This is a guest post by Abdullah Noorudeen from Coolness of Hind.

At the time of writing, outrage surrounding the topic of child sexual abuse in the UK, sensationalised as “grooming gangs”, is being manufactured and stoked by a cabal of Zionists, chief amongst them, billionaires Elon Musk and Bill Ackman.

The anti-Muslim propaganda consists of a cocktail of hyperbole and outright falsehoods, debunked ironically by Grok AI, Musk’s “source of truth” (see here and here). For a more rigorous dissection of the so-called “grooming gang” propaganda, see here, here, and here).

As part of this onslaught, Musk has repeatedly supported Tommy Robinson and his “grooming gangs” narrative.

Before delving into their shared animus toward Islam and Muslims, it is worth highlighting another key area where Robinson serves Musk’s interests: their stance on the migration of Indians for labour. Robinson has openly called for the borders to be opened to “Hindus and Sikhs” (see here), a stance that dovetails neatly with Elon Musk’s MAGA-enraging advocacy for the H-1B visa programme, which facilitates the migration of Indian workers to the US.

It’s no mere coincidence that Robinson’s “grooming gangs” narratives spring up as the Zionist propaganda machine – driven by a well-oiled, freshly funded hasbara campaign – looks to divert attention. Instead of the ongoing genocide perpetrated by the Zionist terror regime, the spotlight is redirected onto Islam and Muslims, with “grooming gangs” serving as the latest rhetorical weapon in a digital war of distraction. The pattern is all too clear: every major Zionist account on ‘X’ seems to be amplifying the same blusterous propaganda.

Murray Grooming Musk

In this regard, Musk’s boosting of Robinson’s agenda points to another hand at play: Douglas Murray.

As we have documented in some detail, Murray and Robinson are connected, with the latter mobilising popular expression for the former’s anti-Muslim rhetoric. This dynamic was apparent in November 2023, when, in opposition to a pro-Palestine march, Murray called for the “people of Britain” to “stop these barbarians”. Soon after Musk activated Robinson’s ‘X’ account, who then went to work practically implementing Murray’s call. This led to Robinson’s followers engaging in violence and injuring police officers on the day of the march.

Relevant here is Musk’s ideological grooming at the hands of Murray, as recently evidenced by Musk’s endorsement of the book, The Strange Death of Europe.

In this work, Murray taps into the xenophobic current of the times and links the “grooming gangs” to particular immigrant culture and religion (“Pakistani-Muslim”). Of course, Islam’s prohibitions concerning all the facets of “grooming” – male-female intermingling and contact, use of intoxicants, and extramarital sexual behaviour – are clear and usually the brunt of neocon attacks to trigger a deformation of Islam. So, the attempt to associate the two is specious.

Musk, not only parroting the neoconservative narrative surrounding Muslims and the so-called “grooming gangs,” but also amplifying Murray’s vile rhetoric on the matter, leaves little room to deny the latter’s complicit role in this toxic discourse.

Given Murray’s moralising over this issue, we must ask: Is his own “background culture” permissive of such grooming? And we’re not just talking about the philosophical, political, and cultural hedonism or the hyper-individualistic and morally flexible society, one in which cultural decay and the breakdown of traditional values have laid the groundwork for the very issues he purports to condemn.

We’re specifically alluding to his attachment to neoconservatism.

RELATED: Prohibition of Gender Mixing: A Protective Islamic Civilisational Barrier

Neocon Pederasty

Murray has defended and praised Jewish philosopher and neocon godfather Leo Strauss as an “intellectual pillar” of neoconservatism.^[1]

Disturbingly, Strauss’s thought flirts with pederasty and grooming of students in education settings.

Shadia Drury notes in her book, The Political Ideas of Leo Strauss:^[2]

To put it succinctly, Strauss’s idea separating sexual pleasure from emotional and familial bonds – associated with male-female relationships – could be achieved in the preference of boys over women.

This subtle allusion to pederasty is more apparent in Strauss’s essay, “Progress or Return?”, where he urges the return to the roots of Western civilisation: the Bible and Greek philosophy. In attempting to demonstrate the harmony between these two origins, Strauss argues that neither the Bible nor the Greeks promoted pederasty indiscriminately, but they confined it to the elite and the “manliest men”:^[3]

Murray credits another Jewish philosopher and student of Strauss, Allan Bloom, as the man who continued neocon thought.

Whilst Bloom, a homosexual, was critical of some arguments made by Greeks for pederastic practices, he declared that pederasty “has a certain connection with philosophy”.

According to Diana Schaub, Bloom considered pedagogy to effectively arise from pederasty.

As a homosexual neoconservative, does Murray agree with his masters’ child sexual grooming/abuse-enabling logic?

Was this neocon attitude toward “educational” child sexual grooming the real reason why Murray’s anti-Muslim neocon associate, Michael Gove did not want a public inquiry in the Westminster child sex abuse ring?

RELATED: Israel’s Post-Gaza Plan: Deepening Israel-UAE’s “Abrahamic” Authoritarianism in the UK

Neocon Praxis?

Irrespective of Murray’s personal views on the reprehensible pontifications espoused by neocon ideologues, it is worth highlighting that he has whitewashed the deeply troubling involvement of Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein’s legal consigliere, in the latter’s sordid child sexual abuse operation. According to unsealed court documents, Dershowitz had engaged in sexual relations with a minor forced by Epstein. Dershowitz also witnessed the sexual abuse of other minors.

Murray’s relationship with Dershowitz stretches back to the 2000s through NGO Monitor, a Jerusalem-based neoconservative pro-Israel lobby group with connections to the Israeli government. Both are on the international advisory board of the organisation.

You can read more about this here: Douglas Murray, Alan Dershowitz, and the Neocon-Epstein Nexus.

Murray’s other affiliations also invite scrutiny.

For example, Murray has been hosted on Lawrence Krauss’s podcast, with Krauss praising Murray as “charming” and a “delightful writer”.

Shockingly, Lawrence Krauss has defended Epstein, even after he was convicted.

In another Krauss podcast, Murray appears with Richard Dawkins. Dawkins has defended “mild” child sexual abuse and claimed that raising children according to religion is worse.

Quite the grotesque circle of friends, Mr. Murray.

RELATED: Atheism Has No Morality

Prostituting for a Rape-Tolerant Regime

Then, of course, there is the glaring dilemma: Murray has become nothing short of a PR prostitute for the Zionist terror regime. His efforts were rewarded by the genocidal “Israeli” President Isaac Herzog, who honoured him with an award for his staunch support of the “Jewish State”.

“Israel” is a known safe haven for perpetrators of child sexual abuse. It’s media and public celebrate and glorify Zionist-Jewish soldiers implicated in sexual violence, elevating them to near-heroic status on prime-time television.

Vile rabbis bless such individuals.

A UN report published in October 2024 documented more than 20 cases of sexual violence against Palestinians (link here; see also, here). This included “the use of an electrical probe to cause burns to the anus and the insertion of objects, such as sticks, broomsticks and vegetables, into the anus”. Palestinian Muslim women are sexually humiliated and degraded through vile acts. The Commission found that this was all driven by an “extreme hatred towards and a desire to dehumanize the Palestinian people”.

Palestinian children also endure unspeakable horrors in Israeli dungeons, as they are subjected to systematic sexual abuse in a cruel, unchecked reality.

According to Save the Children, before October 7^th 2023, approximately a thousand children had been held hostage by the Zionist terror regime. Of them, 69% had experienced sexual violence and abuse. Conditions since have only deteriorated.

For all their moral posturing, Murray, Musk, and all other Zionists happily cheer the regime responsible for these atrocities.

Pertinently, in the case of Murray, it raises the question: Does his ideological allegiance blind him to the monstrous abuses happening under the regime he defends?

Concluding Remarks

Since the beginning of the Gaza genocide, the consistent theme of Zionist terror regime and its neocon agents in the West is that their accusations are often, quite revealingly, confessions in disguise.

And so it is with their latest campaign to demonise Islam and Muslims. Whilst Muslims are religiously forbidden from engaging in “grooming gang” actions that neoconservatives so eagerly associate with Islam, these same neocons – perhaps driven by their own philosophical and cultural predilections – not only whitewash child sexual abusers and fraternise with their defenders, but they also lend their full-throated support to the Zionist terror regime, which carries out such atrocities on an industrial scale.

RELATED: Israel’s Post-Gaza Plan: The Christian-Zionist Beneficiaries of the “Abrahamic Family House” Project

References

[1] Murray, Neoconservatism: Why We Need It, 2006. p.42.

[2] Drury, The Political Ideas of Leo Strauss, 2005, p.70.

[3] Drury, Shadia. Political Theory 19, no. 4 (1991): 671–75. http://www.jstor.org/stable/192065, pp.673–674.