al-Din to build a unified, resilient Muslim world by consolidating political power, fostering loyalty, and emphasizing justice and Islamic values. Like the leaders of Salah al-Din’s era, today’s Muslim leaders and grassroots movements are fighting against ideological fragmentation, colonial residue, and Western pressures. The increasing cooperation and resistance to secularization reflect a renewed commitment to the principles that helped unify the Muslim world in Salah al-Din’s time, reminding us that unity, justice, and a return to Islamic identity are as essential today as they were then.

    RELATED: Latest Arab Youth Survey: Less Democracy and More Shariah Please!

    Jerusalem as a Symbol of Unity and Struggle

    Masjid al-Aqsa interior

    Throughout Islamic history, Jerusalem (al-Quds) has held profound religious, cultural, and political significance for the Muslim world. Jerusalem, the location of al-Aqsa masjid, one of Islam’s holiest sites, has been a focal point of worship, unity, and reverence. During Salah al-Din’s time, the city symbolized a broader struggle for dignity, sovereignty, and religious freedom, especially after the Crusaders seized control in 1099. Their brutal conquest was marked by the massacre of Muslims, Jews, and even Christians who did not align with Crusader doctrine—a violent rupture in the long tradition of pluralistic and tolerant rule that Muslims had fostered in the region.

    Crusaders surrender to Salah al-Din after the Battle of Hattin

    For Salah al-Din, reclaiming Jerusalem went beyond a mere political ambition; it was a spiritual mission and a call to unify the Muslim ummah in the face of foreign dominance. The struggle to liberate Jerusalem inspired Muslims across different regions and dynasties to transcend internal rivalries and join forces for a common cause. This unity culminated in the Battle of Hattin in 1187, where Salah al-Din’s forces defeated the Crusaders, paving the way for Jerusalem’s peaceful liberation. His actions upon entering the city exemplified mercy and justice—allowing Crusaders and civilians to leave unharmed and protecting the city’s sanctity for all faiths. Salah al-Din’s liberation of Jerusalem thus became a symbol of resilience, unity, and faith in the face of overwhelming challenges.

    IDF terrorists bombarded civilian areas in Gaza in “self defense.” 70% of the deaths were from innocent women and children.

    Modern Parallel: Today, Jerusalem remains a central symbol of resistance and identity for Muslims worldwide, as the city and its surrounding areas once again face conflict, displacement, and desecration. Since the establishment of Israel in 1948, Palestinians—both Muslim and Christian—have faced escalating violence, displacement, and restrictions, particularly in Gaza, the West Bank, and around al-Aqsa masjid. Israel’s military actions and aggressive settlement expansion in pursuit of establishing a “Greater Israel” have targeted Muslim and Christian communities alike, sparking global protests. As during the Crusader occupation, the modern era has seen massacres and forced removals, which have galvanized Muslims and non-Muslims alike to call for justice and religious freedom in Jerusalem. Even international bodies, such as the South African International Court of Justice, have condemned Israel’s human rights abuses, reflecting a growing global outcry.

    Saudi Arabia and Iran joint naval training in the Red Sea

    Despite their weaker funding and military resources, many Muslim countries have taken bold actions to counter this aggression. Iran has developed missile technology capable of penetrating Israel’s Iron Dome, while Yemen has blocked off ships traveling to and from Israel, signaling a willingness to protect al-Aqsa even at great personal cost. In an unprecedented show of solidarity, Saudi Arabia and Iran have formed an alliance, with Saudi Arabia declaring its intent to counter any American forces that attempt to intervene in Iran. These actions, along with widespread demonstrations and the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement, are united efforts to resist the oppression that threatens Jerusalem’s sanctity and peace.

    Companies that support Israel took massive financial hit due to global BDS movements.

    The situation in Jerusalem today mirrors the Crusader period, where a foreign power’s occupation led to widespread suffering and upheaval. But just as Salah al-Din’s era inspired Muslims to unite, the current struggle over Jerusalem has sparked alliances, protests, and resistance across the Muslim world and beyond. Today, al-Quds continues to be a unifying symbol, reminding the ummah of its duty to protect and honor sacred lands. For Muslims globally, the fight for justice in Jerusalem has become a renewed call for unity, as communities rally to defend their shared identity and faith, inspired by the lessons of Salah al-Din’s era.

    RELATED: [WATCH] Boycotting Starbucks and McDonalds Is NOT Enough

    Legacy and Lessons: What Can We Learn Today?

    Everything in life is temporary. But Allah is eternal and can listen to us at all times in any language. He knows us better than we know ourselves, and He is closer to us than our jugular veins.

    The legacy of Salah al-Din al-Ayyubi and his contemporaries continues to reverberate across the Muslim world, offering invaluable lessons for contemporary Muslims who seek to reclaim dignity, unity, and strength. Salah al-Din’s success in uniting a fractured Muslim world and his subsequent victory in liberating Jerusalem is not merely a tale of military triumph but also a story of the power of faith, leadership, justice, and vision. His life provides timeless principles on the importance of moral leadership, the pursuit of knowledge, and the essential role of justice in both governance and warfare.

    Many backgrounds. One purpose.

    One of the key lessons from Salah al-Din’s leadership is the idea of unity in the face of division. In his time, the Muslim world was fragmented into various rival factions and dynasties. Despite these divisions, Salah al-Din and his mentor Nur al-Din Zinki recognized that the unity of the ummah was paramount to confronting external threats, particularly the Crusaders. They transcended personal or sectarian rivalries, focusing on a collective goal—the liberation of Jerusalem and the preservation of Muslim identity. This lesson is particularly relevant today, as the Muslim world faces a wide range of political and social challenges, from internal divisions to foreign interference. The example of Salah al-Din teaches us that, even in the face of seemingly insurmountable odds, Muslims must unite around shared values of faith, justice, and the common good.

    RELATED: The Concept of Khilāfah in Islam

    Qur’an verse on justice at Harvard Law School

    The importance of moral leadership is another powerful lesson that Salah al-Din’s legacy provides. Throughout his campaigns, Salah al-Din was known for his humility, integrity, and sense of accountability. He ruled with piety, often spending his nights in prayer, and he sought to establish a just and compassionate system of governance. His leadership was not driven by personal ambition or power but by a sense of duty to protect the faith and welfare of his people. In today’s world, where leadership is often motivated by power, wealth, or influence, the example of Salah al-Din reminds us of the importance of ruling with justice and compassion, guided by the principles of Islam. His refusal to engage in unnecessary violence, especially when recapturing Jerusalem, also teaches us the importance of mercy, even in times of conflict.

    Palestinian refugees during d al-Adha

    Furthermore, Salah al-Din’s focus on education and knowledge was pivotal to his success. His efforts to establish schools that promoted both religious and worldly knowledge helped to cultivate a generation of leaders, scholars, and warriors who were equipped with the tools needed to preserve and expand the Muslim empire. Today, as Muslims face ideological battles against secularism, materialism, and extremism, the need for an education system that nurtures both religious understanding and intellectual development has never been more critical. The lessons from Salah al-Din’s era urge us to focus on holistic education, one that not only addresses the spiritual needs of Muslims but also empowers them in the fields of science, technology, and governance.

    Türkiye has been creating several “Islamic” historical dramas to try and connect Muslims to their Islamic roots. There have even been incidents of several non-Muslims accepting Islam after watching these shows.

    Today, the Muslim world faces challenges not dissimilar to those faced by Salah al-Din. The ummah remains fragmented, politically weak, and vulnerable to foreign interference. The continued occupation of Jerusalem and the suffering of the Palestinian people serve as painful reminders of the injustices that Salah al-Din sought to rectify. However, just as he managed to unite a fractured Muslim world through faith and justice, there are signs of hope today. The increasing political and military alliances between Muslim-majority countries, such as the Saudi-Iran rapprochement and cooperation between Türkiye, Qatar, Pakistan, and Malaysia, show that there is potential for the Muslim world to rise from its divisions and come together for shared goals.

    Bisho Ijtema in Tongi, in the outskirts of Bangladesh. It is one of the most popular Tablighi Jama’ah gatherings and has the second largest number of Muslim attendees after Hajj.

    Additionally, grassroots movements across the Muslim world are increasingly advocating more and more for the restoration of Islamic governance based on justice, mercy, and the rule of law, reflecting Salah al-Din’s leadership style. From Islamic revival movements like Tablighi Jama’ah, to da’wah movements led by figures such as Zakir Naik, Ahmed Deedat, and Dr. Israr Ahmed, Muslims today are working to counter ideologies that undermine Islamic values. These movements emphasize the importance of piety, ethical leadership, and justice, similar to the values upheld by Salah al-Din.

    BDS protests in Melbourne, Australia

    Finally, the ongoing struggles for Palestinian rights, the growing BDS movement, and the increasing calls for boycotts of Israeli products are modern echoes of the resistance Salah al-Din led against foreign oppression. Despite the military and political challenges, the spirit of Salah al-Din’s era lives on in the efforts to safeguard Jerusalem, the rights of the oppressed, and the dignity of the Muslim ummah.

    Gold dinar coins under Salah al-Din

    Salah al-Din’s legacy reminds us that Islamic unity, just leadership, and commitment to faith and knowledge are the pillars on which future success must be built. While the geopolitical landscape may have changed, the core principles that allowed Salah al-Din to triumph—faith, unity, justice, and the defense of sacred rights—remain as relevant and necessary as ever. The lessons from his life provide a guiding light for Muslims today, urging them to build on their shared values, reclaim their dignity, and work toward a future in which justice and peace reign, just as they did in the age of Salah al-Din.

    Muslims from across the globe and of different socio-economic and racial backgrounds pray next to each other at the Ka’bah in Mecca

    The success of Salah al-Din did not occur within a vacuum. It took several people with a long term vision to bring about the right level of education and unity. Just like the people of his time, we too must operate at every level and every sector to bring about the success of the ummah.

    RELATED: Saving the World: An Important Message for All Muslim Women

    spot_img

    25 COMMENTS

    Subscribe
    Notify of
    guest

    25 Comments
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    Great White Megalodon
    Great White Megalodon
    11 months ago

    Very inspiring article! Well written!

    Abdullah Ali
    Abdullah Ali
    11 months ago

    Salahuddin destroyed the Fatimids before turning to Jerusalem. Who will destroy the Khomeinists?

    Megalodon
    Megalodon
    Reply to  Abdullah Ali
    11 months ago

    Exactly

    Megalodon
    Megalodon
    11 months ago

    Funny you didn’t mention that while the Seljuks were fighting the crusaders the Fatimids backstabbed them and took Al quds weakening the defenses making it easier for the crusaders to take Al quds and before Salahudin fought the crusaders he fought the Fatimids and destroyed their state . Also the Fatimids weren’t a caliphate .

    Megalodon
    Megalodon
    Reply to  Megalodon
    11 months ago

    Also you mentioned ra alight jammat but why haven’t you mentioned the salafi movement ? They are also calling for a return to Islam . Why haven’t you called unity with the madkhalis? You are willing to call for unity with the worst of deviants but not with deviants whose deviance is level 1 or small compared to Shia and Sufis where’s the unity with all Muslims including madkhalis and “wahabis” and salafis .

    Ahmad
    Ahmad
    Reply to  Megalodon
    11 months ago

    You’re a moron and a jahil. It’s the madkhalis who are anti (political) unity and in bed with the enemies of Islam. There are also many sufis and shias in bed with the kuffar. The context and point is that sincere and sensible people from all these sects, despite glaringly obvious aqidah differences, can unite on a political front against kuffar’s colonialism.

    Ahmad
    Ahmad
    Reply to  Ahmad
    11 months ago

    Salahuddin was a hard core Ashari Sufi btw.

    Megalodon
    Megalodon
    Reply to  Ahmad
    11 months ago

    He wasn’t a Sufi as for Ashari he might have been Ashari in name but his Aqeedah could have been similar to the athari Aqeedah like imam nawai rh also even accepting your claim about Salahudin rh it doesn’t change the fact he fought against the Shia first than the crusades.

    Ahmad
    Ahmad
    Reply to  Megalodon
    11 months ago

    Keep lying to yourself!

    This is a hallmark of you guys, no different than the rawafid. Lying just to suit your imagination! Salahuddin was a proper Sufi on the Qadiri tariqah & a staunch Ashari.

    I’ve never seen a Sufi who’s pro rawafid in toto. Only in the anti-colonialist context. Even the sellout ones are sold out to the west not to the rawafid.

    Anyways, this is internal fight for the millah, not for the time of opposing kuffar colonialism. Fools like you don’t learn, though.

    Megalodon
    Megalodon
    Reply to  Ahmad
    11 months ago

    You have to provide proof he was a a Sufi you can’t so you have to accuse me of lying.

    Megalodon
    Megalodon
    Reply to  Ahmad
    11 months ago

    Actually most of the madkahlis are fine with unity with fellow Sunnis just not the Shia .

    Megalodon
    Megalodon
    Reply to  Ahmad
    11 months ago

    Secondly if Shia and Sufis really want unity why do they constantly label those who expose their shirk and kufr as “wahabis” and secondly why don’t they ever denounce the crime of Iran and her proxies in Iraq and Afghanistan and Yemen and Syria . And constantly label anyone who is against Iran and what Iran did in those countries as “wahabi” and “D@#sh” is this also not sectarianism that Daniel always cries about and eve calls out why don’t Daniel ever call out the sectarianism by the Shia

    Ahmad
    Ahmad
    Reply to  Megalodon
    11 months ago

    If wahabis want unity, why do they keep crying against those who expose their tajseem and tashbih? You people are pathetic liars. I missed your suggestion the Ashari Nawawi was a mujassim. You’re all handicaps and cripples who can’t have their Islam without Ashairah like Nawawi, Suyuti, Salahuddin, Bayhaqi or Maturidiyyah like Nasafi, Sultan Muhammad, Al-Qari etc. Ahmad bin Hanbal and true Hanbalis were not mujassimah.

    Megalodon
    Megalodon
    Reply to  Ahmad
    11 months ago

    We don’t cry we respond to you it’s you who lies about he attributes of Allah . “Pathetic liars” you’re the guy that claims all these heroes of Islam were Sufis without providing evidence. As for imam nawai rh Islamqa refutes you he was only ashari in name but his aqeedah was of the Atharis.

    Megalodon
    Megalodon
    Reply to  Ahmad
    11 months ago

    Also let me accept your argument that most madkhalis are anti unity okay? So are the Shia their actions in Iraq and Syria and Yemen and Afghanistan have shown their calls for Sunni Shia unity is lip service. They don’t mean it but you are too emotional to realize that.

    Ahmad
    Ahmad
    Reply to  Megalodon
    11 months ago

    We don’t love or trust the rawafid. You can’t see the anti-colonialist context. As for lying against the heroes of Islam, that’s you mujassimah. As I said you’re all cripples and handicaps, so you have no choice but to claim heroes like Salahuddin were mujassim like you. It is well known and documented he was a Ashari and Sufi Qadiri. History and rijaal can’t be taught in the comments section of this site, but too bad your “knowledge” starts and ends on the web.

    Ahmad
    Ahmad
    Reply to  Ahmad
    11 months ago

    Claiming Nawawi to be a salafi based on islamqa is a really funny joke.

    Megalodon
    Megalodon
    Reply to  Ahmad
    11 months ago

    Than you’re a joke

    Megalodon
    Megalodon
    Reply to  Ahmad
    11 months ago

    Neither do I trust the rawafid secondly first prove Salahudin was a Sufi name some references

    Abdullah
    Abdullah
    11 months ago

    Is it me, or are there unit 8200 z***ist j**s in the comment section trying to create discord via the Yinon plan?

    Or at least people getting influenced by this whole Yinon plan stuff?

    Abdullah
    Abdullah
    Reply to  Abdullah
    11 months ago

    I know there most likely a unit 8200 account here that claimed to be a shia, saying all of these evil things about the Sahaba, but the weirdest thing about him was how he was saying j**s aren’t behind pushing subversive evil stuff in society like LGBT, and was repeating the j**ish narrative of WW2.

    I wonder how many sockpuppet accounts these j**s have here that possibly larp as opposition to this.

    Blueish
    Blueish
    Reply to  Abdullah
    11 months ago

    Ali and Hussein ?

    Last edited 11 months ago by Blueish
    Blueish
    Blueish
    11 months ago

    May Allah save us from the discord between brothers because it is the first test before going to full-on war against kuffar. Ameen ya Rab

    Last edited 11 months ago by Blueish
    Takeshi
    Takeshi
    11 months ago

    There are people above who say that Saladin fought the Fatimid Ismaili shiites first before facing the crusaders and that the Shiite Ismaili Fatimids of Egypt betrayed the Seljuk princes/emirates. This is not entirely correct.
    The Fatimid and Seljuk elites/princes were fighting each other for control of towns and trade routes, etc;
    Then the Crusaders (thanks to the support of the Eastern Roman Empire/Byzantines) arrived by surprise and wiped them all out and they conquered Jerusalem.

    Megalodon
    Megalodon
    Reply to  Takeshi
    11 months ago

    I mean it’s still correct as the Seljuks of Anatolia or rum was fighting the crusaders and Byzantines and while that was happening the Fatimids at the worst timing decided to take Jerusalem . And the wall as were weakened making it easy for the crusaders to take Al quds.

    Newsletter

    spot_img

    Popular

    More like this
    Related

    The Ottoman Devşirme vs the Modern Liberal Education System

    In modern historiography and public discourse, there is perhaps...

    Invisible Wounds That’ll Keep Claiming IDF Lives: PTSD and the Gaza War

    A distinct narrative has emerged within segments of the...

    Ibn Abd al-Wahhab Contradicts the Salaf on the Shahada

    Wahhabis claim that they follow the Quran and Sunna...

    The Dark Enlightenment: Between Transhumanism and Zionism

    Between mid-September and early October, Peter Thiel delivered a...
    Toggle Dark Mode
    Toggle Font Size