For decades, the United States has championed democracy as a universal good, presenting it as essential for freedom and progress. However, democracy has also been used as a geopolitical tool, advancing U.S. interests rather than the empowerment of nations. Central to this strategy is the RICE framework, which identifies four key motivators used by intelligence agencies: Reward, Ideology, Coercion, and Ego. This offers a lens through which it can be understood how the U.S. motivates individuals and nations to align with its goals.

Among these, ideology—the belief in democracy as a superior system—is the most effective motivator, providing moral justification for interventions. However, this emphasis often clashes with the Islamic perspective, where governance is based on divine law, not majority rule. For instance, under Islamic law, alcohol remains haram (unlawful) even if it is accepted by the majority of society, in stark contrast with democracy’s foundation in popular opinion.

What is the RICE framework?

The RICE framework breaks down motivations as follows:

• Reward: Offering material incentives like money or power.
• Ideology: Inspiring loyalty to a belief system, such as democracy.
• Coercion: Using threats or force to compel compliance.
• Ego: Appealing to pride, status, or ambition.

While all four play a role, ideology provides a long-term narrative that aligns nations and individuals with U.S. interests. Compared to other incentives, ideology had always been far more effective for both recruiting spies for the purpose of espionage; and colonization in foreign policies. For example, the CIA effectively uses the RICE framework for recruiting loyal young citizens as field operatives, as well as convincing foreign spies to switch sides and essentially becoming double agents.

RELATED: What We as Muslims Can Learn From the 1960s Black Liberation Movement

Democracy in the Cold War and Beyond

During the Cold War, democracy was weaponized to counter Soviet communism. The U.S. often intervened in nations under the guise of protecting democracy while prioritizing its strategic goals. For example, the overthrow of Iran’s democratically elected Prime Minister Mossadegh in 1953 was framed as a fight against communism, though it primarily safeguarded Western oil interests.

This selective application of democracy continued into the Global War on Terror. Interventions in Iraq and Afghanistan were justified as efforts to liberate oppressed populations, ignoring the Islamic traditions of these societies. Leaders that were aligned with U.S. interests were framed as democratic reformers, while resistance movements were labeled as terrorist organizations.

The case of Hamas is a clear example in this regard. After winning the 2006 Palestinian elections, Hamas was initially recognized as a legitimate political actor by some, including during certain negotiations in 2019. However, it was later reclassified as a terrorist organization when it no longer aligned with U.S. and Israeli interests. It should be noted that the vast majority of the world still recognizes the legitimacy of Hamas. This shifting narrative mirrors other historical examples such as Nelson Mandela, who was once labeled a terrorist but was later celebrated as a global leader.

RELATED: Become Feminists or Starve! The UN Pushes Girls Education in Afghanistan

Why Ideology Matters Most

Ideology, as used in RICE, creates a certain moral alignment that endures beyond material rewards or coercion. By framing democracy as something universally beneficial, the U.S. secures allies and justifies interventions. Yet this approach often fails in Muslim-majority nations, where governance is rooted in Islamic law.

Islam’s divine laws remain unchanging, providing justice and accountability that transcend mere human whims and desires. This is fundamentally at odds with democracy’s reliance on majority rule, making the imposition of democracy disruptive and alien to such societies.

Conclusion

The U.S. promotes democracy not as an end in and of itself but, rather, as a means to secure its geopolitical dominance, leveraging the RICE framework to achieve its goals. While ideology is a powerful tool, its imposition on Muslim-majority nations often leads to instability and resistance.

For Muslims, understanding these tactics is essential towards being able to critically evaluate foreign interventions and to protect their values. Governance must prioritize justice, accountability, and divine guidance over the shifting ideals of global powers. Recognizing the selective use of democracy allows for greater awareness and resistance to external manipulation.

RELATED: Why Only Idiots Believe in Democracy